Qualitative Data Analysis Assignment

RubricDetail.html

Home >Business & Finance homework help >Management homework help >Qualitative Data Analysis Assignment

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: Qualitative Data Analysis Assignment Grading Rubric

	Advanced	Proficient	Developing	Not present
QDA Elements and Length	Points: Points Range: 24 (16%) - 25 (16.67%) The submission is between 8-15 pages of content. The submission includes content addressing the following clearly identified sections: Introduction, Procedures, Anticipated Ethical Issues, and Emergent Theme Analysis. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 22 (14.67%) - 23 (15.33%) The submission does not fall within the parameters of the required length. The submission includes content addressing the following sections: Introduction, Procedures, Anticipated Ethical Issues, and Emergent Theme Analysis. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 1 (.67%) - 21 (14%) The submission does not fall within the parameters of the required length. The submission does not include content addressing the following sections: Introduction, Procedures, Anticipated Ethical Issues, and Emergent Theme Analysis. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Not Present Feedback:
Introduction, Procedures, & Anticipated Ethical Issues	Points: Points Range: 38 (25.33%) - 40 (26.67%) Content provided for each component is appropriate for qualitative research, aligns with the selected design, and is well-supported. The proposed approach for handling ethical issues is supported by scripture. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 35 (23.33%) - 37 (24.67%) Content provided for each component is appropriate for qualitative research but is not fully aligned with the design and needs further support. The proposed approach for handling ethical issues is presented, but may not be well-supported by scripture. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 1 (.67%) - 34 (22.67%) Content provided for each component is not appropriate for qualitative research, fails to align with the selected design, lacking support. The approach for handling ethical issues is not addressed. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Not Present Feedback:
Emergent Theme Analysis & Discussion	Points: Points Range: 38 (25.33%) - 40 (26.67%) The theme analysis and discussion includes identification, description/meaning, and evidence of each emergent theme for each data set. The collective themes are presented and supported with evidence and are compared/contrasted with the content from the literature review. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 35 (23.33%) - 37 (24.67%) Parts of the following sections are incomplete or lacking support: The theme analysis and discussion includes identification, description/meaning, and evidence of each emergent theme for each data set. The collective themes are presented and supported with evidence and are compared/contrasted with the content from the literature review. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 1 (.67%) - 34 (22.67%) The theme analysis and discussion does not include identification, description/meaning, and evidence of each emergent theme for each data set. The collective themes are not presented and supported with evidence and are not compared/contrasted with the content from the literature review. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Not Present Feedback:
Format	Points: Points Range: 42 (28%) - 45 (30%) The paper adheres to current APA format without errors including a title page, abstract, citations (parenthetical or in-text), reference page, and use of current APA headings. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 39 (26%) - 41 (27.33%) 1 or more of the below criteria are not met: The paper adheres to current APA format without errors including a title page, abstract, citations (parenthetical or in-text), reference page, and use of current APA headings. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 1 (.67%) - 38 (25.33%) 2 or more of the below criteria are not met: The paper adheres to current APA format without errors including a title page, abstract, citations (parenthetical or in-text), reference page, and use of current APA headings. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Not Present Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

QDA Elements and Length--

Levels of Achievement: Advanced 24 (16%) - 25 (16.67%) The submission is between 8-15 pages of content. The submission includes content addressing the following clearly identified sections: Introduction, Procedures, Anticipated Ethical Issues, and Emergent Theme Analysis. Proficient 22 (14.67%) - 23 (15.33%) The submission does not fall within the parameters of the required length. The submission includes content addressing the following sections: Introduction, Procedures, Anticipated Ethical Issues, and Emergent Theme Analysis. Developing 1 (.67%) - 21 (14%) The submission does not fall within the parameters of the required length. The submission does not include content addressing the following sections: Introduction, Procedures, Anticipated Ethical Issues, and Emergent Theme Analysis. Not present 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Not Present Feedback:

Introduction, Procedures, & Anticipated Ethical Issues--

Levels of Achievement: Advanced 38 (25.33%) - 40 (26.67%) Content provided for each component is appropriate for qualitative research, aligns with the selected design, and is well-supported. The proposed approach for handling ethical issues is supported by scripture. Proficient 35 (23.33%) - 37 (24.67%) Content provided for each component is appropriate for qualitative research but is not fully aligned with the design and needs further support. The proposed approach for handling ethical issues is presented, but may not be well-supported by scripture. Developing 1 (.67%) - 34 (22.67%) Content provided for each component is not appropriate for qualitative research, fails to align with the selected design, lacking support. The approach for handling ethical issues is not addressed. Not present 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Not Present Feedback:

Emergent Theme Analysis & Discussion--

Levels of Achievement: Advanced 38 (25.33%) - 40 (26.67%) The theme analysis and discussion includes identification, description/meaning, and evidence of each emergent theme for each data set. The collective themes are presented and supported with evidence and are compared/contrasted with the content from the literature review. Proficient 35 (23.33%) - 37 (24.67%) Parts of the following sections are incomplete or lacking support: The theme analysis and discussion includes identification, description/meaning, and evidence of each emergent theme for each data set. The collective themes are presented and supported with evidence and are compared/contrasted with the content from the literature review. Developing 1 (.67%) - 34 (22.67%) The theme analysis and discussion does not include identification, description/meaning, and evidence of each emergent theme for each data set. The collective themes are not presented and supported with evidence and are not compared/contrasted with the content from the literature review. Not present 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Not Present Feedback:

Format--

Levels of Achievement: Advanced 42 (28%) - 45 (30%) The paper adheres to current APA format without errors including a title page, abstract, citations (parenthetical or in-text), reference page, and use of current APA headings. Proficient 39 (26%) - 41 (27.33%) 1 or more of the below criteria are not met: The paper adheres to current APA format without errors including a title page, abstract, citations (parenthetical or in-text), reference page, and use of current APA headings. Developing 1 (.67%) - 38 (25.33%) 2 or more of the below criteria are not met: The paper adheres to current APA format without errors including a title page, abstract, citations (parenthetical or in-text), reference page, and use of current APA headings. Not present 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Not Present Feedback: