MHA5030 WEEK 2 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT

profilefewa46
RubricAssessment-MHA5030-CurrentEconomicsinHealthcareWeek2Discussion.pdf

1/19/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics in Healthcare SU01 - South University

https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=359328&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=29&d2l_bod… 1/3

Criteria Unacceptable 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) 27 points

Satisfactory (C Range) 31 points

Above Average (B Range) 35 points

Exemplary (A Range) 40 points

Criterion Score

Quality

of

Initial

Posting

/ 40No initial posting to evaluate

The information

provided is

inaccurate, not

focused on the

assignment’s topic,

and/or does not

answer the

question(s) fully.

Response

demonstrates

incomplete

understanding of the

topic and/or

inadequate

preparation.

The information provided is

accurate, giving a basic

understanding of the

topic(s) covered. A basic

understanding is when you

are able to describe the

terms and concepts

covered. Despite this basic

understanding, initial

posting may not include

complete development of

all aspects of the

assignment.

The information provided is

accurate, displaying a good

understanding of the topic(s)

covered. A good

understanding is when you

are able to explain the terms

and topics covered. Initial

posting demonstrates sincere

reflection and addresses

most aspects of the

assignment, although all

concepts may not be fully

developed.

The information

provided is accurate,

providing an in-depth,

well thought-out

understanding of the

topic(s) covered. An in-

depth understanding

provides an analysis of

the information,

synthesizing what is

learned from the

course/assigned

readings.

Criteria Unacceptable 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) 13 points

Satisfactory (C Range) 15 points

Satisfactory (C Range) 17 points

Exemplary (A Range) 20 points

Criterion Score

Participation

in

Discussion

/ 20No responses to other classmates in

this discussion forum

May include one or

more of the

following:

*Comments to only

one other student's

post.

*Comments are not

substantive, such as

Comments to two or

more classmates’ initial

posts but only on one

day of the week.

Comments are

substantive, meaning

they reflect and expand

Comments to two or

more classmates’ initial

posts on more than one

day. Comments are

substantive, meaning

they reflect and expand

on what the other

student wrote.

Comments to two or

more classmates’ initial

posts and to the

instructor's comment (if

applicable) on two or

more days. Responses

demonstrate an analysis

of peers’ comments,

1/19/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics in Healthcare SU01 - South University

https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=359328&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=29&d2l_bod… 2/3

Total / 80

Overall Score

Writing

Mechanics

(Spelling,

Grammar,

APA) and

Information

Literacy

/ 20

just one line or

saying, “Good job” or

“I agree.

*Comments are off

topic.

on what the other

student wrote.

building on previous

posts. Comments extend

and deepen meaningful

conversation and may

include a follow-up

question.

No postings for

which to evaluate

language and

grammar

Numerous issues in

any of the following:

grammar, mechanics,

spelling, use of slang,

and incomplete or

missing APA

citations and

references. If

required for the

assignment, did not

use course, text,

and/or outside

readings (where

relevant) to support

work.

Some spelling,

grammatical, and/or

structural errors. Some

errors in APA

formatting (citations

and references). If

required for the

assignment, utilizes

sources to support

work for initial post but

not comments to other

students. Sources

include course/text

readings but outside

sources (when relevant)

include non-

academic/authoritative,

such as Wikis and .com

resources.

Minor errors in grammar,

mechanics, or spelling in

the initial posting. Minor

errors in APA formatting

(citations and references).

If required for the

assignment, utilizes

sources to support work

for both the initial post

and some of the

comments to other

students. Sources include

course and text readings

as well as outside sources

(when relevant) that are

academic and

authoritative (e.g., journal

articles, other text books,

.gov web sites,

professional organization

web sites).

Minor to no errors in

grammar, mechanics, or

spelling in both the initial

post and comments to

others. APA formatting is

correct. If required for

the assignment, utilizes

sources to support work

for both the initial post

and the comments to

other students. Sources

include course and text

readings as well as

outside sources (when

relevant) that are

academic and

authoritative (e.g.,

journal articles, other

text books, .gov web

sites, professional

organization web sites).

1/19/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA5030-Current Economics in Healthcare SU01 - South University

https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=74312&evalObjectId=359328&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=29&d2l_bod… 3/3

Close

Unacceptable 0 points

minimum

Emerging (F through D

Range) 1 point minimum

Satisfactory (C

Range) 54 points minimum

Above Average (B

Range) 62 points minimum

Exemplary (A

Range) 70 points minimum