For Pro Dismuz
PROFESSOR CALLEN
RubricDetailBlackboardLearn.htmlRubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: EDDD_8002_Module3_Application_Rubric
| Exemplary Advanced Graduate Level Work | Advanced Graduate Level Work | Minimal Advanced Graduate Level Work | Unacceptable Advanced Graduate Level Work | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adherence to Assignment Expectations | Points: 3 (12.5%) Assignment exceeds expectations, integrating additional material and/or information. (3 points) Feedback: | Points: 2 (8.33%) All parts of the assignment are completed, with fully developed topics. (2 points) Feedback: | Points: 1 (4.17%) Most parts of assignment are completed. Topics are not fully developed. (1 point) Feedback: | Points: 0 (0%) Does not fulfill the expectations of the assignment. Key components are not included. (0 points) Feedback: |
| Adherence to Assignment Expectations | Points: 3 (12.5%) Assignment demonstrates exceptional breadth and depth. (3 points) Feedback: | Points: 2 (8.33%) Assignment demonstrates appropriate breadth and depth. (2 points) Feedback: | Points: 1 (4.17%) Assignment demonstrates minimal depth and breadth. (1 point) Feedback: | Points: 0 (0%) Assignment lacks breadth and depth. (0 points) Feedback: |
| Adherence to Assignment Expectations | Points: 3 (12.5%) Assignment demonstrates exceptional understanding of course/module criteria. (3 points) Feedback: | Points: 2 (8.33%) Assignment demonstrates clear understanding of course/module criteria. (2 points) Feedback: | Points: 1 (4.17%) Assignment demonstrates little understanding of course/module criteria. (1 point) Feedback: | Points: 0 (0%) Assignment demonstrates no understanding of course/module criteria. (0 points) Feedback: |
| Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas | Points: 3 (12.5%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment’s purpose as well as the ability intellectually to explore implement key instructional concepts. (3 points) Feedback: | Points: 2 (8.33%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment’s purpose. (2 points) Feedback: | Points: 1 (4.17%) Shows some degree of understanding of the assignment’s purpose. (1 point) Feedback: | Points: 0 (0%) Shows a lack of understanding of the assignment’s purpose. (0 points) Feedback: |
| Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas | Points: 3 (12.5%) Demonstrates insightful critical thinking of key instructional concepts, theories and strategies. (3 points) Feedback: | Points: 2 (8.33%) Provides careful consideration of key instructional concepts, theories and strategies. (2 points) Feedback: | Points: 1 (4.17%) Generally applies theories, concepts, and/or strategies correctly, with ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. (1 point) Feedback: | Points: 0 (0%) Does not apply theories, concepts, and/or strategies. (0 points) Feedback: |
| Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas | Points: 3 (12.5%) Demonstrates exceptional inclusion of major points, using creditable sources, in addition to course videos or required readings. (3 points) Feedback: | Points: 2 (8.33%) Includes specific information from course videos or required readings to support major points. (2 points) Feedback: | Points: 1 (4.17%) Minimally includes specific information from course videos or required readings. (1 point) Feedback: | Points: 0 (0%) Does not include specific information from course videos or required readings. (0 points) Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting | Points: 3 (12.5%) Work represents scholarly writing in correct APA format; effective sentence variety; and clear, concise, powerful expression. The entire piece is well organized and includes an introduction and conclusion. (3 points) Feedback: | Points: 2 (8.33%) Work is well organized with mostly correct APA formatting throughout; elements of effective communication such as an introduction and conclusion are included. (2 points) Feedback: | Points: 1 (4.17%) Somewhat represents scholarly, advanced graduate-level writing, with APA generally followed; elements of effective communication such as an introduction and conclusion are not included. (1 point) Feedback: | Points: 0 (0%) The quality of writing and/or APA formatting are not acceptable for advanced graduate level work; no effort to express ideas clearly and concisely. (0 points) Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting | Points: 3 (12.5%) Work is unified around a central purpose with well-developed ideas, logically organized in paragraph structure with clear transitions and proper grammar. (3 points) Feedback: | Points: 2 (8.33%) Ideas are clearly and concisely expressed with few, if any, grammatical or mechanical errors. (2 points) Feedback: | Points: 1 (4.17%) Ideas are not clearly and concisely expressed with more than a few grammatical or mechanical errors. (1 point) Feedback: | Points: 0 (0%) Major points do not reflect appropriate elements of communication with many grammatical or mechanical errors. (0 points) Feedback: |
Adherence to Assignment Expectations--
Levels of Achievement: Exemplary Advanced Graduate Level Work 3 (12.5%) points Assignment exceeds expectations, integrating additional material and/or information. (3 points) Advanced Graduate Level Work 2 (8.33%) points All parts of the assignment are completed, with fully developed topics. (2 points) Minimal Advanced Graduate Level Work 1 (4.17%) points Most parts of assignment are completed. Topics are not fully developed. (1 point) Unacceptable Advanced Graduate Level Work 0 (0%) points Does not fulfill the expectations of the assignment. Key components are not included. (0 points) Feedback:Adherence to Assignment Expectations--
Levels of Achievement: Exemplary Advanced Graduate Level Work 3 (12.5%) points Assignment demonstrates exceptional breadth and depth. (3 points) Advanced Graduate Level Work 2 (8.33%) points Assignment demonstrates appropriate breadth and depth. (2 points) Minimal Advanced Graduate Level Work 1 (4.17%) points Assignment demonstrates minimal depth and breadth. (1 point) Unacceptable Advanced Graduate Level Work 0 (0%) points Assignment lacks breadth and depth. (0 points) Feedback:Adherence to Assignment Expectations--
Levels of Achievement: Exemplary Advanced Graduate Level Work 3 (12.5%) points Assignment demonstrates exceptional understanding of course/module criteria. (3 points) Advanced Graduate Level Work 2 (8.33%) points Assignment demonstrates clear understanding of course/module criteria. (2 points) Minimal Advanced Graduate Level Work 1 (4.17%) points Assignment demonstrates little understanding of course/module criteria. (1 point) Unacceptable Advanced Graduate Level Work 0 (0%) points Assignment demonstrates no understanding of course/module criteria. (0 points) Feedback:Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas--
Levels of Achievement: Exemplary Advanced Graduate Level Work 3 (12.5%) points Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment’s purpose as well as the ability intellectually to explore implement key instructional concepts. (3 points) Advanced Graduate Level Work 2 (8.33%) points Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment’s purpose. (2 points) Minimal Advanced Graduate Level Work 1 (4.17%) points Shows some degree of understanding of the assignment’s purpose. (1 point) Unacceptable Advanced Graduate Level Work 0 (0%) points Shows a lack of understanding of the assignment’s purpose. (0 points) Feedback:Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas--
Levels of Achievement: Exemplary Advanced Graduate Level Work 3 (12.5%) points Demonstrates insightful critical thinking of key instructional concepts, theories and strategies. (3 points) Advanced Graduate Level Work 2 (8.33%) points Provides careful consideration of key instructional concepts, theories and strategies. (2 points) Minimal Advanced Graduate Level Work 1 (4.17%) points Generally applies theories, concepts, and/or strategies correctly, with ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. (1 point) Unacceptable Advanced Graduate Level Work 0 (0%) points Does not apply theories, concepts, and/or strategies. (0 points) Feedback:Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas--
Levels of Achievement: Exemplary Advanced Graduate Level Work 3 (12.5%) points Demonstrates exceptional inclusion of major points, using creditable sources, in addition to course videos or required readings. (3 points) Advanced Graduate Level Work 2 (8.33%) points Includes specific information from course videos or required readings to support major points. (2 points) Minimal Advanced Graduate Level Work 1 (4.17%) points Minimally includes specific information from course videos or required readings. (1 point) Unacceptable Advanced Graduate Level Work 0 (0%) points Does not include specific information from course videos or required readings. (0 points) Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting--
Levels of Achievement: Exemplary Advanced Graduate Level Work 3 (12.5%) points Work represents scholarly writing in correct APA format; effective sentence variety; and clear, concise, powerful expression. The entire piece is well organized and includes an introduction and conclusion. (3 points) Advanced Graduate Level Work 2 (8.33%) points Work is well organized with mostly correct APA formatting throughout; elements of effective communication such as an introduction and conclusion are included. (2 points) Minimal Advanced Graduate Level Work 1 (4.17%) points Somewhat represents scholarly, advanced graduate-level writing, with APA generally followed; elements of effective communication such as an introduction and conclusion are not included. (1 point) Unacceptable Advanced Graduate Level Work 0 (0%) points The quality of writing and/or APA formatting are not acceptable for advanced graduate level work; no effort to express ideas clearly and concisely. (0 points) Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting--
Levels of Achievement: Exemplary Advanced Graduate Level Work 3 (12.5%) points Work is unified around a central purpose with well-developed ideas, logically organized in paragraph structure with clear transitions and proper grammar. (3 points) Advanced Graduate Level Work 2 (8.33%) points Ideas are clearly and concisely expressed with few, if any, grammatical or mechanical errors. (2 points) Minimal Advanced Graduate Level Work 1 (4.17%) points Ideas are not clearly and concisely expressed with more than a few grammatical or mechanical errors. (1 point) Unacceptable Advanced Graduate Level Work 0 (0%) points Major points do not reflect appropriate elements of communication with many grammatical or mechanical errors. (0 points) Feedback:| Total Points: 24 |
|---|
Name: EDDD_8002_Module3_Application_Rubric
