path week 6

profilekeke775a
RubricDetail.docx

Rubric Detail 

 

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Top of Form

Name: comprehensive case study signature assignment rubric

Description: comprehensive case study signature assignment rubric

· Grid View

· List View

 

Proficient

Satisfactory

Approaching Expectations

Not Meeting Expectations

Content / Information Discussion Question 1 CLO 2, 3

Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%)

Provides 4 or more clinical findings, treatment, and recommendations of chronic bronchitis. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient.

Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%)

Provides 3-4 clinical findings, treatment, and recommendations of chronic bronchitis from the first column. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient.

Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%)

Provides 1-2 clinical findings, treatment, and recommendations of chronic bronchitis from the first column. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary and explanations are insufficient.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%)

Does not or incorrectly answers with insufficient explanations for those answers. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.

Content / Information Discussion Question 2 CLO 1, 2

Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%)

Identifies type of heart failure and explains the pathogenesis. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient.

Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%)

Identifies type of heart failure and explains the pathogenesis. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient.

Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%)

Identifies type of heart failure and explains the pathogenesis.Information is insufficient.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%)

Does not or incorrectly answers with insufficient explanations for those answers. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.

Content / Information Discussion Question 3 CLO 1, 2, 5

Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%)

Provides thorough explanations for stage of hypertension, current medications and the impact of the disease in the U.S. population. Information is scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient.

Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%)

Provides sufficient explanations for stage of hypertension, current medications and the impact of the disease in the U.S. population. Information is scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient.

Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%)

Provides insufficient explanations. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. Does not address one of the questions.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%)

Does not or incorrectly answer with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.

Content / Information Discussion Question 4 CLO 4

Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%)

Provides thorough explanations of lipid panel, the correlation of hypertension and Type II diabetes mellitus and other medications that should be given. Information is scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient.

Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%)

Provides sufficient explanations of lipid panel, the correlation of hypertension and Type II diabetes mellitus and other medications that should be given. Information is scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient.

Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%)

Provides insufficient explanations of rationale. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. Does not address one of the questions.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%)

Does not or incorrect answers with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.

Content / Information Discussion Question 5 CLO 6

Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%)

Provides thorough explanations for lab value along with the rationale in relation to normal/abnormal body function. Information is scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient.

Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%)

Provides sufficient explanations for lab value along with the rationale in relation to normal/abnormal body function. Information is scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient.

Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%)

Provides insufficient explanations of HbA1c. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%)

Does not or incorrect answers with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.

Writing/ Organization/ Mechanics

Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%)

Answers are well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated.Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.

Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%)

Answers are well written throughout and the information is reasonably organized and communicated.Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.

Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%)

Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Assignment contains some spelling and grammatical errors.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%)

Answers are not well written and the information is poorly organized and lacks clarity. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.

Format/Layout

Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%)

Follows all requirements related to format, length and layout.

Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%)

Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format and layout.

Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%)

Follows most of the requirements related to format, length and layout.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%)

Does not follow format, length and layout requirements.

References

Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%)

All references are appropriate. There is a minimum of 3 scholarly resources with at least 1 non-internet source. All references are correctly cited and listed.

Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%)

References used are mostly appropriate. There is a minimum of 3 scholarly resources with at least 1 non-internet source. All references are correctly cited and listed.

Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%)

References used are mostly appropriate. There is a minimum of 3 scholarly resources but is missing a non-internet source. All references are mostly correctly cited and listed.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%)

References used are mostly appropriate. Only have 2 scholarly resources. References are incorrectly cited or listed.

Name:comprehensive case study signature assignment rubric

Description:comprehensive case study signature assignment rubric

Bottom of Form