Name some examples of project goals that are not necessarily profitable or not related to implementing a product or a service.

10/29/21, 7:28 PM Rubric Detail – Fall 2021 - Executing the Project (BADM-...

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_11178462_1&course… 1/4

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Does Not Meet Expectations

Needs Improvement

Pro�cient Excellent

Content Knowledge & Structure

0.4 (4.00%) Fails to apply course materials and outside research and misses a majority of the relevant concepts, theories, or issues, and may address irrelevant or misguided knowledge.

0.8 (8.00%) Addresses some of the relevant concepts, theories and issues and may inconsistently apply or not fully cover content knowledge.

1.5 (15.00%) O�ers some logical ordering and understanding of course materials and outside research in response and addresses most of the relevant concepts, theories and issues.

1.6 (16.00%

Applies cours materials and outside research with logical order ideas with no gaps in information completely addressing concepts, theories and material issues.

Critical Thinking

0.2 (2.00%) F il t

0.7 (7.00%) Di f

1.3 (13.00%) O�

1.4 (14.00%

Name: Re�ection Updated -Rubric Exit

Grid View List View

10/29/21, 7:28 PM Rubric Detail – Fall 2021 - Executing the Project (BADM-...

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_11178462_1&course… 2/4

  Does Not Meet Expectations

Needs Improvement

Pro�cient Excellent

g Fails to provide su�cient critical thinking and analysis, or merely states response without explanation.

Discusses few topics critically or with full analysis, omitting relevant nuance or context.

O�ers some critical thinking and interpretation of the materials, but may miss nuance or context.

Demonstrate substantial critical thinki about topics and solid interpretatio of materials and re�ectio

Clarity & E�ective Communication

0.2 (2.00%) Fails to o�er evidence or understanding without any logical structure.

0.7 (7.00%) Provides issues without evidence or understanding, or without any logical structure.

1.3 (13.00%) Discusses some evidence and understanding, and may lack logical structure.

1.4 (14.00%

Presents material and understandin with logical and well- supported evidence and understandin

Integration of Knowledge & Articles

0.2 (2.00%) Fails to integrate or apply knowledge into overall presentation, or may plagiarize in response.

0.7 (7.00%) Lacks or provides inconsistent knowledge or concepts into thesis or response, and may provide rote recitation.

1.3 (13.00%) Applies good application of themes and concepts into thesis and responses.

1.4 (14.00%

Fully integrat and incorporates various themes and concepts into overall thesis and presentation

Presentation 0.2 (2.00%) F il t

0.7 (7.00%) L k ith

1.3 (13.00%) O i

1.4 (14.00%

10/29/21, 7:28 PM Rubric Detail – Fall 2021 - Executing the Project (BADM-...

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_11178462_1&course… 3/4

  Does Not Meet Expectations

Needs Improvement

Pro�cient Excellent

Fails to organize response coherently with multiple paragraphs, and may include run-on sentences or general lack of organization.

Lacks either section headings or topic sentences, and may include run-on sentences and/or paragraphs.

Organizes responses with some section headings and multiple paragraphs to explain concepts.

Presents responses w strong topic sentences an section headings.

Writing Mechanics

0.2 (2.00%) Writes with multiple spelling or grammatical errors and/or does not properly cite sources.

0.7 (7.00%) Writes to be understandable with some spelling or grammatical errors with some proper citations, which may include some errors.

1.3 (13.00%)

Writes clearly to be easily understood with minimal spelling or grammatical errors and properly cites sources.

1.4 (14.00%) Writes clearly and concisely to be easily understood with few, if any, spelling or grammatical error and properly cites sources thorough

Response to Other Students

0.2 (2.00%) Fails to provide substantive and meaningful discussion of the content of the other student’s paper

0.7 (7.00%) Lacks or provides little substantive and meaningful discussion of the content of the other student’s paper

1.3 (13.00%) O�ers some substantive and meaningful discussion of the content of the other student’s paper

1.4 (14.00%

Provide substantive and meaningful discussion of the content o the other student’s paper

Raw Total: 9.90 (of 10)

Feedback to Learner

Outside research presented. The textbook should have been cited and referenced.

Name:Re�ection Updated -Rubric Exit

10/29/21, 7:28 PM Rubric Detail – Fall 2021 - Executing the Project (BADM-...

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_11178462_1&course… 4/4