canceled

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: Reflection Assignments Grading Rubric

• Grid View
• List View

	Exemplary	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
Organization and Structure	Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) - 14.29 (14.29%) Paper and thoughts are thoroughly organized and structured with precision on targeted theme. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 6 (6%) - 11 (11%) Paper has structure, but statements contain too much extraneous information that does not have an obvious relation to the paper theme. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Paper lacks structure and/or clear organization of thought, thus not clearly aligned with requirements for completion Feedback:
Content and Main Points	Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) - 14.29 (14.29%) Content evidences a synthesis of ideas, in-depth analysis and original thought in support of topic, and main points developed with high quality. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 6 (6%) - 11 (11%) Has evidence of content theme, but contains extraneous or unclear language resulting in difficulty interpreting main points. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Main points are underdeveloped, and/or includes unclear reasoning. Feedback:
Evaluation on Americanization Experience and Theory	Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) - 14.29 (14.29%) Provides and insightful and thought provoking evaluation on ethnic group's Americanization experiences integrating into Anglo-American dominant culture. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 6 (6%) - 11 (11%) Discussions include a modest understanding ethnic group's Americanization expereinces, but contains too much extraneous information preventing insightful understanding on Americanization access. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Discussion does not adequately, or completely omits discussion on Americanization experience. Feedback:
Constructive Use of Literature and Resources	Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) - 14.29 (14.29%) Insightfully and accurately incorporates concepts, terminology, and passage support from multiple course readings and lecture. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 6 (6%) - 11 (11%) Provides a modest use of literature and reading resources in key sections to build understanding and support for statements. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Does not include a sound reference of resource literature, thus assignment is complete with highly subjective thoughts.. Feedback:
Critical Thinking Level	Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) - 14.29 (14.29%) Discussions evidences above-average critical evaluation on major themes, literature, and resources, defining ethnic group's Americanization experience. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 6 (6%) - 11 (11%) Moderate evaluation limited to surface-level analysis, and/or discussions contains too much extraneous information, or concepts usage is absent significant support for main themes. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Lacks an in-depth critical evaluation on ethnic group's Americanization, and/or discussion is too vague or extraneous.elaboration that main thought appear meaningless. Feedback:
Mastery of Materials	Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) - 14.29 (14.29%) Student evidences exceptional, nuanced, comprehensive mastery of material that reflects careful reading and serious thought. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 6 (6%) - 11 (11%) Student has mastered basic premises of material to promote surface-level evaluation. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Student clearly has not read the expanse of materials to make informed arguments, or has not understood even the basic premises. Feedback:
Grammar and Mechanics	Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) - 14.29 (14.29%) Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 6 (6%) - 11 (11%) Essay has few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors allowing reader to follow ideas clearly; include minor grammatical errors. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create distraction, making reading difficult; fragments, comma splices, run-ons evident. Errors are frequent. Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Organization and Structure--

Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 12 (12%) - 14.29 (14.29%) Paper and thoughts are thoroughly organized and structured with precision on targeted theme. Satisfactory 6 (6%) - 11 (11%) Paper has structure, but statements contain too much extraneous information that does not have an obvious relation to the paper theme. Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Paper lacks structure and/or clear organization of thought, thus not clearly aligned with requirements for completion Feedback:

Content and Main Points--

Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 12 (12%) - 14.29 (14.29%) Content evidences a synthesis of ideas, in-depth analysis and original thought in support of topic, and main points developed with high quality. Satisfactory 6 (6%) - 11 (11%) Has evidence of content theme, but contains extraneous or unclear language resulting in difficulty interpreting main points. Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Main points are underdeveloped, and/or includes unclear reasoning. Feedback:

Evaluation on Americanization Experience and Theory--

Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 12 (12%) - 14.29 (14.29%) Provides and insightful and thought provoking evaluation on ethnic group's Americanization experiences integrating into Anglo-American dominant culture. Satisfactory 6 (6%) - 11 (11%) Discussions include a modest understanding ethnic group's Americanization expereinces, but contains too much extraneous information preventing insightful understanding on Americanization access. Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Discussion does not adequately, or completely omits discussion on Americanization experience. Feedback:

Constructive Use of Literature and Resources--

Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 12 (12%) - 14.29 (14.29%) Insightfully and accurately incorporates concepts, terminology, and passage support from multiple course readings and lecture. Satisfactory 6 (6%) - 11 (11%) Provides a modest use of literature and reading resources in key sections to build understanding and support for statements. Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Does not include a sound reference of resource literature, thus assignment is complete with highly subjective thoughts.. Feedback:

Critical Thinking Level--

Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 12 (12%) - 14.29 (14.29%) Discussions evidences above-average critical evaluation on major themes, literature, and resources, defining ethnic group's Americanization experience. Satisfactory 6 (6%) - 11 (11%) Moderate evaluation limited to surface-level analysis, and/or discussions contains too much extraneous information, or concepts usage is absent significant support for main themes. Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Lacks an in-depth critical evaluation on ethnic group's Americanization, and/or discussion is too vague or extraneous.elaboration that main thought appear meaningless. Feedback:

Mastery of Materials--

Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 12 (12%) - 14.29 (14.29%) Student evidences exceptional, nuanced, comprehensive mastery of material that reflects careful reading and serious thought. Satisfactory 6 (6%) - 11 (11%) Student has mastered basic premises of material to promote surface-level evaluation. Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Student clearly has not read the expanse of materials to make informed arguments, or has not understood even the basic premises. Feedback:

Grammar and Mechanics--

Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 12 (12%) - 14.29 (14.29%) Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. Satisfactory 6 (6%) - 11 (11%) Essay has few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors allowing reader to follow ideas clearly; include minor grammatical errors. Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create distraction, making reading difficult; fragments, comma splices, run-ons evident. Errors are frequent. Feedback:

Name:Reflection Assignments Grading Rubric