Data-driven decision making
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: DDHA_8800_Week7_Assignment_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Not Done | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formulates mechanical heart optimization problem (#36), recommending how to minimize cost | Points: Points Range: 11 (18.33%) - 12 (20%) Correctly formulates mechanical heart optimization problem (#36), recommending how to minimize cost Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 9 (15%) - 10 (16.67%) Formulates mechanical heart optimization problem (#36), recommending how to minimize cost with some accuracy Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 1 (1.67%) - 8 (13.33%) Formulates mechanical heart optimization problem (#36), recommending how to minimize cost with little accuracy Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not formulate mechanical heart optimization problem (#36), recommending how to minimize cost Feedback: |
| Uses Solver/Solver table to correctly address part b of mechanical heart problem | Points: Points Range: 11 (18.33%) - 12 (20%) Uses Solver/Solver table to correctly address part b of mechanical heart problem Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 9 (15%) - 10 (16.67%) Uses Solver/Solver table to address part b of mechanical heart problem with some accuracy Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 1 (1.67%) - 8 (13.33%) Uses Solver/Solver table to address part b of mechanical heart problem with little accuracy Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not use Solver/Solver table to address part b of mechanical heart problem Feedback: |
| Formulates pharmaceutical problem (#42), recommending how to minimize cost | Points: Points Range: 11 (18.33%) - 12 (20%) Correctly formulates pharmaceutical problem (#42), recommending how to minimize cost Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 9 (15%) - 10 (16.67%) Formulates pharmaceutical problem (#42), recommending how to minimize cost with some accuracy Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 1 (1.67%) - 8 (13.33%) Formulates pharmaceutical problem (#42), recommending how to minimize cost with little accuracy Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not formulate pharmaceutical problem (#42), recommending how to minimize cost Feedback: |
| Uses Solver/Solver table to correctly address part b of mechanical heart problem | Points: Points Range: 11 (18.33%) - 12 (20%) Uses Solver / Solver table to correctly address part b of mechnical heart problem Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 9 (15%) - 10 (16.67%) Uses Solver/Solver table to address part b of mechanical heart problem with some accuracy Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 1 (1.67%) - 8 (13.33%) Uses Solver/Solver table to address part b of mechanical heart problem with little accuracy Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not use Solver/Solver table to address part b of mechanical heart problem Feedback: |
| Professional Document that is APA Compliant | Points: Points Range: 11 (18.33%) - 12 (20%) Writing is organized, concise, and scholarly written with no grammatical errors. Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to fully develop ideas. Meets all APA format, citations, and structure requirements. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 9 (15%) - 10 (16.67%) Writing is organized, concise, and scholarly written with minimal to no grammatical errors. Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to support ideas. Minimal to no errors in APA format, citations, and structure. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 1 (1.67%) - 8 (13.33%) Writing is unclear or interrupted by grammatical errors. Demonstrates some use of credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas. Moderate errors in APA format, citations, and structure. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Writing lacks clarity, organization and has significant grammatical errors. Demonstrates minimal use of sources to support ideas. Significant errors in APA format, citations, and structure. Or no citing of sources. Feedback: |
Formulates mechanical heart optimization problem (#36), recommending how to minimize cost--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 11 (18.33%) - 12 (20%) Correctly formulates mechanical heart optimization problem (#36), recommending how to minimize cost Good 9 (15%) - 10 (16.67%) Formulates mechanical heart optimization problem (#36), recommending how to minimize cost with some accuracy Fair 1 (1.67%) - 8 (13.33%) Formulates mechanical heart optimization problem (#36), recommending how to minimize cost with little accuracy Not Done 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not formulate mechanical heart optimization problem (#36), recommending how to minimize cost Feedback:Uses Solver/Solver table to correctly address part b of mechanical heart problem--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 11 (18.33%) - 12 (20%) Uses Solver/Solver table to correctly address part b of mechanical heart problem Good 9 (15%) - 10 (16.67%) Uses Solver/Solver table to address part b of mechanical heart problem with some accuracy Fair 1 (1.67%) - 8 (13.33%) Uses Solver/Solver table to address part b of mechanical heart problem with little accuracy Not Done 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not use Solver/Solver table to address part b of mechanical heart problem Feedback:Formulates pharmaceutical problem (#42), recommending how to minimize cost--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 11 (18.33%) - 12 (20%) Correctly formulates pharmaceutical problem (#42), recommending how to minimize cost Good 9 (15%) - 10 (16.67%) Formulates pharmaceutical problem (#42), recommending how to minimize cost with some accuracy Fair 1 (1.67%) - 8 (13.33%) Formulates pharmaceutical problem (#42), recommending how to minimize cost with little accuracy Not Done 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not formulate pharmaceutical problem (#42), recommending how to minimize cost Feedback:Uses Solver/Solver table to correctly address part b of mechanical heart problem--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 11 (18.33%) - 12 (20%) Uses Solver / Solver table to correctly address part b of mechnical heart problem Good 9 (15%) - 10 (16.67%) Uses Solver/Solver table to address part b of mechanical heart problem with some accuracy Fair 1 (1.67%) - 8 (13.33%) Uses Solver/Solver table to address part b of mechanical heart problem with little accuracy Not Done 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not use Solver/Solver table to address part b of mechanical heart problem Feedback:Professional Document that is APA Compliant--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 11 (18.33%) - 12 (20%) Writing is organized, concise, and scholarly written with no grammatical errors. Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to fully develop ideas. Meets all APA format, citations, and structure requirements. Good 9 (15%) - 10 (16.67%) Writing is organized, concise, and scholarly written with minimal to no grammatical errors. Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to support ideas. Minimal to no errors in APA format, citations, and structure. Fair 1 (1.67%) - 8 (13.33%) Writing is unclear or interrupted by grammatical errors. Demonstrates some use of credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas. Moderate errors in APA format, citations, and structure. Not Done 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Writing lacks clarity, organization and has significant grammatical errors. Demonstrates minimal use of sources to support ideas. Significant errors in APA format, citations, and structure. Or no citing of sources. Feedback:| Total Points: 60 |
|---|
Name: DDHA_8800_Week7_Assignment_Rubric