Assignment week 7

1/13/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16781187_1&rubric_id=_2074407_1 1/5

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Using the Week 4 Part 4 section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identi�ed. Be sure to include the following:

·   The topic of interest you have selected.

·   Correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.

·   Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

18 (18%) - 20 (20%) The response clearly identi�es the topic of interest selected.

The response accurately and completely provides a citation of the article selected, including an accurate and complete link or thorough search details.

The response clearly identi�es and describes in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

16 (16%) - 17 (17%) The response partially identi�es the topic of interest selected.

The response provides a partial citation of the article selected, including a partial link or search details.

The response partially identi�es and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response vaguely identi�es the topic of interest selected.

The response vaguely or inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague or inaccurate search details.

The response vaguely or inaccurately identi�es and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

0 (0%) - 13 (13%) The response vaguely and inaccurately identi�es the topic of interest selected, or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague and inaccurate search details, or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately identi�es and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article, or is missing.

Name: NURS_6003_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

1/13/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16781187_1&rubric_id=_2074407_1 2/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

·   Write a one- paragraph justi�cation explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice.

18 (18%) - 20 (20%) The response clearly and accurately provides a detailed analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the justi�cation of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

16 (16%) - 17 (17%) The response provides a partial analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

The response partially explains the justi�cation of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response provides a vague or inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the justi�cation of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

0 (0%) - 13 (13%) The response provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template, or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justi�cation of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice, or is missing.

1/13/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16781187_1&rubric_id=_2074407_1 3/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Write a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:

·   Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer- reviewed research.

·   Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be e�ective in �nding peer- reviewed research.

·   Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to �nd peer-reviewed research.

41 (41%) - 45 (45%) The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the approach to identifying and analyzing peer- reviewed research.

The response clearly identi�es and accurately describes in detail at least two strategies used to be e�ective in �nding peer- reviewed research.

The response provides a complete, detailed, and speci�c synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to �nd peer- reviewed research. The response fully integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course speci�c resources that fully supports the summary provided.

36 (36%) - 40 (40%) The response partially describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer- reviewed research.

The response partially identi�es and describes at least two strategies used to be e�ective in �nding peer- reviewed research.

The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to �nd peer-reviewed research. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course speci�c resources that support the summary provided.

32 (32%) - 35 (35%) The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer- reviewed research.

The response vaguely or inaccurately identi�es and describes at least two strategies used to be e�ective in �nding peer- reviewed research.

The response vaguely or inaccurately synthesizes at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to �nd peer-reviewed research. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.

0 (0%) - 31 (31%) The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer- reviewed research, or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately identi�es and describes at least two strategies used to be e�ective in �nding peer- reviewed research, or is missing.

The response fails to integrate any resources that may be used in the future to �nd peer- reviewed research to support the summary provided, or is missing.

1/13/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16781187_1&rubric_id=_2074407_1 4/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, �ow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or o� topic.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1- 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

1/13/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16781187_1&rubric_id=_2074407_1 5/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1- 2) APA format errors.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6003_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

EXIT