WEEK 5

1 No submission 0.00%

2 Insufficient 65.00%

3 Approaching 75.00%

4 Acceptable 85.00%

5 Target 100.00%

100.0 %Criteria

25.0 %Learning Activities

Not addressed.

Learning activities are underdeveloped or poorly described or not aligned to the learning objective.

Learning activities are simple, sufficiently explained, and an attempt is made to align to the learning objective.

Learning activities are suitable, clearly explained, and logically aligned to the learning objective.

Learning activities are creative, comprehensively explained, and expertly aligned to the learning objective.

25.0 %Differentiation

Not addressed.

Differentiation to meet each student's learning needs is illogical and minimally explained.

Differentiation to meet each student's learning needs is plausible and adequately explained.

Differentiation to meet each student's learning needs is logical and explained in detail.

Differentiation to meet each student's learning needs is innovative and thoroughly explained.

25.0 %Home Extension Activity

Not addressed.

Home extension activity is incomplete or unrelated to demonstrating acquired knowledge and skills.

Home extension activity is sufficient to allow the student to demonstrate acquired knowledge and skills.

Home extension activity is appropriate and competently allows the student to demonstrate acquired knowledge and skills.

Home extension activity is novel and proficiently allows the student to demonstrate acquired knowledge and skills.

10.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Not addressed.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors are present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

5.0 %Originality

Not addressed.

The work is an extensive collection and rehash of the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness.

The product shows some evidence of originality. While based on the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people, the work does offer some new insights or inventiveness.

The product shows evidence of originality and inventiveness. While based somewhat on the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights and inventiveness.

The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research.

10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Not addressed.

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Includes some practice and content-related language.

Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few minor errors are present. Includes appropriate practice and content-related language.

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language.

100 %Total Weightage