Scenario

3/29/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_635410_1&course_id=_108021_1… 1/4

Rubric DetailRubric Detail  A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Successful Adequate Developing Need 

Introduction to the company and incident

0.5 (5.00%) Provided a thorough brief overview of the organization and the incident; all fully supported by academic or reputable industry sources.

0.375 (3.75%) Somewhat provided a brief overview of the organization and the incident; somewhat supported by academic or reputable industry sources but need more development

0.25 (2.50%) Somewhat provided a brief overview of the organization and the incident; minimally supported by academic or reputable industry sources and is primarily opinion statements.

0.12 Provid overv organ incide suppo acade reputa source expre unsub opinio

Topic Development: Social/Environmental responsibilities and response actions

1.5 (15.00%) Thoroughly discussed the organization’s social/environmental responsibilities and its response actions; all fully supported by academic or reputable industry sources.

1.125 (11.25%) Somewhat discussed the organization’s social/environmental responsibilities and its response actions; somewhat supported by academic or reputable industry sources, but need more development.

0.75 (7.50%) Somewhat discussed the organization’s social/environmental responsibilities and its response actions; minimally supported by academic or reputable industry sources and is primarily opinion statements.

0.37 Provid discus organ social respo its res but no acade reputa source expre unsub opinio

Topic Development: Corporate culture and/or other internal or external factors

1.5 (15.00%) Thoroughly discussed the organization’s corporate culture

1.125 (11.25%) Somewhat discussed the organization’s corporate culture

0.75 (7.50%) Somewhat discussed the organization’s corporate culture

0.37 Provid discus organ corpo

Name: Scenario Paper Rubric

Description: Scenario papers are graded using the following rubrics. ExitExit

Grid View List View

3/29/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_635410_1&course_id=_108021_1… 2/4

  Successful Adequate Developing Need 

p and/or other factors internal or external that may have contributed to the incident; all fully supported by academic or reputable industry sources.

p and/or other factors internal or external that may have contributed to the incident; somewhat supported by academic or reputable industry sources, but need more development.

p and/or other factors internal or external that may have contributed to the incident; minimally supported by academic or reputable industry sources and is primarily opinion statements.

p and/o intern that m contri incide suppo acade reputa source expre unsub opinio

Topic Development: Identified plan(s) elements, components to include in identified document

2.5 (25.00%) Correctly identified the underdeveloped or non­developed response plan(s). Comprehensively proposed recommendations for viable components to include in the identified plan(s) that could have minimized the impact of the disaster or incident. Recommendations are fully supported by insight from course textbook and academic/reputable industry sources.

1.875 (18.75%) Correctly identified the underdeveloped or non­developed response plan(s). Comprehensively proposed recommendations for viable components to include in the identified plan(s) that could have minimized the impact of the disaster or incident. Recommendations are fully supported by insight from course textbook OR academic/reputable industry sources; but not both.

1.25 (12.50%) Incorrectly identified the underdeveloped or non­developed response plan(s), However, comprehensively proposed recommendations for viable components to include in the identified plan(s) that could have minimized the impact of the disaster or incident. Recommendations are fully supported by insight from course textbook and academic/reputable industry sources.

0.62 Incorr the un or non respo Howe comp propo recom for via compo includ identif that co minim impac disast Recom are su insigh textbo acade indust but no

Topic Development: Summary as to why recommendations would have worked

1.5 (15.00%) Thoroughly explained why the recommendations might have worked; all fully supported by academic or reputable industry sources.

1.125 (11.25%) Somewhat explained why the recommendations might have worked; somewhat supported by academic or reputable industry sources, but need more development.

0.75 (7.50%) Somewhat explained why the recommendations might have worked; minimally supported by academic or reputable industry sources and is primarily opinion statements.

0.37 Provid explan recom might  but no acade reputa source expre unsub opinio

Writing Mechanics 0.75 (7.50%) Strictly adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics; uses

0.5625 (5.625%) Excellently adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics;

0.375 (3.75%) Satisfactorily adhered to the standard usage rules of written

0.18 Minim to the usage written

3/29/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_635410_1&course_id=_108021_1… 3/4

  Successful Adequate Developing Need 

; paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run­on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used. Zero to two errors noted.

; uses paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run­on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used. Three to six errors noted.

mechanics ; uses paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run­on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. Some contractions or jargon used. Seven to 10 errors noted.

and u parag sente than b Writte includ limited capita punct sente or ext stylist and g errors or jarg More  found incom

APA Style (6th ed.) 0.75 (7.50%) Appropriately cited reference materials; authors last name, initials, publication year, source title, publication name, issue, volume, and weblink. Reference listed in alphabetical. In­text citations include the authors last name, publication year, and page number if using a direct language from the source. 1 ­ 2 APA style or usage errors.

0.5625 (5.625%) Attempted in­text citations and reference list but 3 ­ 4 APA style errors existed OR failed to use APA citations when appropriate 1 ­ 2 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference.

0.375 (3.75%) Attempted in­text citations and reference list but 5 ­ 6 APA style errors existed OR failed to use APA citations when appropriate 3 – 4 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference.

0.18 Attem citatio refere 8 APA existe use A when  ­ 6 tim throug mean expre the st origina but inf from a refere

Attention to Instructions

1 (10.00%) Scenario paper contained all 5 major assignment requirements: 1)

0.75 (7.50%) Scenario paper omitted one major assignment requirements.

0.5 (5.00%) Scenario paper omitted two major assignment requirements.

0.25 Scena omitte assign requir

3/29/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_635410_1&course_id=_108021_1… 4/4

  Successful Adequate Developing Need 

q ) Title page; 2) At least 2­pages in length (not including title and reference pages; 3) At least 6 scholarly references no older than 2005; 4) Addresses all the scenario topics in the order written; and 5) final product is written in a clear and concise manner, while adhering to all other assignment requirements and instruction guidelines.

q q q

Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) Plagiarized: There is a zero­tolerance policy for academic dishonesty and plagiarism. Per the course syllabus, any student who engages in academic dishonesty and plagiarism will receive a zero for all corresponding sections for the assignment. As an example, if you plagiarize Scenario Submission 1, you will receive a zero for both Scenario Submission 1 and Scenario Response 1 assignments.

0 (0.00%) Late: Per the course syllabus, no late assignments are accepted without prior approval.

0 (0.00%) Off­topic: Submission was completely off­topic.

0 (0.0

Name:Scenario Paper Rubric

Description:Scenario papers are graded using the following rubrics. ExitExit