Opioids the community is Cobb county

profileShaunglazier
RubricDetailBlackboardLearn1.pdf

1/30/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767121_1&rubric_id=_2031348_1 1/3

  Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations Very Good Outstanding

Explanation of public health issue and target population. (10 points)

0 (0%) - 7 (7%) Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately ex[plain a public health issue and target population

8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Adequate explanation and support of a public health issue and target population, but with infrequent and minor issues

9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Generally thorough, well organized, and supported explanation of a public health issue and target population with minimal concerns

10 (10%) - 10 (10%) Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly explanation of a public health issue and target population

Explanation of the theory/model to be employed in addressing this issue and why you chose this theory/model. (10 points)

0 (0%) - 7 (7%) Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately explain theory/model to be employed in addressing this issue and why you chose this theory/model

8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Adequate explanation and support of the theory/model to be employed in addressing this issue and why you chose this theory/model, but with infrequent and minor issues

9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Generally thorough, well organized, and supported explanation of theory/model to be employed in addressing this issue and why you chose this theory/model with minimal concerns

10 (10%) - 10 (10%) Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly explanation of theory/model to be employed in addressing this issue and why you chose this theory/model

Name: PUBH6038_Module6_Assignment_Rubric

Description: Criteria: Adherence to Assignment Expectations (see course for details)

EXITGrid View List View

1/30/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767121_1&rubric_id=_2031348_1 2/3

  Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations Very Good Outstanding

Explanation of constructs of the chosen theory/model and how they apply to your community issue. (20 points)

0 (0%) - 15 (15%) Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately explain constructs of the chosen theory/model and how they apply to your community issue

16 (16%) - 17 (17%) Adequate explanation and support of constructs of the chosen theory/model and how they apply to your community issue, but with infrequent and minor issues

18 (18%) - 18 (18%) Generally thorough, well organized, and supported explanation of constructs of the chosen theory/model and how they apply to your community issue, but with infrequent and minor issues with minimal concerns

19 (19%) - 20 (20%) Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly explanation of constructs of the chosen theory/model and how they apply to your community issue

Description of your intervention for each construct. (20 points)

0 (0%) - 15 (15%) Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately describe your intervention for each construct

16 (16%) - 17 (17%) Adequate description and support of your intervention for each construct, but with infrequent and minor issues

18 (18%) - 18 (18%) Generally thorough, well organized, and supported description of your intervention for each construct with minimal concerns

19 (19%) - 20 (20%) Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly description of your intervention for each construct

Evaluation of intervention and conclusion. (20 points)

0 (0%) - 15 (15%) Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately evaluate intervention and/or draw conclusions

16 (16%) - 17 (17%) Adequate evaluation and support of intervention and conclusions, but with infrequent and minor issues

18 (18%) - 18 (18%) Generally thorough, well organized, and supported evaluation of intervention and conclusions, with minimal concerns

19 (19%) - 20 (20%) Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly evaluation of intervention and conclusions

1/30/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767121_1&rubric_id=_2031348_1 3/3

  Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations Very Good Outstanding

Written Communication: Extent to which writing is professional, appropriate, clear, properly formatted, grammatically and structurally correct, synthesized, supported, and scholarly. (20 points)

0 (0%) - 15 (15%) Writing does not meet basic expectations (e.g. clarity, tone, organization, grammar, spelling, punctuation, source citation, references, title page, synthesis of source material, insufficient originality, etc.)

16 (16%) - 17 (17%) Writing adequately meets expectations  for writing and synthesis but with infrequent and minor issues

18 (18%) - 18 (18%) Writing is generally thorough and grammatically correct, with proper formatting and minimal concerns. Synthesis is demonstrated and ideas are supported without reliance on quoting

19 (19%) - 20 (20%) Writing is fully developed, exceptionally well organized, synthesized, supported, scholarly, and free of writing errors. Concepts are connected throughout paper with appropriate transitions and multiple appropriate resources and examples.

Total Points: 100

Name: PUBH6038_Module6_Assignment_Rubric

Description: Criteria: Adherence to Assignment Expectations (see course for details)