Discussion: Research Design and t Tests: How Are They Connected?

Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

file:///C/Users/bryants/Pictures/Camera Roll/Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn.html[3/29/2021 10:17:23 AM]

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Excellent Good Fair Poor

Discussion Posting Content

7.2 (36%) - 8 (40%)

Discussion posting demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting provides significant detail (including multiple relevant examples), evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.

6.4 (32%) - 7.1 (35.5%)

Discussion posting demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting provides moderate detail (including at least one pertinent example), evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.

5.6 (28%) - 6.3 (31.5%)

Discussion posting demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting may be lacking or incorrect in some area, or in detail and specificity, and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

0 (0%) - 5.5 (27.5%)

Discussion posting demonstrates poor or no understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting is incorrect and/or shallow, and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

Peer Feedback and Interaction

7.2 (36%) - 8 (40%)

Response posting is excellent and fully contributes to the quality of interaction by offering substantive

6.4 (32%) - 7.1 (35.5%)

Response posting is good and partially contributes to the quality of interaction by

5.6 (28%) - 6.3 (31.5%)

Response posting is fair and partially contributes to the quality of interaction but offers insufficient

0 (0%) - 5.5 (27.5%)

Student does not interact with peers (0 points) or the response posting does not contribute to the

Name: RSCH_8210_Week6_Discussion_Rubric

Grid View List View

Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

file:///C/Users/bryants/Pictures/Camera Roll/Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn.html[3/29/2021 10:17:23 AM]

constructive critiques, suggestions, in- depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes that draw from the readings and other scholarly sources.

offering adequate constructive critiques, suggestions, in- depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes that draw from the readings and other scholarly sources.

constructive critiques or suggestions, shallow questions, or provides poor quality additional resources.

quality of interaction by offering any constructive critiques, suggestions, questions, or additional resources.

Writing 3.6 (18%) - 4 (20%) Postings are well organized, use scholarly tone, contain original writing and proper paraphrasing, follow APA Style, contain very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and are fully consistent with graduate- level writing style.

3.2 (16%) - 3.5 (17.5%)

Postings are mostly consistent with graduate- level writing style. Postings may have some small organization, scholarly tone, writing, or APA Style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors.

2.8 (14%) - 3.1 (15.5%)

Postings are somewhat below graduate-level writing style. Postings may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA Style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or show moderate reliance on quoting versus original writing and paraphrasing.

0 (0%) - 2.7 (13.5%)

ostings are well below graduate- level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA Style, and writing, or show heavy reliance on quoting.

Total Points: 20

Name: RSCH_8210_Week6_Discussion_Rubric

1. Fja2JvYXJkJTIwTGVhcm4uaHRtbAA=:
1. bottom_Exit:
2. bottom_Exit_(1):