case 1

10/3/19, 2)46 PMRubric Detail – 2019)4 Fall, BUAD4020)001 Senior ...

Page 1 of 3https://blackboard.utdl.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mo…ewOnly=true&displayGrades=false&type=grading&rubricAssoId=_56586_1

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Name: Rubric for Case Analysis

Description: This rubric is intended for the Case Analysis grading. Exit

Grid View List View

Analysis guidelines not followed at all.

No evidence of following the analysis guidelines.

Student followed the analysis guidelines to some extent.

Student followed precisely the analysis guidelines.

Formatting --

Novice 14 (14.00%) points

Competent 17 (17.00%) points

Proficient 18 (18.00%) points

Expert 20 (20.00%) points

Analysis poorly structured. No evidence of logical steps for a clear and proper analysis.

The analysis is not properly organized. Clearly evidence of "last minute" writing. The work does not have structure.

The analysis is somewhat disorganized. Problems and solutions are not arranged clearly.

The analysis is properly arranged and well structured. Student clearly defined the problems

Organization --

Novice 14 (14.00%) points

Competent 17 (17.00%) points

Proficient 18 (18.00%) points

Expert 20 (20.00%) points

10/3/19, 2)46 PMRubric Detail – 2019)4 Fall, BUAD4020)001 Senior ...

Page 2 of 3https://blackboard.utdl.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?m…ewOnly=true&displayGrades=false&type=grading&rubricAssoId=_56586_1

and proposed solutions.

Flow of ideas virtually nonexistent. Contradictory ideas and case analysis not clear. Ideas used without objectives.

Analysis poorly addressed. Ideas are independent and not properly integrated for a good flow of ideas.

The analysis is somewhat difficult to follow. Contradictory ideas and/or the flow of ideas is challenging.

The analysis is very clear and student addressed it on a very structured way. There is a proper flow of ideas.

Clarity --

Novice 14 (14.00%) points

Competent 17 (17.00%) points

Proficient 18 (18.00%) points

Expert 20 (20.00%) points

Student did not meet the lower page requirement.

Student barely surpassed the lower limit of the page requirement.

Student barely met the upper limit of the page requirement.

Student met the page limit requirement and/or went beyond.

Length --

Novice 10.5 (10.50%) points

Competent 12.75 (12.75%) points

Proficient 13.5 (13.50%) points

Expert 15 (15.00%) points

Poor analysis. Student needs to improve a lot. Concepts are not well understood and/or mistakenly applied.

Fair analysis. Needs improvement. Concepts are not properly used.

Student answered the questions properly. Showed good understanding of concepts.

Quality of Analysis --

Novice 17.5 (17.50%) points

Competent 21.25 (21.25%) points

Proficient 22.5 (22.50%) points

Expert 25 (25.00%) points

10/3/19, 2)46 PMRubric Detail – 2019)4 Fall, BUAD4020)001 Senior ...

Page 3 of 3https://blackboard.utdl.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?m…ewOnly=true&displayGrades=false&type=grading&rubricAssoId=_56586_1

Deep analysis. Student went beyond the requirements.

Expert 25 (25.00%) points

Name:Rubric for Case Analysis

Description:This rubric is intended for the Case Analysis grading. Exit