PROJECT
benita01
RubricAssessment-PROJECT3.pdf
2/22/22, 8:04 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Applications in Cybe… Management and Policy (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assess…5247&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0
Project #3: Summary Presenta!on Course: CSIA 485 6380 Prac!cal Applica!ons in Cybersecurity Management and Policy (2222)
Criteria Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement Needs Significant Improvement
Missing or Unacceptable
Business Context /
Use of Scenario
Overview for M&A
Effort
Cybersecurity
Strategy
Implementa!on Plan
10 points
Implementa!on plan
clearly, concisely, and
accurately incorporated
informa!on about the
designated business
context and scenario
informa!on as presented
in the course readings.
No evidence present
indica!ng use of previous
course scenarios.
8 points
Implementa!on plan
clearly and accurately
incorporated informa!on
about the designated
business context and
scenario informa!on as
presented in the course
readings. No evidence
present indica!ng use of
previous course
scenarios.
7 points
Implementa!on plan
accurately incorporated
informa!on about the
designated business
context and scenario
informa!on as presented
in the course readings.
No evidence present
indica!ng use of previous
course scenarios.
4 points
Implementa!on plan
used relevant informa!on
from the designated
business context and
scenario as presented in
the course readings.
2 points
Deliverable used some
informa!on related to
the designated company
or industry.
0 points
Deliverable did not
incorporate informa!on
from the designated
business context /
scenario as presented in
the course readings.
20 points
Provided an excellent
overview of the M&A
effort using informa!on
from the company
profile, weekly
descrip!ons,
assignments, and course
readings. Included at
least 10 slides in this
sec!on and answered the
5 important ques!ons:
who, what, where, why,
and how.
18 points
Provided an outstanding
overview of the M&A
effort using informa!on
from the company
profile, weekly
descrip!ons,
assignments, and course
readings. Included 8 or
more slides in this
sec!on and answered
these important
ques!ons: who, what,
where, and why.
16 points
Provided an acceptable
overview of the M&A
effort using informa!on
from the company
profile, weekly
descrip!ons,
assignments, and course
readings. Included 6 or
more slides in this
sec!on and answered
these important
ques!ons: who, what,
and why.
10 points
Provided an overview for
the M&A effort but the
sec!on lacked important
details. Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
cited and used in the
overview.
4 points
A#empted to provide an
introduc!on to the M& A
effort but this sec!on
lacked detail, was off
topic, and/or was not
well supported by
informa!on drawn from
authorita!ve sources.
0 points
This sec!on was missing,
off topic, or failed to
provide relevant
informa!on.
15 points
Provided an excellent
summary of the proposed
Cybersecurity Strategy
using informa!on from
the company profile,
weekly descrip!ons,
discussion papers,
course readings and
Project #1. Included at
least 10 slides in this
sec!on and answered the
5 important ques!ons:
who, what, where, why,
and how.
13.5 points
Provided an outstanding
summary of the proposed
Cybersecurity Strategy
using informa!on from
the company profile,
weekly descrip!ons,
discussion papers, course
readings, and Project #1.
Included 8 or more slides
in this sec!on and
answered these
important ques!ons:
what, where, why, and
how.
12 points
Provided an acceptable
summary of the proposed
Cybersecurity Strategy
using informa!on from
the company profile,
weekly descrip!ons,
discussion papers, course
readings, and Project #1.
Included 6 or more slides
in this sec!on and
answered these
important ques!ons:
what, why, and how.
6 points
Provided a summary for
the Cybersecurity
Strategy (Project #1) but
the sec!on lacked
important details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
cited and used in the
overview.
4 points
A#empted to provide
informa!on about the
Cybersecurity Strategy.
The discussion was
significantly lacking in
detail and/or was not
well supported by
informa!on drawn from
authorita!ve sources.
0 points
This sec!on was missing,
off topic, or failed to
provide relevant
informa!on.
15 points
Provided an excellent
summary of the proposed
Implementa!on Plan
using informa!on from
the company profile,
weekly descrip!ons,
discussion papers,
course readings and
Project #2. Included at
least 10 slides in this
sec!on and answered the
5 important ques!ons:
13.5 points
Provided an outstanding
summary of the proposed
Implementa!on Plan
using informa!on from
the company profile,
weekly descrip!ons,
discussion papers, course
readings, and Project #2.
Included 8 or more slides
in this sec!on and
answered these
important ques!ons:
12 points
Provided an acceptable
summary of the proposed
Implementa!on Plan
using informa!on from
the company profile,
weekly descrip!ons,
discussion papers, course
readings, and Project #2.
Included 6 or more slides
in this sec!on and
answered these
important ques!ons:
6 points
Provided a summary for
the Cybersecurity
Strategy (Project #2) but
the sec!on lacked
important details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
cited and used in the
overview.
4 points
A#empted to provide
informa!on about the
scope, assump!ons,
and/or constraints for
the implementa!on plan.
The discussion was
significantly lacking in
detail and/or was not
well supported by
informa!on drawn from
authorita!ve sources.
0 points
This sec!on was missing,
off topic, or failed to
provide relevant
informa!on.
2/22/22, 8:04 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Applications in Cybe… Management and Policy (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 2 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assess…5247&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0
Barriers to Success
Summary and
Recommenda!ons
Professionalism:
Consistent Use and
Forma$ng for
Cita!ons and
Reference List
Professionalism:
Organiza!on,
Appearance, &
Execu!on (including
slide notes)
who, what, where, why,
and how. Slides included
an overview diagram for
the Enterprise
Architecture.
what, where, why, and
how. Slides included an
overview diagram for the
Enterprise Architecture.
what, why, and how.
Slides included an
overview diagram for the
Enterprise Architecture.
10 points
Clearly and concisely
presented 5 or more
barriers to successful implementa!on of the Cybersecurity Strategy
and Implementa!on Plan.
Included at least 5 slides
in this sec!on and
answered the 5
important ques!ons for
each barrier to success:
who, what, where, why,
and how to overcome
(compensatory controls).
8.5 points
Presented 5 or more
barriers to successful
implementa!on of the
Cybersecurity Strategy
and Implementa!on Plan.
Included at least 5 slides
in this sec!on and
answered these
important ques!ons for
each barrier to success:
what, where, why, and
how to overcome
(compensatory controls).
7 points
Presented 3 or more
barriers to successful
implementa!on of the
Cybersecurity Strategy
and Implementa!on Plan.
Included at least 3 slides
in this sec!on and
answered these
important ques!ons for
each barrier to success:
what, why, and how to
overcome (compensatory
controls).
4 points
Provided a summary of
barriers to successful
implementa!on of the
security strategy and
implementa!on plan.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
cited and used.
2 points
A#empted to provide
informa!on about
barriers to success. The
discussion was
significantly lacking in
detail and/or was not
well supported by
informa!on drawn from
authorita!ve sources.
0 points
This sec!on was missing,
off topic, or failed to
provide relevant
informa!on.
10 points
Provided a summary
sec!on which clearly and
concisely presented a
recommenda!on for
approval and adop!on of
the proposed
cybersecurity strategy
and the proposed
implementa!on plan.
Presented at least 5
major business benefits
for adop!on and
implementa!on.
8.5 points
Provided an outstanding
summary sec!on which
included a
recommenda!on for
approval and adop!on of
the proposed
cybersecurity strategy
and the proposed
implementa!on plan.
Presented at least 3
major business benefits
for adop!on and
implementa!on.
7 points
Provided an acceptable
summary sec!on which
included a
recommenda!on for
approval and adop!on of
the proposed
cybersecurity strategy
and the proposed
implementa!on plan.
Presented at least 1
major business benefit of
the adop!on and
implementa!on.
4 points
Provided a summary slide
which included a
recommenda!on for
approval and adop!on of
the proposed
cybersecurity strategy
and the proposed
implementa!on plan.
2 points
A#empted to provide a
summary for the
presenta!on. The
discussion was
significantly lacking in
detail and/or was not
well supported by
informa!on drawn from
authorita!ve sources.
0 points
5 points
Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited resources. Sufficient information is provided to allow a reader to find and retrieve the cited sources. Reference list entries and in- text citations are consistently and correctly formatted using an appropriate citation style (APA, MLA, etc.).
4 points
Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited resources. Sufficient information is provided to allow a reader to find and retrieve the cited sources. One or two inconsistencies or errors in format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries.
3 points
Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited resources. Sufficient information is provided to allow a reader to find and retrieve the cited sources. No more than 5 inconsistencies or errors in format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries.
2 points
Work has no more than three paragraphs with omissions of citations crediting sources for facts and information. Work contains a reference list containing entries for cited resources. Work contains no more than 10 inconsistencies or errors in format.
1 point
Work attempts to credit sources but demonstrates a fundamental failure to understand and/or consistently apply a professional formatting style for the reference list and/or citations.
0 points
Reference list is missing. Work demonstrates an overall failure to incorporate and/or credit authoritative sources for information used in the paper.
15 points
Provided an excellent presentation containing a title slide, section title slides, and 30 or more content slides with slide notes. Slide design was appropriate for an executive audience. Submitted work shows outstanding organization and the use of color, fonts, titles, headings and sub-headings, etc. is appropriate to the assignment type. No formatting, grammar, spelling, or punctuation
13.5 points
Provided an outstanding presentation containing a title slide, section title slides, and 15 or more content slides with slide notes. Slide design was appropriate for an executive audience. Submitted work has minor style or formatting flaws but still presents a professional appearance. Submitted work is well organized and appropriately uses color, fonts, and section headings. Work contains minor errors
12 points
Provided an acceptable presentation containing a title slide, section title slides, and 12 or more content slides with slide notes. Slide design was appropriate for an executive audience. Organization and/or appearance of submitted work needs improvement. Errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation which detract from professional appearance of the submitted work.
6 points
Presentation had 11 or fewer slides or had no slide notes. Submitted work has multiple significant errors in style or formatting, spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation. Work is unprofessional in appearance. Work requires substantial rewrite to improve professional appearance.
4 points
Submitted work is difficult to read / understand and has significant errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, punctuation, or word usage. Work is disorganized and needs to be rewritten for readability and professional appearance.
0 points
No work submitted.
2/22/22, 8:04 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Applications in Cybe… Management and Policy (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 3 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assess…5247&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0
Total
Overall Score
errors. in formatting, grammar, spelling or punctuation which do not significantly impact professional appearance.
Do Not Use This Box 0 points minimum
