Assignment - Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health

12/6/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767090_1&rubric_id=_2031050_1 1/4

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid-

-Identify a population health concern

-Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) The response clearly and accurately identi�es and describes a population health concern.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) The response vaguely identi�es and describes a population health concern.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

The response inaccurately identi�es and describes a population health concern.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Identi�cation and description of a population health concern is missing or incomplete.

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid-

- Describe the administrative agenda focus related to this issue for the current and two previous presidents.

- Identify the allocations of �nancial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.

- Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

18 (18%) - 20 (20%) The response clearly and accurately describes the presidential administrations’ focus related to the concern, the �nancial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explains how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. At least 3 resources are used.

16 (16%) - 17 (17%) The response vaguely describes the presidential administrations’ focus related to the concern, the �nancial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explains how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Only 2 resources are used.

14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response inaccurately describes the presidential administrations’ focus related to the concern, the �nancial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Only 1 resource is used.

0 (0%) - 13 (13%) The description of the presidential administrations’ focus related to the concern, �nancial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explanation for how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue is missing. No resources are used.

Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

12/6/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767090_1&rubric_id=_2031050_1 2/4

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:

-Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?

-How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?

-Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?

23 (23%) - 25 (25%) -The response clearly and accurately identi�es an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue. -Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. - The response clearly and accurately identi�es the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.

20 (20%) - 22 (22%) -The response vaguely identi�es an administrative agency which may be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue. -Response adequately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. -Identi�cation of the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is vague.

18 (18%) - 19 (19%) -Identi�cation of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected health care issue is inaccurate. -Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate. -Identi�cation of the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.

0 (0%) - 17 (17%) -Identi�cation of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing. -Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague and inaccurate or is missing. -Identi�cation of the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is vague and inaccurate or is missing.

Narrative:

Based on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy- maker/legislator or a member of their sta� for this healthcare issue.

-Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

-Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues

32 (32%) - 35 (35%) Creates a well-developed, accurate, and narrative.

The response provides a complete, detailed, and speci�c synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course speci�c resources that fully supports the summary provided.

Responses accurately and thoroughly justify in detail the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

28 (28%) - 31 (31%) Creates an accurate and thorough narrative.

The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course speci�c resources that may support the summary provided.

Responses accurately justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

25 (25%) - 27 (27%) Creates a narrative that is partially accurate or incomplete.

The response provides a vague or inaccurate summary of outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.

The responses partially justi�es the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

0 (0%) - 24 (24%)

The response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of no outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation, or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided.

Responses justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or is missing.

12/6/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767090_1&rubric_id=_2031050_1 3/4

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, �ow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or o� topic.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1- 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1- 2) APA format errors.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

EXIT

12/6/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767090_1&rubric_id=_2031050_1 4/4