nursing (Session #12 Community Health Assessment VT Assignment) 2

1/16/22, 5:27 PM Rubric Detail – 202201_Comm and Public Health ...

https://blackboard.gwu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_2357721_1&course_id=_367187_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_84520_1&viewOnly=true&displa… 1/3

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Novice Competent Pro�cient

Assessment overview covering all the major areas accurately

0 (0.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Information incomplete/missing; inadequate evaluation

11 (11.00%) - 20 (20.00%)

Most aspects of the assessment addressed though not thoroughly

21 (21.00%) - 25 (25.00%)

Assessment is thorough, all aspects addressed and the audience has a solid understanding of the community

Community Health Nursing Diagnosis, priority setting

0 (0.00%) - 4 (4.00%)

Community health nursing dx is not evidenced; medical dx used

5 (5.00%) - 7 (7.00%)

Community health nursing dx evidenced, moderately supported with evidence and prioritized

8 (8.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Community health nursing dx evidenced and strongly supported with evidence; appropriately prioritized

Planning and Goals 0 (0.00%) - 4 (4.00%)

Goals are missing numerous elements of SMART criteria for STG and LTG

5 (5.00%) - 7 (7.00%)

Goals are missing 1-2 elements of SMART goal criteria for STG and LTG

8 (8.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

All elements of SMART goal criteria are present for STG and LTG

Name: Community Assessment Presentation via Voice Thread (VT)

Description: This is the grading rubric for Community Assessment Presentation via Voice Thread (VT) Assignment. For most of the parts below, this is a group grade; group member’s grade may vary based on the peer evaluation and posted responses to others on VT. Your work distribution should be spread equally between members: for those in the group who do not present in the Voice Thread (VT) presentation, they should take the lead in development of the VT presentation. Remember, you have learned a great deal about your community from this group work, this is the time to share your expertise and assessment �ndings with your fellow classmates. How you present this information will impact your fellow student’s comprehension of your community’s needs.

Exit

Grid View List View

1/16/22, 5:27 PM Rubric Detail – 202201_Comm and Public Health ...

https://blackboard.gwu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_2357721_1&course_id=_367187_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_84520_1&viewOnly=true&displa… 2/3

  Novice Competent Pro�cientInterventions 0 (0.00%) - 4 (4.00%)

Interventions do not demonstrate to a poor relationship to the dx or goals

5 (5.00%) - 7 (7.00%)

Interventions demonstrate a moderate relationship to the dx and goals

8 (8.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Interventions demonstrate a strong relationship to the dx and goals

Evaluation 0 (0.00%) - 4 (4.00%)

Evaluation present but not related to goals

5 (5.00%) - 7 (7.00%)

Evaluation present, limited detail and moderately related to goals

8 (8.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Evaluation present, detailed and strongly related to goals

Overall Presentation Using VT 0 (0.00%) - 20 (20.00%)

No evidence provided describing various group member’s roles on the project Group members do not appear knowledgeable about the community. PPTs with many formatting errors, no evidence of original images used on slides (i.e. all stock images); selected images do not support/enhance the presentation and/or are of poor quality (i.e. blurry, pixelated images, hard to read fonts and colors, poor audio); missing citations. Group members so not appear to know the content/there are challenges with understanding the presented content APA references/citation with numerous errors.

21 (21.00%) - 28 (28.00%)

Roles of group members on project are clear and included on PPT slide. Group members are knowledgeable about the community; PPTs formatted correctly (i.e. fonts and colors compliment topic but are a bit di�cult to read) with few minor errors; audience able to follow and understand presented content; group has included mostly stock images with some evidence of original images; citations present; images relate to and support presentations APA references/citation with few minor errors.

29 (29.00%) - 35 (35.00%)

Roles of group members on project are clear and included on PPT slide Group members are very knowledgeable about the community; PPTs formatted correctly (i.e. fonts and colors carefully planned and enhance readability) with citations; audience able to follow and understand presented content; group has included a majority of original photos with stock images used to highlight/compliment the presentation; images explain/reinforce content APA references/citation with no more than 2 errors

Name:Community Assessment Presentation via Voice Thread (VT)

Description:This is the grading rubric for Community Assessment Presentation via Voice Thread (VT) Assignment. For most of the parts below, this is a group grade; group member’s grade may vary based on the peer evaluation and posted responses to others on VT. Your work distribution should be spread equally between members: for those in the group who do not present in the Voice Thread (VT) presentation, they should take the lead in development of the VT presentation. Remember, you have learned a great deal about your community from this group work, this is the time to share your expertise and assessment �ndings with your fellow classmates. How you present this information will impact your fellow student’s comprehension of your community’s needs.

Exit

1/16/22, 5:27 PM Rubric Detail – 202201_Comm and Public Health ...

https://blackboard.gwu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_2357721_1&course_id=_367187_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_84520_1&viewOnly=true&displa… 3/3