discussion

profilehelpastudent17
RubricAssessment-CCJS3456381IntroductiontoSecurityManagement2262-UMGCLearningManagementSystem.pdf

CCJS/PSAD Program Discussion Rubric Course: CCJS 345 6381 Introduction to Security Management (2262)

Criteria Excellent Above Average

Average Below Average

Poor Criterion Score

1/12/26, 10:42 PM Rubric Assessment - CCJS 345 6381 Introduction to Security Management (2262) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=1374414&evalObjectId=5206268&evalObjectType=5&userId=682428&grou… 1/5

Criteria Excellent Above Average

Average Below Average

Poor Criterion Score

Content

of origi-

nal post/

demon-

stration

of materi-

al com-

mand/ in-

tegration

of course

materials

and other

readings.

/ 1515 points

Demonstrated

a clear under-

standing of

the weekly

material/sub-

ject and ar-

ticulated com-

mand of con-

tent/subject

into well stat-

ed post re-

sponses;

and/or dis-

played critical

thinking by

bringing in

more than 2

relevant re-

sources and

by promoting

significant

further

thought on

the topic.

Points avail-

able: 13.5-15

13.4 points

Displayed a

good under-

standing of

weekly ma-

terial /sub-

ject that was

presented in

most posts;

and/or dis-

played criti-

cal thinking

by bringing

in at least 2

relevant re-

sources pro-

moting fur-

ther

thoughts on

the topic.

Points avail-

able: 12-

13.4

11.9 points

Displayed an

understand-

ing of weekly

material/sub-

ject but did

not fully ar-

ticulate their

understand-

ing; and/or

displayed

minimal criti-

cal thinking

by bringing

in only 2 rel-

evant re-

sources that

minimally

promoted

further

thoughts on

the topic.

Points avail-

able: 10.5-

11.9

10.4 points

Displayed

very little

understand-

ing of the

weekly ma-

terial /sub-

ject and did

not articu-

late an un-

derstanding;

and/or did

not demon-

strate critical

thinking as

evidenced

by having 1

or less rele-

vant re-

sources

which mini-

mally pro-

moted fur-

ther

thoughts on

the topic;

and/or dis-

played poor

command of

subject

matter.

Points avail-

able: 9-10.4

8.9 points

Failed to dis-

play any un-

derstanding

of the week's

materials;

and/or incor-

rectly ad-

dressed the

weekly ma-

terial/sub-

ject; and/ or

did not dis-

play critical

thinking; or

did not bring

in relevant

resources to

support

thoughts; or

did not pro-

mote further

thoughts on

the topic; or

did not dis-

play com-

mand of sub-

ject matter.

Points avail-

able: 0-8.9

No post = 0

1/12/26, 10:42 PM Rubric Assessment - CCJS 345 6381 Introduction to Security Management (2262) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=1374414&evalObjectId=5206268&evalObjectType=5&userId=682428&grou… 2/5

Criteria Excellent Above Average

Average Below Average

Poor Criterion Score

Timelines

s of origi-

nal post

/ 3.75

Peer re-

sponse

content/

weekly

involve-

ment in

discus-

sion

board.

/ 7.5

3.75 points

Posts original

discussions by

day three (3)

of the acade-

mic week.

Points avail-

able: 3.38 -

3.75

3.37 points

Posts origi-

nal discus-

sions by day

four (4) of

the academ-

ic week.

Points avail-

able: 3 -

3.37

2.99 points

Posts original

discussions

by day five

(5) of the

academic

week.

Points avail-

able: 2.63 -

2.99

2.62 points

Posts origi-

nal discus-

sion by day

six (6) of the

academic

week.

Points avail-

able: 2.25 -

2.62

2.24 points

Posts original

discussion by

day seven (7)

of the acade-

mic week.

Points

available

F: 0-2.24

No Post = 0

7.5 points

Engaged in

discussion

with at least

three (3)

peers where-

by an idea

was built

upon or refut-

ed and dis-

played exem-

plary critical

thinking.

Points avail-

able: 6.75 -

7.5

6.74 points

Engaged in

discussion

with at least

two (2)

peers

whereby an

idea was

built upon or

refuted and

displayed

good critical

thinking.

Points avail-

able: 6 -

6.74

5.99 points

Engaged in

discussion

with at least

one (1) peer

whereby an

idea was

built upon or

refuted.

Points avail-

able: 5.25 -

5.99

5.24 points

Replies to

others but

did not build

upon or re-

fute peer

thoughts.

Points avail-

able D: 4.5 -

5.24

F: 0-4.49

0 points

Did not en-

gage in dis-

cussion with

peers

1/12/26, 10:42 PM Rubric Assessment - CCJS 345 6381 Introduction to Security Management (2262) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=1374414&evalObjectId=5206268&evalObjectType=5&userId=682428&grou… 3/5

Total / 37.5

Criteria Excellent Above Average

Average Below Average

Poor Criterion Score

Timelines

s of peer

posts.

/ 3.75

Adherenc

e to

Discussio

n Forum

Standards

and

Guideline

s.

/ 7.5

3.75 points

Started peer

discussions by

day four (4) of

the academic

week.

Points avail-

able: 3.38 -

3.75

3.37 points

Started peer

discussions

by day five

(5) of the

academic

week.

Points avail-

able: 3 -

3.37

2.99 points

Started peer

discussions

by day six (6)

of the acade-

mic week.

Points avail-

able: 2.63 -

2.99

2.62 points

Started peer

discussion

by day seven

(7) of the

academic

week.

Points avail-

able: 0.1 -

2.62

0 points

There was no

peer post.

7.5 points

All standards

followed as

required (i.e.

APA format;

grammar; ci-

tations; refer-

ences, other

standards as

required).

Points avail-

able: 6.75 -

7.5

6.74 points

1 discussion

standard not

followed (i.e.

APA format;

grammar; ci-

tations; ref-

erences, oth-

er standards

as required).

Points avail-

able: 6 -

6.74

5.99 points

2-3 discus-

sion stan-

dards not

followed (i.e.

APA format;

grammar; ci-

tations; ref-

erences, oth-

er standards

as required).

Points avail-

able: 5.25 -

5.99

5.24 points

4 or more

discussion

standards

not followed

(i.e. APA for-

mat; gram-

mar; cita-

tions; refer-

ences, other

standards as

required).

Points avail-

able D: 4.5 -

5.24

F: 0-4.49

0 points

No posts for

the

discussion.

1/12/26, 10:42 PM Rubric Assessment - CCJS 345 6381 Introduction to Security Management (2262) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=1374414&evalObjectId=5206268&evalObjectType=5&userId=682428&grou… 4/5

Overall Score

Excellent -

Equivalent to

an A 33.75 points minimum

Above Average -

Equivalent to an B 30 points minimum

Average -

Equivalent to

an C 26.25 points minimum

Below Average -

Equivalent to an D 22.5 points minimum

Poor -

Equivalent to

an F 0 points minimum

1/12/26, 10:42 PM Rubric Assessment - CCJS 345 6381 Introduction to Security Management (2262) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=1374414&evalObjectId=5206268&evalObjectType=5&userId=682428&grou… 5/5