Assignment: Analysis of Development Theories
6/14/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16845494_1&rubric_id=_2397142_1 1/3
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Responsiveness to Directions
13.5 (27%) - 15 (30%)
Assignment fully addresses all instruction prompts.
12 (24%) - 13.48 (26.97%) Assignment addresses most of the instruction prompts; however, one or more prompts may have been insu�ciently addressed.
10.5 (21%) - 11.98 (23.97%) Assignment addresses some of the instructions prompts, but may have missed several prompts or did not su�ciently address the majority of prompts.
0 (0%) - 10.48 (20.97%)
Assignment does not address the majority of instruction prompts and/or insu�ciently addresses all instruction prompts.
Name: SOCW_6200_Week3_Assignment_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
6/14/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16845494_1&rubric_id=_2397142_1 2/3
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Content 18 (36%) - 20 (40%) Paper demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper provides signi�cant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas. Paper demonstrates exemplary critical thought.
16 (32%) - 17.98 (35.96%) Paper demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas. Paper demonstrates good critical thought.
14 (28%) - 15.98 (31.96%) Paper demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and speci�city and/or may not include su�cient pertinent examples or provide su�cient evidence from the readings. Paper demonstrates some critical thought.
0 (0%) - 13.98 (27.96%)
Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper is missing detail and speci�city and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide su�cient evidence from the readings. Paper demonstrates poor critical thought.
6/14/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16845494_1&rubric_id=_2397142_1 3/3
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Writing 13.5 (27%) - 15 (30%)
Assignment is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style. Assignment contains multiple, appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment.
12 (24%) - 13.48 (26.97%) Assignment is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style. Assignment may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources.
10.5 (21%) - 11.98 (23.97%) Assignment is somewhat below graduate level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Assignment may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Assignment may contain inferior resources (number or quality).
0 (0%) - 10.48 (20.97%)
Assignment is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Assignment may contain few or no quality resources.
Name: SOCW_6200_Week3_Assignment_Rubric
EXIT