Case Study – Design Process

Unacceptable Needs Improvement Competent Exemplary

Suggest the prototyping technique you would use for this system and support your rationale.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely suggested the prototyping technique you would use for this system; did not submit or incompletely supported your rationale.

10.125 (11.25%) Partially suggested the prototyping technique you would use for this system; partially supported your rationale.

11.475 (12.75%) Satisfactorily suggested the prototyping technique you would use for this system; satisfactorily supported your rationale.

13.5 (15.00%) Thoroughly suggested the prototyping technique you would use for this system; thoroughly supported your rationale.

Create a management plan containing eight to ten stages for proper design of such a system.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely created a management plan containing eight to ten stages for proper design of such a system.

10.125 (11.25%) Partially created a management plan containing eight to ten stages for proper design of such a system.

11.475 (12.75%) Satisfactorily created a management plan containing eight to ten stages for proper design of such a system.

13.5 (15.00%) Thoroughly created a management plan containing eight to ten stages for proper design of such a system.

Explain each stage of the management plan and justify your rationale.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely explained each stage of the management plan and did not submit or incompletely justified your rationale.

10.125 (11.25%) Partially explained each stage of the management plan and partially justified your rationale.

11.475 (12.75%) Satisfactorily explained each stage of the management plan and satisfactorily justified your rationale.

13.5 (15.00%) Thoroughly explained each stage of the management plan and thoroughly justified your rationale.

Estimate the length of time it will take to complete each stage of the management plan.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely estimated the length of time it will take to complete each stage of the management plan.

10.125 (11.25%) Partially estimated the length of time it will take to complete each stage of the management plan.

11.475 (12.75%) Satisfactorily estimated the length of time it will take to complete each stage of the management plan.

13.5 (15.00%) Thoroughly estimated the length of time it will take to complete each stage of the management plan.

Compare and contrast the self-check-in interface with the interface a receptionist would use.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the self-check-in interface with the interface a receptionist would use.

10.125 (11.25%) Partially compared and contrasted the self-check-in interface with the interface a receptionist would use.

11.475 (12.75%) Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the self-check-in interface with the interface a receptionist would use.

13.5 (15.00%) Thoroughly compared and contrasted the self-check-in interface with the interface a receptionist would use.

Use Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a total of two graphical representations of your proposed interfaces, one for the self-check-in and one for the receptionist.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a total of two graphical representations of your proposed interfaces, one for the self- check-in and one for the receptionist.

6.75 (7.50%) Partially used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a total of two graphical representations of your proposed interfaces, one for the self-check-in and one for the receptionist.

7.65 (8.50%) Satisfactorily used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a total of two graphical representations of your proposed interfaces, one for the self- check-in and one for the receptionist.

9 (10.00%) Thoroughly used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a total of two graphical representations of your proposed interfaces, one for the self- check-in and one for the receptionist.

Three references. 0 (0.00%) No references provided.

3.375 (3.75%) Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

3.825 (4.25%) Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

4.5 (5.00%) Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. 0 (0.00%) More than 6 errors present.

6.75 (7.50%) 5-6 errors present.

7.65 (8.50%) 3-4 errors present.

9 (10.00%) 0-2 errors present.

Name: w04a1

Description: w04a1 - Case Study - Design Process ExitExit

Grid View List View

Name:w04a1

Description:w04a1 - Case Study - Design Process ExitExit