Asignment 2: Communicating Science and Health Research Paper

5/11/21, 7(59 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 1 of 3https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16811594_1&rubric_id=_2237518_1

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations Very Good Outstanding

Explanation of how you would address each bullet point in the “Setting the Stage” and “Describing the Science” section of the NIH Tool: “A Checklist for Communicating Science and Health Research to the Public” if you were summarizing your selected primary research article for the general public

0 (0%) - 23 (28.75%)

Missing, unoriginal, or did not adequately explain how you would address each bullet point in the “Setting the Stage” and “Describing the Science” section of the NIH Tool: “A Checklist for Communicating Science and Health Research to the Public” if you were summarizing your selected primary research article for the general public

24 (30%) - 26 (32.5%)

Adequate and supported explanation of how you would address each bullet point in the “Setting the Stage” and “Describing the Science” section of the NIH Tool: “A Checklist for Communicating Science and Health Research to the Public” if you were summarizing your selected primary research article for the general public, but with infrequent and minor issues

27 (33.75%) - 28 (35%)

Generally thorough, well organized and supported explanation of how you would address each bullet point in the “Setting the Stage” and “Describing the Science” section of the NIH Tool: “A Checklist for Communicating Science and Health Research to the Public” if you were summarizing your selected primary research article for the general public, with minimal

29 (36.25%) - 30 (37.5%)

Fully developed and supported, insightful, and scholarly explanation of how you would address each bullet point in the “Setting the Stage” and “Describing the Science” section of the NIH Tool: “A Checklist for Communicating Science and Health Research to the Public” if you were summarizing your selected primary research article for the general public

Name: PUBH_6128_Module6_Assignment2_Rubric

Description: PUBH 6128D Module 6 Assignment 2 Rubric Criteria: Adherence to Assignment Expectations (see course for details)

EXIT

Grid View List View

5/11/21, 7(59 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 2 of 3https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16811594_1&rubric_id=_2237518_1

concerns

Includes a one page summary of the article that could be published in a newspaper or in an online article available for review by the general public

0 (0%) - 23 (28.75%)

Missing, unoriginal, or did not adequately provide a 1 page summary of the article that could be published in a newspaper or in an online article available for review by the general public

24 (30%) - 26 (32.5%)

Adequate and supported one page summary of the article that could be published in a newspaper or in an online article available for review by the general public, but with infrequent and minor issues

27 (33.75%) - 28 (35%)

Generally thorough, well organized and supported one page summary of the article that could be published in a newspaper or in an online article available for review by the general public, with minimal concerns

29 (36.25%) - 30 (37.5%)

Fully developed and supported, insightful, and scholarly one page summary of the article that could be published in a newspaper or in an online article available for review by the general public

Written Communication: Extent to which writing, title page, and reference list is professional, appropriate, clear, properly formatted, grammatically and structurally correct, synthesized, supported, and scholarly

0 (0%) - 15 (18.75%)

Writing does not meet basic expectations for a paper (e.g. clarity, tone, organization, grammar, spelling, punctuation, format, source citation, references, synthesis of source material, insufficient originality, etc.).

16 (20%) - 17 (21.25%)

Adequately meets writing expectations for a paper, but with infrequent and minor issues

18 (22.5%) - 18 (22.5%)

Writing is generally sound, structurally and grammatically correct, and properly formatted, with minimal concerns. Synthesis is demonstrated and ideas are supported without reliance on quoting.

19 (23.75%) - 20 (25%)

Writing is fully developed, exceptionally well organized, synthesized, supported, scholarly, and free of writing errors. Concepts are connected throughout paper with appropriate transitions and multiple appropriate resources and examples.

Total Points: 80

Name: PUBH_6128_Module6_Assignment2_Rubric

5/11/21, 7(59 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 3 of 3https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16811594_1&rubric_id=_2237518_1

Description: PUBH 6128D Module 6 Assignment 2 Rubric Criteria: Adherence to Assignment Expectations (see course for details)

EXIT