PAPER

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Very Good Outstanding

Overview of how ethics relates to global health including analysis of the ethical dimensions of research, interventions, and policies that apply to the global health environment. (10 points)

0 (0%) - 7 (7%) Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately address how ethics relates to global health including analysis of the ethical dimensions of research, interventions, and policies that apply to the global health environment

8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Adequate description and support of how ethics relates to global health including analysis of the ethical dimensions of research, interventions, and policies that apply to the global health environment but with infrequent and minor issues

9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Thorough, well organized, and supported explanation of how ethics relates to global health including analysis of the ethical dimensions of research, interventions, and policies that apply to the global health environment

10 (10%) - 10 (10%) Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of how ethics relates to global health including analysis of the ethical dimensions of research, interventions, and policies that apply to the global health environment

Analysis of assigned ethical dilemma including ethical considerations for a public health professional who is working in this situation in each of the two regions. Includes specific examples of research, data handling, interventions, and a comparison and contrast of the ethical dimensions. (30 points)

0 (0%) - 23 (23%) Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately address assigned ethical dilemma, ethical considerations for a public health professional who is working in this situation in each of the two regions, specific examples of research, data handling, interventions, and/or comparison and contrast of the ethical dimensions

24 (24%) - 26 (26%) Adequate description and support of ethical considerations for a public health professional who is working in this situation in each of the two regions, including specific examples of research, data handling, interventions, and comparison and contrast of the ethical dimensions but with infrequent and minor issues

27 (27%) - 28 (28%) Thorough, well organized, and supported explanation of ethical considerations for a public health professional who is working in this situation in each of the two regions, including specific examples of research, data handling, interventions, and comparison and contrast of the ethical dimensions

29 (29%) - 30 (30%) Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of the ethical considerations for a public health professional who is working in this situation in each of the two regions, including specific examples of research, data handling, interventions, and comparison and contrast of the ethical dimensions

Description of importance of cultural competence in assigned scenario and how to address the ethical dilemma in each of the two regions, using principles of global health ethics. Includes opportunities, challenges, and barriers a public health professional may encounter in each of the regions. (20 points)

0 (0%) - 15 (15%) Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately address importance of cultural competence in assigned scenario and/or how to address the ethical dilemma in each of the two regions, using principles of global health ethics including opportunities, challenges, and barriers a public health professional may encounter in each of the regions

16 (16%) - 17 (17%) Adequate description and support of importance of cultural competence in assigned scenario and how to address the ethical dilemma in each of the two regions, using principles of global health ethics including opportunities, challenges, and barriers a public health professional may encounter in each of the regions but with infrequent and minor issues

18 (18%) - 18 (18%) Generally thorough, well organized, and supported explanation of importance of cultural competence in assigned scenario and how to address the ethical dilemma in each of the two regions, using principles of global health ethics including opportunities, challenges, and barriers a public health professional may encounter in each of the regions with minimal concerns

19 (19%) - 20 (20%) Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of the importance of cultural competence in assigned scenario and how to address the ethical dilemma in each of the two regions, using principles of global health ethics including opportunities, challenges, and barriers a public health professional may encounter in each of the regions

Explanation of how applying the principles of global health ethics contributes to positive social change in each of the two regions with specific examples. (20 points)

0 (0%) - 15 (15%) Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately address how applying the principles of global health ethics contributes to positive social change in each of the two regions with specific examples

16 (16%) - 17 (17%) Adequate description and support of how applying the principles of global health ethics contributes to positive social change in each of the two regions with specific examples but with infrequent and minor issues

18 (18%) - 18 (18%) Generally thorough, well organized, and supported explanation of how applying the principles of global health ethics contributes to positive social change in each of the two regions with specific examples with minimal concerns

19 (19%) - 20 (20%) Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of how applying the principles of global health ethics contributes to positive social change in each of the two regions with specific examples

Written Communication: Extent to which writing is professional, appropriate, clear, properly formatted, grammatically and structurally correct, synthesized, supported, and scholarly

0 (0%) - 15 (15%) Writing does not meet basic expectations (e.g. clarity, tone, organization, grammar, spelling, punctuation, source citation, references, title page, synthesis of source material, insufficient originality, etc.).

16 (16%) - 17 (17%) Writing adequately meets expectations for writing and synthesis but with infrequent and minor issues.

18 (18%) - 18 (18%) Writing is generally thorough and grammatically correct, with proper formatting and minimal concerns. Synthesis is demonstrated and ideas are supported without reliance on quoting.

19 (19%) - 20 (20%) Writing is fully developed, exceptionally well organized, synthesized, supported, scholarly, and free of writing errors. Concepts are connected throughout paper with appropriate transitions and multiple appropriate resources and examples.

Total Points: 100

Name: PUBH6129_Week_03_Assignment_Rubric

Description: Adherence to Assignment Expectations (see course for details) EXIT

Grid View List View

Name: PUBH6129_Week_03_Assignment_Rubric

Description: Adherence to Assignment Expectations (see course for details)

EXIT