CASE STUDY - SECURITY

Unacceptable Needs Improvement Competent Exemplary

Analyze the new system and determine the design issues with this new system.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the new system and did not submit or incompletely determined the design issues with this new system.

11.25 (11.25%) Partially analyzed the new system and partially determined the design issues with this new system.

12.75 (12.75%) Satisfactorily analyzed the new system and satisfactorily determined the design issues with this new system.

15 (15.00%) Thoroughly analyzed the new system and thoroughly determined the design issues with this new system.

Describe how you would correct the design issues with the system to make the restaurant managers happy.

0 (0.00%) d not submit or incompletely described how you would correct the design issues with the system to make the restaurant managers happy.

11.25 (11.25%) Partially described how you would correct the design issues with the system to make the restaurant managers happy.

12.75 (12.75%) DiPartially described how you would correct the design issues with the system to make the restaurant managers happy.

15 (15.00%) Thoroughly described how you would correct the design issues with the system to make the restaurant managers happy.

Create a design plan that lists and explains the tasks associated with improving this interface.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that lists and explains the tasks associated with improving this interface.

2.25 (2.25%) Partially created a design plan that lists and explains the tasks associated with improving this interface.

2.55 (2.55%) Satisfactorily created a design plan that lists and explains the tasks associated with improving this interface.

3 (3.00%) Thoroughly created a design plan that lists and explains the tasks associated with improving this interface.

Create a design plan that contains at least six tasks. 0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that contains at least six tasks.

2.25 (2.25%) Partially created a design plan that contains at least six tasks.

2.55 (2.55%) Satisfactorily created a design plan that contains at least six tasks.

3 (3.00%) Thoroughly created a design plan that contains at least six tasks.

Create a design plan that includes realistic time estimates for each task to be completed.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that includes realistic time estimates for each task to be completed.

2.25 (2.25%) Partially created a design plan that includes realistic time estimates for each task to be completed.

2.55 (2.55%) Satisfactorily created a design plan that includes realistic time estimates for each task to be completed.

3 (3.00%) Thoroughly created a design plan that includes realistic time estimates for each task to be completed.

Create a design plan that analyzes the development of the system in your plan.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that analyzes the development of the system in your plan.

1.5 (1.50%) Partially created a design plan that analyzes the development of the system in your plan.

1.7 (1.70%) Satisfactorily created a design plan that analyzes the development of the system in your plan.

2 (2.00%) Thoroughly created a design plan that analyzes the development of the system in your plan.

Create a design plan that analyzes the testing of the system in your plan.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that analyzes the testing of the system in your plan.

1.5 (1.50%) Partially created a design plan that analyzes the testing of the system in your plan.

1.7 (1.70%) Satisfactorily created a design plan that analyzes the testing of the system in your plan.

2 (2.00%) Thoroughly created a design plan that analyzes the testing of the system in your plan.

Create a design plan that analyzes the implementation of the system in your plan.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely created a design plan that analyzes the implementation of the system in your plan.

1.5 (1.50%) Partially created a design plan that analyzes the implementation of the system in your plan.

1.7 (1.70%) Satisfactorily created a design plan that analyzes the implementation of the system in your plan.

2 (2.00%) Thoroughly created a design plan that analyzes the implementation of the system in your plan.

Examine how this system balanced security and usability, and explain the challenges of incorporating system security and system usability into a design.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely examined how this system balanced security and usability and did not submit or incompletely explained the challenges of incorporating system security and system usability into a design.

11.25 (11.25%) Partially examined how this system balanced security and usability and partially explained the challenges of incorporating system security and system usability into a design.

12.75 (12.75%) Satisfactorily examined how this system balanced security and usability and satisfactorily explained the challenges of incorporating system security and system usability into a design.

15 (15.00%) Thoroughly examined how this system balanced security and usability and thoroughly explained the challenges of incorporating system security and system usability into a design.

Suggest changes that could be made to the security of this system to still meet security objectives but make the system more usable.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely suggested changes that could be made to the security of this system to still meet security objectives but make the system more usable.

11.25 (11.25%) Partially suggested changes that could be made to the security of this system to still meet security objectives but make the system more usable.

12.75 (12.75%) Satisfactorily suggested changes that could be made to the security of this system to still meet security objectives but make the system more usable.

15 (15.00%) Thoroughly suggested changes that could be made to the security of this system to still meet security objectives but make the system more usable.

Use Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a graphical representation of your proposed interface.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or incompletely used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a graphical representation of your proposed interface.

7.5 (7.50%) Partially used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a graphical representation of your proposed interface.

8.5 (8.50%) Satisfactorily used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a graphical representation of your proposed interface.

10 (10.00%) Thoroughly used Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative, Dia, to create a graphical representation of your proposed interface.

Three references. 0 (0.00%) No references provided.

3.75 (3.75%) Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor-quality choices.

4.25 (4.25%) Meets number of required references; all references high- quality choices.

5 (5.00%) Exceeds number of required references; all references high- quality choices.

Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. 0 (0.00%) More than 6 errors present.

7.5 (7.50%) 5-6 errors present.

8.5 (8.50%) 3-4 errors present.

10 (10.00%) 0-2 errors present.

Name: w07a1

Description: w07a1 - Case Study - Security ExitExit

Grid View List View

Name:w07a1

Description:w07a1 - Case Study - Security ExitExit