Discussion: Treatment of Personality Disorders Week 3
Chard1
12/14/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033597_1 1/4
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Pro�cient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
44 (44%) - 44 (44%)
* Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s) *is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
40 (40%) - 43 (43%)
* Responds to the discusion question(s) *is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references
35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
* Responds to most of the discusion question(s) *is somewhat re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references
31 (31%) - 34 (34%)
* Responds to some of the discusion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are super�cially addresed *is somewhat lacking re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
0 (0%) - 30 (30%)
* Does not respond to the discusion question(s) * lacks depth or super�cially addresses criteria *lacks re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible references
Name: NRNP_6670_Week3_Discussion_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
12/14/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033597_1 2/4
OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Pro�cient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting: Writing
6 (6%) - 6 (6%) * Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)
* Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) * Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
4 (4%) - 5 (5%) *Writtten somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting erros
0 (0%) - 4 (4%) * Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
Main Posting: Timely and full participation
10 (10%) - 10 (10%)
* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date
0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) * does not meet requirement for full participation
First Reponse Post to colleague's main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.
9 (9%) - 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
8.5 (8.5%) - 8.5 (8.5%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
7.5 (7.5%) - 8 (8%)
* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
6.5 (6.5%) - 7 (7%)
* response is on topic, may have some depth
0 (0%) - 6 (6%) * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth
12/14/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033597_1 3/4
OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Pro�cient Performance
Room for Improvement
First Reponse: Writing
6 (6%) - 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English
5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English
4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%)
* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited
0 (0%) - 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited
First Reponse: Timely and full participation
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date
0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation
Second Reponse: Post to colleague's main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.
9 (9%) - 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
8.5 (8.5%) - 8.5 (8.5%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
7.5 (7.5%) - 8 (8%)
* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
6.5 (6.5%) - 7 (7%)
* response is on topic, may have some depth
0 (0%) - 6 (6%) * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth
12/14/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033597_1 4/4
OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Pro�cient Performance
Room for Improvement
Second Reponse: Writing
6 (6%) - 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English
5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English
4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%)
* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited
0 (0%) - 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited
Second Reponse: Timely and full participation
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date
0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation
Total Points: 100
Name: NRNP_6670_Week3_Discussion_Rubric
EXIT