discussion board

Rubric Detail

Exemplary Proficient NeedsImprovement Not Evident

Comprehension 20 (40%) Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail

17 (34%) Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using adequate organization and detail

11 (22%) Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail

0 (0%) Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea

Timeliness 5 (10%) N/A

5 (10%) Submits initial post on time

2.75 (5.5%) Submits initial post one day late

0 (0%) Submits initial post two or more days late

Engagement 15 (30%) Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail

12.75 (25.5%) Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail

8.25 (16.5%) Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some explanation and detail

0 (0%) Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail

Writing (Mechanics)

10 (20%) Writes posts that are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations

8.5 (17%) Writes posts that are easily understood using proper citation methods where applicable with few errors in citations

5.5 (11%) Writes posts that are understandable using proper citation methods where applicable with a number of errors in citations

0 (0%) Writes posts that others are not able to understand and does not use proper citation methods where applicable

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Name: Discussion Rubric: Undergraduate ExitExit

Grid View List View

citations citations

Name:Discussion Rubric: Undergraduate ExitExit