A 3-4 pages paper for art analysis.

11/1/2017 Rubric Detail – 2017FA-ARTS-1301-51003

https://dcccd.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_3699979_1&course_id=_160… 1/2

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Novice Competent Proficient

Addresses Topic 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Paper is irrelevant, off-topic, or duplicates another student's work.

1 (1%) - 9 (9%) Paper focuses on a culture that is similar or close to the correct one for the chosen artwork.

10 (10%) - 10 (10%) Paper addresses the culture of the artwork the student analyzed at the museum.

Context 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) Little to no discussion of the historical or cultural context of the work.

5 (5%) - 17 (17%) Some discussion of historical and/or cultural context, but could be more thorough.

18 (18%) - 20 (20%) Thoughtful and relevant discussion of the historic and cultural context of the work, style, or artist.

Theme 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) Little to no discussion of the theme, meaning, or content of the work.

5 (5%) - 17 (17%) The theme or meaning of the work is discussed, but not in depth.

18 (18%) - 20 (20%) The theme, content, and/or meaning of the work are fully explored and clearly explained.

Form 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) The materials and method of creation of the object are discussed little or not at all.

3 (3%) - 7 (7%) The materials and method of creation of the object are discussed, but would benefit from more detail or explanation.

8 (8%) - 10 (10%) The materials and method of creation of the object are discussed in accurate detail.

Name: Research Paper

Description: *Note: papers that contain plagiarism or academic dishonesty will lose between 50-100 points from this total, regardless of other point values earned. See syllabus for details.

Exit

Grid View List View

11/1/2017 Rubric Detail – 2017FA-ARTS-1301-51003

https://dcccd.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_3699979_1&course_id=_160… 2/2

Novice Competent Proficient

Sources and Citation

0 (0%) - 4 (4%) Little to no citation; does not represent a good faith effort to attribute the sources of all information. May rely on non- academic or otherwise inappropriate sources. Student has not followed the academic honesty standards of the course or the college.

5 (5%) - 17 (17%) Sources are mostly cited, but there may be some problems with format of citations, Works Cited page, or missing attribution. Overall the paper shows a good faith effort to attribute sources, but may fail to do so effectively. Some sources used may not be of a high academic quality.

18 (18%) - 20 (20%) All information is cited in-text, as well as on a correctly formatted Works Cited page. Sources used are reliable and appropriate for a college-level research paper. Student has effectively avoided academic dishonesty.

MLA Format 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not use MLA format.

1 (1%) - 9 (9%) Paper uses some aspects of MLA format, but may have issues with one or more of: headings, page headers, font, spacing, or citation.

10 (10%) - 10 (10%) Paper uses MLA format for all aspects of layout and citation.

Grammar 0 (0%) - 1 (1%) Poor attention to grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Needs extensive editing. Student should visit the Learning Center before proceeding with the rest of this project.

2 (2%) - 7 (7%) Some mistakes in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. Would benefit from some revision.

8 (8%) - 10 (10%) Excellent grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Paper is well-written at a college level and shows evidence of revision and proofreading.

Name:Research Paper

Description:*Note: papers that contain plagiarism or academic dishonesty will lose between 50-100 points from this total, regardless of other point values earned. See syllabus for details.

Exit