Assignment 1: Short Answer Assessment AND Assignment 2: Assessing and Treating Patients With Sleep/Wake Disorders
Rubric Detail for Assignment 1
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Name: NURS_6630_Week8_Assignment1_Rubric
|
|
Excellent Point range: 90–100 |
Good Point range: 80–89 |
Fair Point range: 70–79 |
Poor Point range: 0–69 |
|
In 3 or 4 sentences, explain the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. Which drugs are contraindicated, if any, and why. Be specific. What it is the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms? |
12 (16%) - 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. The response accurately and clearly details which drugs are contraindicated with specific examples. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. |
11 (14.67%) - 11 (14.67%) The response accurately explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. The response accurately identifies which drugs are contraindicated with specific examples. The response accurately explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. |
10 (13.33%) - 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies which drugs are contraindicated with inaccurate or vague examples. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. |
0 (0%) - 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies which drugs are contraindicated with inaccurate examples, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms, or is missing. |
|
List four predictors of late onset generalized anxiety disorder. |
12 (16%) - 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly lists in detail four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. |
11 (14.67%) - 11 (14.67%) The response accurately lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. |
10 (13.33%) - 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. |
0 (0%) - 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder, or is missing. |
|
List four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. |
12 (16%) - 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly lists in detail four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. |
11 (14.67%) - 11 (14.67%) The response accurately lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. |
10 (13.33%) - 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. |
0 (0%) - 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. |
|
An episode of major depression is defined as a period of time lasting at least 2 weeks. List at least five symptoms required for the episode to occur. Be specific. |
12 (16%) - 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur. Specific examples provided fully support the response. |
11 (14.67%) - 11 (14.67%) The response accurately explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur. Specific examples provided support the response. |
10 (13.33%) - 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur. Specific examples provided inaccurately or vaguely support the response. |
0 (0%) - 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur, or is missing. Specific examples provided do not support the response, or is missing. |
|
List 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Be specific. |
12 (16%) - 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly lists in detail 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Examples provided fully support the response provided. |
11 (14.67%) - 11 (14.67%) The response accurately lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Examples provided support the response provided. |
10 (13.33%) - 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Examples provided inaccurately or vaguely support the response provided. |
0 (0%) - 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia, or is missing. Examples provided do not support the response provided, or is missing. |
|
Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 (6.67%) - 5 (6.67%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 (5.33%) - 4 (5.33%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3.5 (4.67%) - 3.5 (4.67%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
0 (0%) - 2 (2.67%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
|
Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
5 (6.67%) - 5 (6.67%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
4 (5.33%) - 4 (5.33%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. |
3.5 (4.67%) - 3.5 (4.67%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. |
0 (0%) - 2 (2.67%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
|
Total Points: 75 |
Name: NURS_6630_Week8_Assignment1_Rubric
{"mode":"full","isActive":false}
Rubric Detail for Assignment 2
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Name: NURS_6630_Week8_Assignment2_Rubric
|
|
Excellent Point range: 90–100 |
Good Point range: 80–89 |
Fair Point range: 70–79 |
Poor Point range: 0–69 |
|
Introduction to the case (1 page) Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient. |
9 (9%) - 10 (10%) The response accurately, clearly, and fully summarizes in detail the case for the Assignment. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the specific patient factors that impact decision making when prescribing medication for this patient. |
8 (8%) - 8 (8%) The response accurately summarizes the case for the Assignment. The response accurately explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient. |
7 (7%) - 7 (7%) The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the case for the Assignment. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient. |
0 (0%) - 6 (6%) The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the case for the Assignment, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient. |
|
Decision #1 (1–2 pages) • Which decision did you select? • Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. • Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature). • Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples. |
18 (18%) - 20 (20%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients. Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided. |
16 (16%) - 17 (17%) The response accurately explains the decision selected. The response explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the decision selected. The response accurately explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response. The response accurately explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response. The response accurately explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients. Examples provided support the decisions and responses provided. |
14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the decision selected. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the decision selected. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients. Examples provided may support the decisions and responses provided. |
0 (0%) - 13 (13%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the decision selected. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the response, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients, or is missing. Examples provided do not support the decisions and responses provided, or is missing. |
|
Decision #2 (1–2 pages) • Which decision did you select? • Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. • Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature). • Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples. |
18 (18%) - 20 (20%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients. Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided. |
16 (16%) - 17 (17%) The response accurately explains the decision selected. The response explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the decision selected. The response accurately explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response. The response accurately explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response. The response accurately explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients. Examples provided support the decisions and responses provided. |
14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the decision selected. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the decision selected. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients. Examples provided may support the decisions and responses provided. |
0 (0%) - 13 (13%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains in detail the decision selected. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the response, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients, or is missing. Examples provided do not support the decisions and responses provided, or is missing. |
|
Decision #3 (1–2 pages) • Which decision did you select? • Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. • Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature). • Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples. |
18 (18%) - 20 (20%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients. Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided. |
16 (16%) - 17 (17%) The response accurately explains the decision selected. The response explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the decision selected. The response accurately explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response. The response accurately explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response. The response accurately explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients. Examples provided support the decisions and responses provided. |
14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the decision selected. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the decision selected. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients. Examples provided may support the decisions and responses provided. |
0 (0%) - 13 (13%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains in detail the decision selected. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the response, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients, or is missing. Examples provided do not support the decisions and responses provided, or is missing. |
|
Conclusion (1 page) • Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. |
14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the recommendations on the treatment options selected for this patient. The response accurately and clearly explains a justification for the recommendations provided, including clinically relevant resources that fully support the recommendations provided. |
12 (12%) - 13 (13%) The response accurately summarizes the recommendations on the treatment options selected for this patient. The response accurately explains a justification for the recommendation provided, including clinically relevant resources that support the recommendations provided. |
11 (11%) - 11 (11%) The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the recommendations on the treatment options selected for this patient. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains a justification for the recommendations provided, including clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the recommendations provided. |
0 (0%) - 10 (10%) The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the recommendations on the treatment options selected for this patient, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains a justification for the recommendations provided, including clinically relevant resources that do not support the recommendations provided, or is missing. |
|
Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. |
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. |
|
Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
|
Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. |
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. |
0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
|
Total Points: 100 |
Name: NURS_6630_Week8_Assignment2_Rubric
{"mode":"full","isActive":false}
Exit
Exit
Exit
Exit