8085 MOD 2 ASSIGNMENT

Candyy31

RubricDetailBlackboardLearn8085MOD2ASSIGN.html

Home >Education homework help >8085 MOD 2 ASSIGNMENT

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: EDDD_8085_Module_2_Assignment_Rubric

Description: EDSD 7085 Assignment Module 2 Rubric

	Novice	Emerging	Proficient	Advanced
Development of Others. Create a tool or artifact that summarizes an experience for developing others’ leadership capacity and knowledge/skills related to the topic you chose.	Points: 1.2 (20%) The tool or artifact provides limited details regarding an experience for developing others’ leadership capacity and/or knowledge/skills. The tool or artifact is not related to the topic. Information from scholarly sources to support the experience is missing. Feedback:	Points: 2.4 (40%) The tool or artifact provides limited details regarding an experience for developing others’ leadership capacity and knowledge/skills related to the topic. There is limited information from scholarly sources to support the experience. Feedback:	Points: 3.6 (60%) The tool or artifact clearly summarizing an experience for developing others’ leadership capacity and knowledge/skills related to the topic. Support from literature is included with appropriate citations and references. Feedback:	Points: 4.8 (80%) The tool or artifact provides extensive detail for a rich experience for developing others’ leadership capacity and knowledge/skills related to the topic. There is a clear connection, supported with details, between the experience and an analysis of how the experience enhances leadership capacity is provided. Literature support is strong, creative, and well documented. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting. The extent to which scholarly, critical, analytical writing is presented in APA format and standard edited English with correct grammar and mechanics.	Points: .3 (5%) The quality of writing, APA formatting, or both are minimally acceptable for advanced graduate-level work. Major points are minimally represented but do not reflect appropriate elements of communication. The writing has many grammatical or mechanical errors. Feedback:	Points: .6 (10%) The writing somewhat represents scholarly, advanced graduate-level writing. It generally follows APA style, but the elements of effective communication are not included. Ideas are somewhat clearly and concisely expressed. The writing shows more than a few grammatical or mechanical errors. Feedback:	Points: .9 (15%) The work is well organized and uses mostly correct APA formatting throughout. The elements of effective communication are included. Ideas are clearly and concisely expressed with few, if any, grammatical or mechanical errors. Feedback:	Points: 1.2 (20%) The work represents scholarly writing in correct APA format with effective sentence variety and clear, concise, powerful expression. The entire piece is well organized. The work is unified around a central purpose with well-developed ideas that are logically organized in paragraph structures with clear transitions and proper grammar. Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Development of Others. Create a tool or artifact that summarizes an experience for developing others’ leadership capacity and knowledge/skills related to the topic you chose.--

Levels of Achievement: Novice 1.2 (20%) points The tool or artifact provides limited details regarding an experience for developing others’ leadership capacity and/or knowledge/skills. The tool or artifact is not related to the topic. Information from scholarly sources to support the experience is missing. Emerging 2.4 (40%) points The tool or artifact provides limited details regarding an experience for developing others’ leadership capacity and knowledge/skills related to the topic. There is limited information from scholarly sources to support the experience. Proficient 3.6 (60%) points The tool or artifact clearly summarizing an experience for developing others’ leadership capacity and knowledge/skills related to the topic. Support from literature is included with appropriate citations and references. Advanced 4.8 (80%) points The tool or artifact provides extensive detail for a rich experience for developing others’ leadership capacity and knowledge/skills related to the topic. There is a clear connection, supported with details, between the experience and an analysis of how the experience enhances leadership capacity is provided. Literature support is strong, creative, and well documented. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting. The extent to which scholarly, critical, analytical writing is presented in APA format and standard edited English with correct grammar and mechanics.--

Levels of Achievement: Novice .3 (5%) points The quality of writing, APA formatting, or both are minimally acceptable for advanced graduate-level work. Major points are minimally represented but do not reflect appropriate elements of communication. The writing has many grammatical or mechanical errors. Emerging .6 (10%) points The writing somewhat represents scholarly, advanced graduate-level writing. It generally follows APA style, but the elements of effective communication are not included. Ideas are somewhat clearly and concisely expressed. The writing shows more than a few grammatical or mechanical errors. Proficient .9 (15%) points The work is well organized and uses mostly correct APA formatting throughout. The elements of effective communication are included. Ideas are clearly and concisely expressed with few, if any, grammatical or mechanical errors. Advanced 1.2 (20%) points The work represents scholarly writing in correct APA format with effective sentence variety and clear, concise, powerful expression. The entire piece is well organized. The work is unified around a central purpose with well-developed ideas that are logically organized in paragraph structures with clear transitions and proper grammar. Feedback: