YISELL ASSESS

Criteria Exempla ry (100)

Compet ent (90)

Developi ng (80)

Emergin g (70)

Not Submitt ed (0)

Content & Clinical Accurac y (40 pts)

Thoroug h and accurate discussio n of complain t and three differenti al diagnose s; strong clinical reasonin g.

Mostly accurate and clear; minor gaps.

Some inaccura cies; limited clinical depth.

Major inaccura cies or very limited discussio n.

Not submitte d.

Use of Evidenc e (25 pts)

At least 3 current, high- quality research articles integrate d effectivel y; guideline s included as appropri ate.

Meets minimu m source requirem ent but integrati on could be stronger.

Uses fewer than 3 articles or sources not fully current/ relevant.

Little to no scholarly support.

Not submitte d.

Organiz ation & Clarity (20 pts)

Excellent flow, well- structure d sections, professio nal writing.

Clear overall, some minor issues with flow or clarity.

Organiza tion is uneven, some confusio n.

Poorly organize d and unclear.

Not submitte d.

APA Formatt ing (10 pts)

Flawless APA 7th edition formattin g.

Few minor APA errors.

Multiple APA errors.

Major APA issues or formattin g not followed.

Not submitte d.

Professi onalism (5 pts)

Academi c tone maintain ed, originalit y upheld.

Minor lapses in tone or mechani cs.

Noticeab le grammar or tone issues.

Frequent errors or unprofes sional style.

Not submitte d.