path week 6
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Top of Form
Name: comprehensive case study signature assignment rubric
Description: comprehensive case study signature assignment rubric
|
|
Proficient |
Satisfactory |
Approaching Expectations |
Not Meeting Expectations |
|
Content / Information Discussion Question 1 CLO 2, 3 |
Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%) Provides 4 or more clinical findings, treatment, and recommendations of chronic bronchitis. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient. |
Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%) Provides 3-4 clinical findings, treatment, and recommendations of chronic bronchitis from the first column. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient. |
Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%) Provides 1-2 clinical findings, treatment, and recommendations of chronic bronchitis from the first column. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary and explanations are insufficient. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%) Does not or incorrectly answers with insufficient explanations for those answers. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient. |
|
Content / Information Discussion Question 2 CLO 1, 2 |
Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%) Identifies type of heart failure and explains the pathogenesis. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient. |
Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%) Identifies type of heart failure and explains the pathogenesis. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient. |
Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%) Identifies type of heart failure and explains the pathogenesis.Information is insufficient. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%) Does not or incorrectly answers with insufficient explanations for those answers. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient. |
|
Content / Information Discussion Question 3 CLO 1, 2, 5 |
Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%) Provides thorough explanations for stage of hypertension, current medications and the impact of the disease in the U.S. population. Information is scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. |
Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%) Provides sufficient explanations for stage of hypertension, current medications and the impact of the disease in the U.S. population. Information is scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. |
Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%) Provides insufficient explanations. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. Does not address one of the questions. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%) Does not or incorrectly answer with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient. |
|
Content / Information Discussion Question 4 CLO 4 |
Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%) Provides thorough explanations of lipid panel, the correlation of hypertension and Type II diabetes mellitus and other medications that should be given. Information is scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. |
Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%) Provides sufficient explanations of lipid panel, the correlation of hypertension and Type II diabetes mellitus and other medications that should be given. Information is scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. |
Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%) Provides insufficient explanations of rationale. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. Does not address one of the questions. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%) Does not or incorrect answers with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient. |
|
Content / Information Discussion Question 5 CLO 6 |
Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%) Provides thorough explanations for lab value along with the rationale in relation to normal/abnormal body function. Information is scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. |
Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%) Provides sufficient explanations for lab value along with the rationale in relation to normal/abnormal body function. Information is scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. |
Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%) Provides insufficient explanations of HbA1c. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%) Does not or incorrect answers with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient. |
|
Writing/ Organization/ Mechanics |
Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%) Answers are well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated.Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors. |
Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%) Answers are well written throughout and the information is reasonably organized and communicated.Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors. |
Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%) Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Assignment contains some spelling and grammatical errors. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%) Answers are not well written and the information is poorly organized and lacks clarity. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors. |
|
Format/Layout |
Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%) Follows all requirements related to format, length and layout. |
Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%) Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format and layout. |
Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%) Follows most of the requirements related to format, length and layout. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%) Does not follow format, length and layout requirements. |
|
References |
Points Range:32.625 (10.875%) - 37.5 (12.50%) All references are appropriate. There is a minimum of 3 scholarly resources with at least 1 non-internet source. All references are correctly cited and listed. |
Points Range:27.375 (9.125%) - 32.25 (10.75%) References used are mostly appropriate. There is a minimum of 3 scholarly resources with at least 1 non-internet source. All references are correctly cited and listed. |
Points Range:22.5 (7.50%) - 27 (9.00%) References used are mostly appropriate. There is a minimum of 3 scholarly resources but is missing a non-internet source. All references are mostly correctly cited and listed. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 22.125 (7.375%) References used are mostly appropriate. Only have 2 scholarly resources. References are incorrectly cited or listed. |
Name:comprehensive case study signature assignment rubric
Description:comprehensive case study signature assignment rubric
Bottom of Form