Need Help

Morris0403

Rubricassignment5.docx

Home >Human Resource Management homework help >Need Help

Rubric Criteria

Total100 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellent

Team Member Selection

Team Member Selection

0 points

Identification of the four team members and an explanation of their selection is absent.

7.4 points

Identification of the four team members and an explanation of their selection is present but lacks detail.

7.9 points

Identification of the four team members and an explanation of their selection is provided.

8.7 points

Identification of the four team members and an explanation of their selection is concise.

10 points

Identification of the four team members an explanation of their selection is present and includes persuasive information from their profiles.

Assessment of Strengths and Weaknesses

Assessment of Strengths and Weaknesses

0 points

Identification of the primary strengths and weaknesses of the team and an assessment of their potential using justification from the individual profiles is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.

11.1 points

Identification of the primary strengths and weaknesses of the team and an assessment of their potential using justification from the individual profiles is vague or incomplete.

11.85 points

Identification of the primary strengths and weaknesses of the team and an assessment of their potential using justification from the individual profiles is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies.

13.05 points

Identification of the primary strengths and weaknesses of the team and an assessment of their potential using justification from the individual profiles is clear and integrated.

15 points

Identification of the primary strengths and weaknesses of the team and an assessment of their potential using justification from the individual profiles is thorough and well-integrated.

Motivation and Management Strategies (B)

Motivation and Management Strategies (C2.2)

0 points

Strategies for effective motivation, conflict management, and overall team success that cite specific motivational theories, conflict-resolution strategies, and leadership strategies are absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.

11.1 points

11.85 points

13.05 points

15 points

Embodiment of Conscious Capitalism

Embodiment of Conscious Capitalism

0 points

Justification for how the selected team embodies the values of conscious capitalism and how the tenet of stakeholder orientation played a role in the team selection process is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.

7.4 points

Justification for how the selected team embodies the values of conscious capitalism and how the tenet of stakeholder orientation played a role in the team selection process is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.

7.9 points

Justification for how the selected team embodies the values of conscious capitalism and how the tenet of stakeholder orientation played a role in the team selection process is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain inconsistencies.

8.7 points

Justification for how the selected team embodies the values of conscious capitalism and how the tenet of stakeholder orientation played a role in the team selection process is clear and integrated.

10 points

Justification for how the selected team embodies the values of conscious capitalism and how the tenet of stakeholder orientation played a role in the team selection process is thorough and well-integrated.

Stakeholder Value

Stakeholder Value

0 points

Description of how value is created for each stakeholder and ways the team will positively affect the business as a whole is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.

7.4 points

Description of how value is created for each stakeholder and ways the team will positively affect the business as a whole is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.

7.9 points

Description of how value is created for each stakeholder and ways the team will positively affect the business as a whole is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain inconsistencies.

8.7 points

Description of how value is created for each stakeholder and ways the team will positively affect the business as a whole is clear and integrated.

10 points

Description of how value is created for each stakeholder and ways the team will positively affect the business as a whole is thorough and well-integrated.

Presentation of Content

Presentation of Content

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

7.4 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

7.9 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

8.7 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

10 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

Recorded Video Presentation

Recorded Video Presentation

0 points

The recorded video presentation is absent.

7.4 points

The recorded video presentation is included but does not address the items from the PowerPoint presentation.

7.9 points

The recorded video presentation is included and may address some items from the PowerPoint presentation.

8.7 points

The recorded video presentation is included with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information from the PowerPoint presentation.

10 points

The recorded video presentation is clear and concise. Ideas progress and relate to each other while providing a clear sense of the purpose of the presentation.

Layout

Layout

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

3.7 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

3.95 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

4.35 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

5 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

3.7 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

3.95 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

4.35 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the target audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

5 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

3.7 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

3.95 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

4.35 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

3.7 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

3.95 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

4.35 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.