Assignment 2: Clinical Skills Self-Assessment
yemisij
RubricDetail-ASSG2.htmlRubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: PRAC_6645_Week1_Assignment2_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate yourself according to your confidence level performing the skills identified on the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form. | Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response provides ratings for all skills on the form. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response provides ratings for most of the skills on the form. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response provides ratings for some of the skills on the form. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response provides ratings for only a few skills on the form, or ratings are missing. Feedback: |
| Based on your ratings, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement. | Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides an accurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides a somewhat vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of the strengths and/or opportunities for improvement, or the summaries are missing. Feedback: |
| Based on your self-assessment and theory of nursing practice, develop three to four (3–4) measurable goals and objectives for this Practicum experience. Include them on the designated area of the form. | Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides three to four (3–4) clear, appropriate, and measurable goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides three to four (3–4) appropriate, measurable goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides three to four (3–4) unclear or inappropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides three to four (3–4) unclear or inappropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience, or goals and objectives are missing. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling, nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided, which delineates all required criteria. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting—APA Format: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and Reference List. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥5) APA format errors. Feedback: |
Rate yourself according to your confidence level performing the skills identified on the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response provides ratings for all skills on the form. Good 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response provides ratings for most of the skills on the form. Fair 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response provides ratings for some of the skills on the form. Poor 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response provides ratings for only a few skills on the form, or ratings are missing. Feedback:Based on your ratings, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides an accurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides a somewhat vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of the strengths and/or opportunities for improvement, or the summaries are missing. Feedback:Based on your self-assessment and theory of nursing practice, develop three to four (3–4) measurable goals and objectives for this Practicum experience. Include them on the designated area of the form.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides three to four (3–4) clear, appropriate, and measurable goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides three to four (3–4) appropriate, measurable goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides three to four (3–4) unclear or inappropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides three to four (3–4) unclear or inappropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience, or goals and objectives are missing. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling, nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided, which delineates all required criteria. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting—APA Format: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and Reference List.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥5) APA format errors. Feedback:| Total Points: 100 |
|---|
Name: PRAC_6645_Week1_Assignment2_Rubric
