high level of analysis

2017/11/11 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://nuonline.neu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_1670685_1&course_id=undefined… 1/4

Minimal Effort Proficient Exemplary

Content/Substance 0 (0%) - 27.6 (27.6%)

Minimally acceptable effort: Key elements of the assignment are not covered in a substantive way. Inadequately adequately identifies project stakeholders. Does not adequately explain project’s requirements collection method or timetable. Logic is not persuasive to project decision makers. Analysis provides inadequate data and justification for the project.

32 (32%)

28 (28%) - 35.6 (35.6%)

In a proficient manner – Most key elements of the assignment are covered in a substantive way. Adequately identifies project stakeholders. Mostly explains project’s requirements collection method or timetable. Logically persuades decision makers. Analysis provides data and adequate justification for the project.

Feedback: You have a good narrative approach. I like how you are striving to set the scenario and define the context in which these cases are to be assessed.

36 (36%) - 40 (40%)

In an exemplary manner – All key elements of the assignment are covered in a substantive way. Effectively identifies project stakeholders. Effectively explain project’s requirements collection method or timetable. Logically persuades decision makers. Analysis effectively provides data and justification for the project.

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Name: PJM 6005 - Individual and Group Papers Exit

Grid View List View

2017/11/11 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://nuonline.neu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_1670685_1&course_id=undefined… 2/4

Minimal Effort Proficient Exemplary

Organization/Development 0 (0%) - 13.8 (13.8%)

Minimally acceptable effort: Paper’s central theme and purpose is not clear. Transitions are present, logical, and mostly maintain the flow throughout the paper. Subsequent sections mostly develop and support the central theme. Few conclusions and recommendations follow logically from the body of the paper. The tone is not appropriate to the content and assignment. Sentences are not well constructed, strong, nor varied. Words used are often in precise and ambiguous.

16 (16%)

14 (14%) - 17.8 (17.8%)

In an proficient manner – Paper’s central theme and purpose is mostly clear. Transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow throughout the paper. Subsequent sections mostly develop and support the central theme. Most conclusions and recommendations follow logically from the body of the paper. The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. Sentences are mostly well constructed, strong, and varied. Words used are precise and unambiguous.

Feedback: I am not seeing the utilization of at least 2 templates...but you do have a strong attempt at a narrative overview and discussion.

18 (18%) - 20 (20%)

In an exemplary manner – Paper’s central theme and purpose is immediately clear. Transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow throughout the paper. Subsequent sections effectively develop and support the central theme. Conclusions and recommendations follow logically from the body of the paper. The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. Sentences are well constructed, strong, and varied. Words used are precise and unambiguous.

Writing Mechanics 0 (0%) - 13.8 (13.8%)

Minimally acceptable effort: Assignment— including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page— is not consistent with effective writing formatting guidelines and

16 (16%)

14 (14%) - 17.8 (17.8%)

In an proficient manner – Assignment— including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page— is mostly

18 (18%) - 20 (20%)

In an exemplary manner – Assignment— including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page— is consistent with effective writing formatting guidelines and

2017/11/11 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://nuonline.neu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_1670685_1&course_id=undefined… 3/4

Minimal Effort Proficient Exemplary

does not meet course-level requirements. Intellectual property is not recognized with in-text citations and a reference page. Rules of English grammar, usage, and punctuation are not always followed. Many spelling mistakes.

consistent with effective writing formatting guidelines and meets course- level requirements. Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page. Rules of English grammar, usage, and punctuation are mostly followed. Spelling is mostly correct.

Feedback: I greatly admire the narrative approach that you are using, trying to build a case and setting the stage. However, anytime you are working in another language, it is very useful to get business writing support (I studied French, Spanish, German and Swedish...so I can appreciate the challenge you are facing and admire your efforts!). As such, it is challenging to follow your narrative at this point, but I would like to suggest you touchbase with the business writing center...I think they could greatly assist you with enhancing you frame your points and perspectives! :)

meets course- level requirements. Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page. Rules of English grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed. Spelling is correct.

2017/11/11 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://nuonline.neu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_1670685_1&course_id=undefined… 4/4

Minimal Effort Proficient Exemplary

Creativity/Reasoning/Style 0 (0%) - 13.8 (13.8%)

Minimally acceptable effort: Limited creativity, mostly definitional

16 (16%)

14 (14%) - 17.8 (17.8%)

In a proficient manner: Shows some insight, personal examples, creativity, some reasoning in positions

Feedback: Good approach. Need to work on the writing mechanics because we have numerous challenges following the reasoning...but I understand how you are trying to provide context!

18 (18%) - 20 (20%)

In an exemplary manner: Great creativity, strong examples, substantiated and strong reasoning

Raw Total: 80.00 (of 100.0)

Name:PJM 6005 - Individual and Group Papers Exit