Menu Selection

Unacceptable Needs Improvement Competent Exemplary

Evaluate the user dialog strategies used by a menu- driven interface.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the user dialog strategies used by a menu-driven interface.

12 (15.00%) Partially evaluated the user dialog strategies used by a menu-driven interface.

13.6 (17.00%) Satisfactorily evaluated the user dialog strategies used by a menu-driven interface.

16 (20.00%) Thoroughly evaluated the user dialog strategies used by a menu-driven interface.

Determine why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely determined why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age.

12 (15.00%) Partially determined why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age.

13.6 (17.00%) Satisfactorily determined why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age.

16 (20.00%) Thoroughly determined why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age.

Suggest at least three strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely suggested at least three strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment.

12 (15.00%) Partially suggested at least three strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment.

13.6 (17.00%) Satisfactorily suggested at least three strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment.

16 (20.00%) Thoroughly suggested at least three strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment.

Suggest alternatives for menu-driven interface design and explain how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely suggested alternatives for menu-driven interface design; did not submit or incompletely explained how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces.

15 (18.75%) Partially suggested alternatives for menu-driven interface design; partially explained how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces.

17 (21.25%) Satisfactorily suggested alternatives for menu-driven interface design; satisfactorily explained how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu- driven interfaces.

20 (25.00%) Thoroughly suggested alternatives for menu-driven interface design; thoroughly explained how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces.

Three references. 0 (0.00%) No references provided.

3 (3.75%) Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor-quality choices.

3.4 (4.25%) Meets number of required references; all references high- quality choices.

4 (5.00%) Exceeds number of required references; all references high- quality choices.

Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. 0 (0.00%) More than 6 errors present.

6 (7.50%) 5-6 errors present.

6.8 (8.50%) 3-4 errors present.

8 (10.00%) 0-2 errors present.

Name: w06a1

Description: w06a1 - Menu Selection ExitExit

Grid View List View

Name:w06a1

Description:w06a1 - Menu Selection ExitExit