Case Study #1

30 to >26.4 pts

Distinguished

Prioritizes at minimum 3 related differential diagnoses with applicable rationale including pertinent positives and negatives.

26.4 to >22.8 pts

Proficient

Prioritizes at minimum 2 accurate, related differential diagnoses with applicable rationale including pertinent positives and negatives.

22.8 to >20.4 pts

Emerging

Includes only 1 accurate, related differential diagnosis with applicable rationale including pertinent positives and negatives.

20.4 to >0 pts

Not evident

Incorrect and unprioritized differentials without rationales and/or pertinent positives and negatives

15 to >12.0 pts

Distinguished

No errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations. APA 7 format

12 to >9.0 pts

Proficient

Minor errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations. APA format with minor errors

9 to >8.0 pts

Emerging

Some errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations. APA 7 format with multiple errors

8 to >3.0 pts

Not evident

Major errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations. Improper citations and format

3 to >0 pts

No marks

Poorly organized details and grammatical errors without citations and improper format

15 to >13.0 pts

Distinguished

Incorporates several applicable scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of research.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient

Incorporates some applicable scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of research.

11 to >10.0 pts

Emerging

Incorporates very few applicable scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research.

10 to >4.0 pts

Not evident

Does not incorporate scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research

4 to >0 pts

Not evident

No referenced articles

20 to >15.0 pts

Distinguished

Draws insightful conclusions to create an evidence-based treatment plan with clear cited rationales considering social determinants of health.

15 to >10.0 pts

Emerging

Clear and thoughtful treatment plan with or without fully referenced rationales and consideration for social determinants of health with minor errors

10 to >5.0 pts

Emerging

Adequate treatment plan with referenced rationales and fair consideration for social determinants of health

5 to >0.0 pts

Not evident

Incomplete treatment plan without referenced rationales or consideration for social determinants of health

0 pts

No marks

Absent details

20 to >10.0 pts

Distinguished

Student provides thorough education regarding treatment plan with appropriate follow up and lists appropriate and reasonable groups for collaboration

10 to >8.0 pts

Proficient

Student provides minimum education regarding treatment plan with vague follow up and lists inappropriate groups for collaboration

8 to >5.0 pts

Emerging

Limited education or explanation related to treatment plan with inaccurate follow up and inaccurate collaborative groups

5 to >0.0 pts

Emerging

Poor education, No follow up and no collaborative groups

0 pts

No Marks

Absent details