Abnormal Psychology

12/9/21, 7:46 PM Rubric Assessment - PSY249C41 Abnormal Psychology: SS3 (Carrie Garman) FA21 - CCCOnline

https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=3178599&evalObjectId=2433983&evalObjectType=5&userId=113068… 1/5

Case Study Rubric Course: PSY249C41 Abnormal Psychology: SS3 (Carrie Garman) FA21

Criteria Excellent Proficient Developing Limited Evidence

No Evidence Criterion Score

Comprehens

ion &

Evaluation

/ 6060 points

Intake is filled

out

completely

and presents

detailed client

demographics,

social history

information,

legal history,

medical

history, etc.,

relevant to

creating a full

diagnostic

impression.

Describes the

onset of

problem,

symptoms,

impact

symptoms

have on daily

functioning,

client and

significant

other’s

interpretation

of what might

improve the

symptoms etc.

48 points

Intake is filled

out

completely

but may be

lacking minor

details. Intake

includes client

demographics,

social history

information,

legal history,

medical

history, etc.,

relevant to

creating a full

diagnostic

impression.

Describes the

onset of

problem,

symptoms,

impact

symptoms

have on daily

functioning,

client and

significant

other’s

interpretation

of what might

improve the

symptoms etc.

36 points

Intake is

missing key

components

or lacks detail

in many intake

subcategories.

Does not

create a full

diagnostic

impression.

Does not fully

describe the

onset of

problem,

symptoms,

impact

symptoms

have on daily

functioning,

client and

significant

other’s

interpretation

of what might

improve the

symptoms etc.

24 points

Intake in only

partially filled

out with

sparse details.

Does not

create a

diagnostic

impression

and lacks

clinical and

diagnostic

insight

0 points

Missing,

incomplete, or

severely

lacking

12/9/21, 7:46 PM Rubric Assessment - PSY249C41 Abnormal Psychology: SS3 (Carrie Garman) FA21 - CCCOnline

https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=3178599&evalObjectId=2433983&evalObjectType=5&userId=113068… 2/5

Criteria Excellent Proficient Developing Limited Evidence

No Evidence Criterion Score

Diagnosis / 3030 points

Based on the

information

provided on

the intake

form and the

diagnostic

criteria from

the DSM,

accurately

diagnoses the

client.

Describes in

detail a

diagnostic

rationale,

providing

details the

client’s

behaviors,

emotions,

severity,

symptoms,

duration, etc.

and how these

meets the

DSM

diagnostic

criteria

24 points

Based on the

information

provided on

the intake

form and the

diagnostic

criteria from

the DSM,

accurately

diagnoses the

client.

Describes a

diagnostic

rationale,

providing

details the

client’s

behaviors,

emotions,

severity,

symptoms,

duration, etc.

and how these

meets the

DSM

diagnostic

criteria but

may be

missing minor

information

18 points

Diagnosis is

missing key

components

of

symptomology

, diagnostic

rationale, and

details

regarding the

client’s

behaviors,

emotions,

severity,

symptoms,

duration, etc.

12 points

Diagnosis

does not

match

information

provided in

the intake and

is missing

significant

details

regarding

symptomology

and diagnostic

rationale

0 points

Missing,

incomplete, or

severely

lacking

12/9/21, 7:46 PM Rubric Assessment - PSY249C41 Abnormal Psychology: SS3 (Carrie Garman) FA21 - CCCOnline

https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=3178599&evalObjectId=2433983&evalObjectType=5&userId=113068… 3/5

Criteria Excellent Proficient Developing Limited Evidence

No Evidence Criterion Score

Treatment

Strategies

/ 3535 points

Proposes two

evidence-

based

treatment

strategies that

might be used

to treat the

client.

Describes in

detail why

these

strategies are

applicable to

the client’s

treatment

based on solid

and current

academic

research.

Cites at least

two high

quality,

academic,

researched-

based

resources

(peer-

reviewed

journal articles

or books

published by

the ACA or

APA) for each

treatment

strategy

28 points

Proposes two

evidence-

based

treatment

strategies that

might be used

to treat the

client.

Describes in

why these

strategies are

applicable to

the client’s

treatment

based on solid

and current

academic

research, but

may be

missing minor

information.

Cites at least

two high

quality,

academic,

researched-

based

resources

(peer-

reviewed

journal articles

or books

published by

the ACA or

APA) for each

treatment

strategy

21 points

Proposes only

one evidence-

based

treatment

strategy that

might be used

to treat the

client.

Describes in

why these

strategies are

applicable to

the client’s

treatment

based on solid

and current

academic

research, but

is missing

important

information.

Cites at least

one high

quality,

academic,

researched-

based

resource but it

is not a peer-

reviewed

journal article

or a book

published by

the ACA or

APA

14 points

Proposes only

one evidence-

based

treatment

strategy that

might be used

to treat the

client.

Describes in

why these

strategies are

applicable to

the client’s

treatment but

is not based

on solid and

current

academic

research. Cites

at least one

source, but

source is not

academic

0 points

Missing,

incomplete, or

severely

lacking

12/9/21, 7:46 PM Rubric Assessment - PSY249C41 Abnormal Psychology: SS3 (Carrie Garman) FA21 - CCCOnline

https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=3178599&evalObjectId=2433983&evalObjectType=5&userId=113068… 4/5

Criteria Excellent Proficient Developing Limited Evidence

No Evidence Criterion Score

Participation / 6060 points

Makes

complete,

thoughtful,

and in-depth

responses to

at least three

of your peers

in relation to

their case

studies (250

words each).

Offers

feedback on

the treatment

strategies that

the clinician

has suggested

which

stimulates

additional

thought,

makes new

inferences or

associations,

offers

additional

sources of

relevant

information,

broadening or

bringing more

specificity to

the topic

48 points

Makes

thoughtful,

and in-depth

responses to

at least three

of your peers

in relation to

their case

studies

(between 249

and 200 words

each). Offers

feedback on

the treatment

strategies that

the clinician

has suggested

which

stimulates

additional

thought,

makes new

inferences or

associations,

offers

additional

sources of

relevant

information,

broadening or

bringing more

specificity to

the topic

36 points

Replies to two

fellow

students

(between 249

and 200

words)

Or

Replies to

three students

with posts

199 words or

less.

24 points

Replies to only

one student

with a post of

200-250

words

Or

Replies to two

students with

a post less

than 200

words.

Or

Replies to 3

peers with

posts of 100

words or less.

0 points

Does not reply

or reply is

severely

lacking

12/9/21, 7:46 PM Rubric Assessment - PSY249C41 Abnormal Psychology: SS3 (Carrie Garman) FA21 - CCCOnline

https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=3178599&evalObjectId=2433983&evalObjectType=5&userId=113068… 5/5

Total / 200

Overall Score

Criteria Excellent Proficient Developing Limited Evidence

No Evidence Criterion Score

Timeliness / 1515 points

Submits a

complete

mock

counseling

intake by the

due date given

in the Course

Schedule

12 points

Submits a

complete

mock

counseling

intake within

24 hours after

the due date

given in

the Course

Schedule

9 points

Submits a

complete

mock

counseling

intake more

than 48 hours

after the due

date given in

the Course

Schedule

6 points

Submits an

incomplete

complete

mock

counseling

intake, or

submits a

mock

counseling

intake more

than 72 hours

after the due

date given in

the Course

Schedule

0 points

Missing,

incomplete,

severely

lacking, or

posts on the

final two days

of the

discussion.

Exemplary 161 points

minimum

Proficient 121 points

minimum

Developing 81 points

minimum

Limited

Evidence 1 point minimum

No Evidence 0 points

minimum