Reflection: Climate Change

3/8/2020 Rubric Detail – 2020:1 Spring, CHEM4210:901 ...

https://blackboard.utdl.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_1984856_1&course_id=_247658_1&maxVal… 1/3

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Exceptional Very Good Good Below average

Audience/Situation 2 (5.55555%)

Clearly identi�ed. Particularly creative or relevant.

1.5 (4.16666%)

Clearly identi�ed

1 (2.77777%)

Identi�ed but hard to understand.

0.5 (1.38888%)

Not a plausible/ relevant selection

Point #1 8 (22.22222%)

Clearly identi�ed, scienti�cally valid, thoroughly supported and relevant to the audience.

7 (19.44444%)

Clearly identi�ed, scienti�cally valid, but support could be stronger, more clear or more relevant to the audience.

6 (16.66666%)

Point identi�ed and scienti�cally valid, but support includes a minor error(s) or lacks some logic.

4 (11.11111%)

Point is not valid, support is minimal, contains multiple errors, &/or writing style makes the information di�cult to understand.

Point #2 8 (22.22222%)

7 (19.44444%)

6 (16.66666%)

4 (11.11111%)

Name: Re�ection: Climate Change Exit

Grid View List View

3/8/2020 Rubric Detail – 2020:1 Spring, CHEM4210:901 ...

https://blackboard.utdl.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_1984856_1&course_id=_247658_1&maxVal… 2/3

  Exceptional Very Good Good Below average

Clearly identi�ed, scienti�cally valid, thoroughly supported and relevant to the audience.

Clearly identi�ed, scienti�cally valid, but support could be stronger, more clear or more relevant to the audience.

Point identi�ed and scienti�cally valid, but support includes a minor error(s) or lacks some logic.

Point is not valid, support is minimal, contains multiple errors, &/or writing style makes the information di�cult to understand.

Point #3 8 (22.22222%)

Clearly identi�ed, scienti�cally valid, thoroughly supported and relevant to the audience.

7 (19.44444%)

Clearly identi�ed, scienti�cally valid, but support could be stronger, more clear or more relevant to the audience.

6 (16.66666%)

Point identi�ed and scienti�cally valid, but support includes a minor error(s) or lacks some logic.

4 (11.11111%)

Point is not valid, support is minimal, contains multiple errors, &/or writing style makes the information di�cult to understand.

A likely e�ect of climate change

4 (11.11111%)

Valid and clearly explained to the audience with supporting ideas or examples.

3 (8.33333%)

Valid, but could be more thoroughly explained or supported

2 (5.55555%)

Valid e�ect but support is minimal, includes minor error(s) or lacks some logic.

1 (2.77777%)

Point is not valid, support is minimal, contains multiple errors, &/or writing style makes the information di�cult to understand.

Proposed action 3 (8.33333%)

2 (5.55555%)

0 (0.00%) NA

1 (2.77777%)

3/8/2020 Rubric Detail – 2020:1 Spring, CHEM4210:901 ...

https://blackboard.utdl.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_1984856_1&course_id=_247658_1&maxVal… 3/3

  Exceptional Very Good Good Below average

Thoughtful, realistic and relevant to the audience.

The connection to climate change &/or to the audience, is not entirely clear.

Unrealistic or di�cult to understand.

References 3 (8.33333%)

Included at all necessary points

2 (5.55555%)

One or two points that should have had references did not.

0 (0.00%) NA

1 (2.77777%)

Multiple omissions

Name:Re�ection: Climate Change Exit