art
urjiabdi
RubricDetailAfricanArt.htmlRubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: Research paper
Type: Used for Grading
![Previous]()
1 of 2
![Next]()
| A+ | A | B | C | D | F | 0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theory/methodology | Points: 30 (30.00%) reserved for exemplary work Feedback: | Points: 28.5 (28.50%) paper shows excellent awareness of art historical methodologies and analysis, including at least one body of theory Feedback: | Points: 25.5 (25.50%) paper shows good awareness of art historical methodologies and analysis Feedback: | Points: 22.5 (22.50%) paper shows some awareness of art historical methodologies and analysis Feedback: | Points: 19.5 (19.50%) paper shows little awareness of art historical methodologies and analysis Feedback: | Points: 15 (15.00%) paper does not demonstrate awareness of art historical methodologies and analysis Feedback: | Points: 0 (0.00%) paper is plagiarized or otherwise violates academic integrity policy Feedback: |
| Articulation | Points: 30 (30.00%) reserved for exemplary work Feedback: | Points: 28.5 (28.50%) clear and original argument/thesis supported by evidence that is properly cited; paper is accurate and factually correct; grammar and language are appropriate for college-level work Feedback: | Points: 25.5 (25.50%) clear argument/thesis supported by evidence that is properly cited (may have minor errors); grammar and language are mostly appropriate Feedback: | Points: 22.5 (22.50%) thesis or evidence are lacking/weak; some errors with citation, factual errors, and/or grammar issues Feedback: | Points: 19.5 (19.50%) weak argument with little to no supporting evidence or sources are cited improperly; much factual information is incorrect ; major grammar or language issues Feedback: | Points: 15 (15.00%) no argument or supporting evidence and/or sources are cited improperly Feedback: | Points: 0 (0.00%) paper is plagiarized or otherwise violates academic integrity policy Feedback: |
| Research | Points: 30 (30.00%) reserved for exemplary work Feedback: | Points: 28.5 (28.50%) sources are appropriate, scholarly, and demonstrate expertise in research; primary sources are used where appropriate Feedback: | Points: 25.5 (25.50%) sources are academic, show depth and breadth, and help to support the argument; primary sources are included where appropriate Feedback: | Points: 22.5 (22.50%) sources are mostly appropriate for academic work and show some depth and scope of research Feedback: | Points: 19.5 (19.50%) sources are mostly unreliable or lacking in depth and breadth Feedback: | Points: 15 (15.00%) sources are lacking in number and validity Feedback: | Points: 0 (0.00%) no sources or paper violates academic integrity policy Feedback: |
| Requirements | Points: 10 (10.00%) reserved for exemplary work Feedback: | Points: 9.5 (9.50%) perfectly fulfills or exceeds all requirements and goals of the assignment, including length, use of Chicago Style, images, and bibliography Feedback: | Points: 8.5 (8.50%) fulfills requirements and goals of the assignment Feedback: | Points: 7.5 (7.50%) reasonably meets requirements and goals of the assignment Feedback: | Points: 6.5 (6.50%) meets some requirements and goals of the assignment Feedback: | Points: 5 (5.00%) does not meet most requirements or goals of the assignment Feedback: | Points: 0 (0.00%) paper violates academic integrity policy Feedback: |
Theory/methodology--
Levels of Achievement: A+ 30 (30.00%) points reserved for exemplary work A 28.5 (28.50%) points paper shows excellent awareness of art historical methodologies and analysis, including at least one body of theory B 25.5 (25.50%) points paper shows good awareness of art historical methodologies and analysis C 22.5 (22.50%) points paper shows some awareness of art historical methodologies and analysis D 19.5 (19.50%) points paper shows little awareness of art historical methodologies and analysis F 15 (15.00%) points paper does not demonstrate awareness of art historical methodologies and analysis 0 0 (0.00%) points paper is plagiarized or otherwise violates academic integrity policy Feedback:Articulation--
Levels of Achievement: A+ 30 (30.00%) points reserved for exemplary work A 28.5 (28.50%) points clear and original argument/thesis supported by evidence that is properly cited; paper is accurate and factually correct; grammar and language are appropriate for college-level work B 25.5 (25.50%) points clear argument/thesis supported by evidence that is properly cited (may have minor errors); grammar and language are mostly appropriate C 22.5 (22.50%) points thesis or evidence are lacking/weak; some errors with citation, factual errors, and/or grammar issues D 19.5 (19.50%) points weak argument with little to no supporting evidence or sources are cited improperly; much factual information is incorrect ; major grammar or language issues F 15 (15.00%) points no argument or supporting evidence and/or sources are cited improperly 0 0 (0.00%) points paper is plagiarized or otherwise violates academic integrity policy Feedback:Research--
Levels of Achievement: A+ 30 (30.00%) points reserved for exemplary work A 28.5 (28.50%) points sources are appropriate, scholarly, and demonstrate expertise in research; primary sources are used where appropriate B 25.5 (25.50%) points sources are academic, show depth and breadth, and help to support the argument; primary sources are included where appropriate C 22.5 (22.50%) points sources are mostly appropriate for academic work and show some depth and scope of research D 19.5 (19.50%) points sources are mostly unreliable or lacking in depth and breadth F 15 (15.00%) points sources are lacking in number and validity 0 0 (0.00%) points no sources or paper violates academic integrity policy Feedback:Requirements--
Levels of Achievement: A+ 10 (10.00%) points reserved for exemplary work A 9.5 (9.50%) points perfectly fulfills or exceeds all requirements and goals of the assignment, including length, use of Chicago Style, images, and bibliography B 8.5 (8.50%) points fulfills requirements and goals of the assignment C 7.5 (7.50%) points reasonably meets requirements and goals of the assignment D 6.5 (6.50%) points meets some requirements and goals of the assignment F 5 (5.00%) points does not meet most requirements or goals of the assignment 0 0 (0.00%) points paper violates academic integrity policy Feedback:Name:Research paper
Type: Used for Grading
![Previous]()
1 of 2
![Next]()
