Research Paper - Data Science & Big Data Analytics

profileSinners0043
RubricDetail.pdf

5/25/2020 Rubric Detail – 31228.202030

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_843783_1&course_i… 1/4

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Name: ITS836 (8 Week) Research Paper Rubric

Description: Please use this rubric for grading research papers Exit

Grid View List View

No requirements are met

Includes a few of the required components as speci�ed in the assignment.

Includes some of the required components as speci�ed in the assignment.

Includes most of the required components as speci�ed in the assignment.

Includes all of the required components as speci�ed in the assignment.

Requirements --

No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points

Limited Evidence 3 (3.00%) points

Below Expectations 7 (7.00%) points

Approaches Expectations 11 (11.00%) points

Meets Expectations 15 (15.00%) points

Fails to provide enough content to show a demonstration of knowledge

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

Some signi�cant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

A few errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

Content --

No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points

Limited Evidence 3 (3.00%) points

Below Expectations 7 (7.00%) points

Approaches Expectations 11 (11.00%) points

Meets Expectations 15 (15.00%) points

5/25/2020 Rubric Detail – 31228.202030

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_843783_1&course_i… 2/4

g

Fails to provide a critical thinking analysis and interpretation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

Some signi�cant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

A few errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

Critical Analysis --

No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points

Limited Evidence 5 (5.00%) points

Below Expectations 10 (10.00%) points

Approaches Expectations 15 (15.00%) points

Meets Expectations 20 (20.00%) points

Fails to demonstrate problem solving.

Major errors or omissions in problem solving.

Some signi�cant but not major errors or omissions in problem solving.

A few errors or omissions in problem solving.

Demonstrates strong or adequate thought and insight in problem solving.

Problem Solving --

No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points

Limited Evidence 5 (5.00%) points

Below Expectations 10 (10.00%) points

Approaches Expectations 15 (15.00%) points

Meets Expectations 20 (20.00%) points

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly de�cient.

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Sources/Examples --

No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points

Limited Evidence 2 (2.00%) points

Below Expectations 4 (4.00%) points

Approaches Expectations 7 (7.00%) points

5/25/2020 Rubric Detail – 31228.202030

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_843783_1&course_i… 3/4

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Meets Expectations 10 (10.00%) points

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor-quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

Project is adequately organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; signi�cant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; signi�cant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

Demonstrates strong or adequate thought and insight in problem solving.

Organization, Grammar, Style --

No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points

Limited Evidence 2 (2.00%) points

Below Expectations 4 (4.00%) points

Approaches Expectations 7 (7.00%) points

Meets Expectations 10 (10.00%) points

Numerous errors in APA formatting, with more than eight signi�cant errors.

Numerous errors in APA formatting, with more than �ve signi�cant errors.

Signi�cant errors in APA formatting, with four to �ve signi�cant errors.

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Proper use of APA formatting --

No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points

Limited Evidence 2 (2.00%) points

Below Expectations 4 (4.00%) points

Approaches Expectations 7 (7.00%) points

Meets Expectations 10 (10.00%) points

Name:ITS836 (8 Week) Research Paper Rubric

Description:Please use this rubric for grading research papers Exit

5/25/2020 Rubric Detail – 31228.202030

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_843783_1&course_i… 4/4