Annotated Bibliography 2
Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Superior Competent Unatisfactory
DESCRIPTION/ SUMMARY
37.2 (24.80%) - 40 (26.66666%)
Summarizes the key points of the articles or research studies.
34 (22.66666%) - 37.19 (24.79333%)
Majority of key points are addressed
0 (0.00%) - 33.9 (22.60%)
Key points of the articles lack substance and/or are unevenly addressed.
CRITIQUE/ EVALUATION of Individual Articles
32.55 (21.70%) - 35 (23.33333%)
Creditability of the author/ researchers. Evaluates the practicality of the research. Does it add to the body of knowledge? Is the source peer- reviewed? Are the conclusions substantiated by information /data in the article.
29.75 (19.83333%) - 32.54 (21.69333%)
Evaluation of the creditability and practicality of the research is uneven in spots. Journals are peer-reviewed.
0 (0.00%) - 29.74 (19.82666%)
Critique and evaluation lack substance. Minimal number of sources from peer-reviewed journals
Proposed Diagnosis/Intervention
23.25 (15.50%) - 25 (16.66666%)
Planned interventions are appropriately focused on supporting outcome
21.25 (14.16666%) - 23.24 (15.49333%)
Planned interventions appropriately focused on supporting outcome
0 (0.00%) - 21.24 (14.16%)
The planned interventions do not support the identi�ed outcome attainment. The
Name: Annotated Bibliography Rubric -
Description: Students will utilize the objective they selected from health People 2030 and provide citations that focus on interventions eliminating health disparities and/or correcting negative in�uences of social determinants of health.
Exit
Grid View List View
9/15/24, 6:46 AM Rubric Detail – Clinical issues for Adv. Nurs_2024FA
https://newlearn.govst.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_454962_1&course_id=_22481_1&maxValue=… 1/2
Superior Competent Unatisfactory
attainment and are suitable and feasible for the population.
attainment. but are minimally suitable and feasible for the population
intervention is not suitable nor feasible for the identi�ed population.
Writes a conclusion paragraph that compares the strengths/weaknesses of all the articles reviewed and discusses their relevancy to the chosen issue/population
27.9 (18.60%) - 30 (20.00%)
Verbalizes how the selected articles together are relevant to the issue.
25.5 (17.00%) - 27.89 (18.59333%)
Some discussion of how the articles are relevant to the identi�ed topic
0 (0.00%) - 25.49 (16.99333%)
Minimal discussion of how articles are relevant to the proposed paper and project.
APA FORMAT. GRAMMAR, PUNCTUATION,
18.6 (12.40%) - 20 (13.33333%)
Uses a mixture of research studies and articles. >3 must be research studies. Citations cited per APA guidelines. Bib summaries are well- written. Paragraphs are well written. Three or less grammatical, punctuation or typing errors.
17 (11.33333%) - 18.59 (12.39333%)
Uses a mixture of research studies and articles. 3 must be research studies. Citations cited per APA guidelines are current. Bib summaries are well- written. Paragraphs are well written. Five or less grammatical, punctuation or typing errors.
0 (0.00%) - 16.9 (11.26666%)
Uses a mixture of research studies and articles. 3 must be research studies. Citations cited per APA guidelines. Some older than 8 years Bib summaries are well-written. Paragraphs are well written. Five or less grammatical, punctuation or typing errors.
Name:Annotated Bibliography Rubric -
Description:Students will utilize the objective they selected from health People 2030 and provide citations that focus on interventions eliminating health disparities and/or correcting negative in�uences of social determinants of health.
Exit
9/15/24, 6:46 AM Rubric Detail – Clinical issues for Adv. Nurs_2024FA
https://newlearn.govst.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_454962_1&course_id=_22481_1&maxValue=… 2/2