Question

Unacceptable

Needs Improvement

Competent

Exemplary

Examine the manner in which Walmart’s business philosophy has impacted its perception of being unethical toward supply and employee stakeholders. Provide one example of Walmart in an ethical situation.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely examined the manner in which Walmart’s business philosophy has impacted its perception of being unethical toward supply and employee stakeholders. Did not submit or incompletely provided one example of Walmart in an ethical situation.

Points:

20.25 (13.50%)

Partially examined the manner in which Walmart’s business philosophy has impacted its perception of being unethical toward supply and employee stakeholders. Partially provided one example of Walmart in an ethical situation.

Points:

22.95 (15.30%)

Satisfactorily examined the manner in which Walmart’s business philosophy has impacted its perception of being unethical toward supply and employee stakeholders. Satisfactorily provided one example of Walmart in an ethical situation.

Points:

27 (18.00%)

Thoroughly examined the manner in which Walmart’s business philosophy has impacted its perception of being unethical toward supply and employee stakeholders. Thoroughly provided one example of Walmart in an ethical situation.

Determine the major effects that Walmart’s business philosophy has had on its human resource practices and policies.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely determined the major effects that Walmart’s business philosophy has had on its human resource practices and policies.

Points:

20.25 (13.50%)

Partially determined the major effects that Walmart’s business philosophy has had on its human resource practices and policies.

Points:

22.95 (15.30%)

Satisfactorily determined the major effects that Walmart’s business philosophy has had on its human resource practices and policies.

Points:

27 (18.00%)

Thoroughly determined the major effects that Walmart’s business philosophy has had on its human resource practices and policies.

Analyze two of the legal mandates that workers and the U.S. government have accused Walmart of violating. Provide an explanation as to why these legal mandates were violated, citing specific violations.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed two of the legal mandates that workers and U.S. government have accused Walmart of violating. Did not submit or incompletely provided an explanation as to why these legal mandates were violated, citing specific violations.

Points:

20.25 (13.50%)

Partially analyzed two of the legal mandates that workers and U.S. government have accused Walmart of violating. Partially provided an explanation as to why these legal mandates were violated, citing specific violations.

Points:

22.95 (15.30%)

Satisfactorily analyzed two of the legal mandates that workers and U.S. government have accused Walmart of violating. Satisfactorily provided an explanation as to why these legal mandates were violated, citing specific violations.

Points:

27 (18.00%)

Thoroughly analyzed two of the legal mandates that workers and U.S. government have accused Walmart of violating. Thoroughly provided an explanation as to why these legal mandates were violated, citing specific violations.

Evaluate the efficiency of the structure of the ethical decision-making framework that Walmart has used in making its decisions. Provide a rationale for your response.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the efficiency of the structure of the ethical decision-making framework that Walmart has used in making its decisions. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Points:

20.25 (13.50%)

Partially evaluated the efficiency of the structure of the ethical decision-making framework that Walmart has used in making its decisions. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Points:

22.95 (15.30%)

Satisfactorily evaluated the efficiency of the structure of the ethical decision-making framework that Walmart has used in making its decisions. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Points:

27 (18.00%)

Thoroughly evaluated the efficiency of the structure of the ethical decision-making framework that Walmart has used in making its decisions. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

Recommend three actions that Walmart’s human resources department should take in order to improve the employees’ perspectives of Walmart’s human resources policies. Provide a rationale for your recommendations.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely recommended two actions that Walmart’s human resources department should take in order to improve the employees’ perspectives of Walmart’s human resources policies. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your recommendations.

Points:

20.25 (13.50%)

Partially recommended two actions that Walmart’s human resources department should take in order to improve the employees’ perspectives of Walmart’s human resources policies. Partially provided a rationale for your recommendations.

Points:

22.95 (15.30%)

Satisfactorily recommended two actions that Walmart’s human resources department should take in order to improve the employees’ perspectives of Walmart’s human resources policies. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your recommendations.

Points:

27 (18.00%)

Thoroughly recommended two actions that Walmart’s human resources department should take in order to improve the employees’ perspectives of Walmart’s human resources policies. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your recommendations.

Four references.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

No references provided.

Points:

5.625 (3.75%)

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references are poor-quality choices.

Points:

6.375 (4.25%)

Meets number of required references; all references are high-quality choices.

Points:

7.5 (5.00%)

Exceeds number of required references; all references are high-quality choices.

Writing mechanics, grammar, and formatting.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Points:

5.625 (3.75%)

Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Points:

6.375 (4.25%)

Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Points:

7.5 (5.00%)

Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.