MD3 DISCCUSION 2

Candyy31

RubricDetailBlackboardLearnMOD3DISCUSSION.html

Home >Education homework help >MD3 DISCCUSION 2

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: EDSD_7900_Module3_Discussion2_Rubric

	Unacceptable Graduate-Level Work	Minimal Graduate-Level Work	Advanced Graduate-Level Work	Exemplary Advanced Graduate-Level Work
Initial Discussion Post	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3.5 (34.99%) Post is vague, incomplete, or demonstrates a low level of thinking. Post is posted after the due date, or it is off-task from the instructions. Post includes information from resources but does not include appropriate APA in-text citations and references. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (35%) - 4 (40%) Post is acceptable but does not consistently demonstrate higher-order thinking. Post is posted by the due date, but does not address all components of the instructions. Post includes information from resources and notes either an incomplete APA in-text citation or reference. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (40%) - 4.5 (45%) Post is clear, easy to understand, and demonstrates higher-order thinking. Post is posted by the due date, and addresses all components of the instructions. Post includes information from resources and uses APA in-text citations and references when appropriate. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4.5 (45%) - 5 (50%) Post is original, thought provoking, and stimulates inquiry, investigation, and higher-order thinking. Post is posted by the due date, and exceeds the expectations of the instructions. Post includes information from resources and uses APA in-text citations and references when appropriate to effectively support assertions and build on collaborative learning opportunities. Feedback:
Discussion Response Post	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3.5 (34.99%) Posts are vague, incomplete, or demonstrate a low-level of thinking. Posts are posted after the due date or they are off-task from the assignment instructions. Posts include information from resources but do not include appropriate APA in-text citations and references. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (35%) - 4 (40%) Posts are acceptable, but they do not consistently demonstrate higher-order thinking. Posts are posted by the due date, but they do not address all components of the instructions. Posts include information from resources and note either an incomplete APA in-text citation or reference. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (40%) - 4.5 (45%) Posts are clear, easy to understand, and demonstrate higher-order thinking. Posts are posted by the due date, and they address all components of the instructions. Posts include information from resources and use APA in-text citations and references when appropriate. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4.5 (45%) - 5 (50%) Posts are original, thought provoking, and stimulate inquiry and investigation. Posts are posted by the due date, and they exceed the expectations of the instructions. Posts include information from resources and use APA in-text citations and references when appropriate to effectively support assertions and build on collaborative learning opportunities. Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Initial Discussion Post--

Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Graduate-Level Work 0 (0%) - 3.5 (34.99%) Post is vague, incomplete, or demonstrates a low level of thinking. Post is posted after the due date, or it is off-task from the instructions. Post includes information from resources but does not include appropriate APA in-text citations and references. Minimal Graduate-Level Work 3.5 (35%) - 4 (40%) Post is acceptable but does not consistently demonstrate higher-order thinking. Post is posted by the due date, but does not address all components of the instructions. Post includes information from resources and notes either an incomplete APA in-text citation or reference. Advanced Graduate-Level Work 4 (40%) - 4.5 (45%) Post is clear, easy to understand, and demonstrates higher-order thinking. Post is posted by the due date, and addresses all components of the instructions. Post includes information from resources and uses APA in-text citations and references when appropriate. Exemplary Advanced Graduate-Level Work 4.5 (45%) - 5 (50%) Post is original, thought provoking, and stimulates inquiry, investigation, and higher-order thinking. Post is posted by the due date, and exceeds the expectations of the instructions. Post includes information from resources and uses APA in-text citations and references when appropriate to effectively support assertions and build on collaborative learning opportunities. Feedback:

Discussion Response Post--

Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Graduate-Level Work 0 (0%) - 3.5 (34.99%) Posts are vague, incomplete, or demonstrate a low-level of thinking. Posts are posted after the due date or they are off-task from the assignment instructions. Posts include information from resources but do not include appropriate APA in-text citations and references. Minimal Graduate-Level Work 3.5 (35%) - 4 (40%) Posts are acceptable, but they do not consistently demonstrate higher-order thinking. Posts are posted by the due date, but they do not address all components of the instructions. Posts include information from resources and note either an incomplete APA in-text citation or reference. Advanced Graduate-Level Work 4 (40%) - 4.5 (45%) Posts are clear, easy to understand, and demonstrate higher-order thinking. Posts are posted by the due date, and they address all components of the instructions. Posts include information from resources and use APA in-text citations and references when appropriate. Exemplary Advanced Graduate-Level Work 4.5 (45%) - 5 (50%) Posts are original, thought provoking, and stimulate inquiry and investigation. Posts are posted by the due date, and they exceed the expectations of the instructions. Posts include information from resources and use APA in-text citations and references when appropriate to effectively support assertions and build on collaborative learning opportunities. Feedback: