Educational Psychology - Constructivism - Applying Constructivist Perspectives

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Exemplary Proficient Emerging Unsatisfactory

Overall Comprehension of the Concept

40 (40.00%) Analyzes video thoroughly and is able to demonstrate an overall comprehension of the concept/s.

30 (30.00%) Is able to demonstrate overall comprehension but analysis could have been more thorough.

20 (20.00%)

Alludes to the concepts but comprehension is lacking.

Feedback: You identified some appropriate activities but your response did not provide a clear understanding of the concepts.

10 (10.00%) Concepts are not correctly identified.

Supporting Evidence 40 (40.00%) Uses several examples or supporting evidence. Validates position with applicable knowledge and research.

30 (30.00%) Uses examples of supporting evidence. Validates position. More examples are needed.

20 (20.00%)

Some supporting evidence is included in the response. It is not enough to provide clear validation of knowledge of he concept.

Feedback: You need to discuss in more detail the connection between the video and the theory. Make sure to answer the question completely with sufficient supporting evidence. Need to see more relationship to constructivist principles and theorists.

10 (10.00%) Little or no relevant supporting evidence.

Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) were flawless, and the essay itself was professional, well organized, and well written (sources cited using appropriate format as needed).

20 (20.00%)

Responses in this assignment are well written and well organized demonstrating excellence in scholarly writing. Mechanics (spelling and punctuation) and grammar are excellent.

Feedback: well written

15 (15.00%) Responses in this assignment are well written and well organized scholarly material but have 1-2 different minor patterns of errors in mechanics and/or grammar.

10 (10.00%) Responses in this assignment are basic examples of scholarly material but have 3 different patterns of errors in mechanics and/or grammar.

5 (5.00%) Responses in this assignment are not clear and/or lack organization and/or have 4 or more different patterns of errors in mechanics and/or grammar.

The rubric total value of 60.00 has been overridden with a value of 70.00 out of 100.

Name: AE Rubric EDPR 600

Description: This rubric will be used to evaluate application exercises in EDPR 600 with 100 points ExitExit

Grid View List View

Feedback to Learner

This was a difficult analysis. You may want to review the terms, theories, and theorists from our readings and discussions.

Name:AE Rubric EDPR 600

Description:This rubric will be used to evaluate application exercises in EDPR 600 with 100 points ExitExit