Annonated Bibiliograph

5/4/2020 Rubric Detail – CMN6080.81386.202035

https://northeastern.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_4039922_1&cour… 1/2

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Novice Competent Pro�cient

Organization of the Presentation

2.52 (21.00%) - 3.024 (25.20%)

Presentation re�ects shallow thinking and lacks information relative to case study.

3.06 (25.50%) - 3.24 (27.00%)

Presentation demonstrates solid thinking across audience analysis, key messages, appropriate channels, and sequence of events.  Plan also re�ects key aspects relative to the case study.

3.276 (27.30%) - 3.6 (30.00%)

Presentation re�ects a very well de�ned communication plan. Plan demonstrates highly critical thinking. Plan fully represents audience analysis, key messages, communication channels, and sequencing of events in a convincing manner.

Content & Evidence

2.52 (21.00%) - 3.024 (25.20%)

Presentation lacks scholarly

3.06 (25.50%) - 3.24 (27.00%)

Presentation utilized

3.276 (27.30%) - 3.6 (30.00%)

Presentation is framed and

Name: Final Presentation

Description: Case Study Analysis Rubric Exit

Grid View List View

su p

p o

rt

5/4/2020 Rubric Detail – CMN6080.81386.202035

https://northeastern.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_4039922_1&cour… 2/2

  Novice Competent Pro�cient

scholarly terminology, de�nitions, or references to the case study.

utilized appropriate terminology, de�nitions, and case study references.

framed and articulated in a way that is highly professional, fully applies the communication concepts discussed in class, and is rich in references to the case study and/or scholarly articles.

Professionalism 2.1 (17.50%) - 2.52 (21.00%)

Presentation contains multiple errors in grammar and punctuation. Does not meet the length speci�cations of the assignment. Document was submitted late.

2.55 (21.25%) - 2.7 (22.50%)

Presentation does not consistently follow appropriate style and/or format.

2.73 (22.75%) - 3 (25.00%)

Professionally presented with minor errors, easy to follow

Creativity 1.26 (10.50%) - 1.512 (12.60%)

Dry presentation

1.53 (12.75%) - 1.62 (13.50%)

Mildly engaging

1.638 (13.65%) - 1.8 (15.00%)

Engaging the audience

Name:Final Presentation

Description:Case Study Analysis Rubric Exit

su p

p o

rt