WRITING 2-4 PAGES
pmcclam1982
RUBRICASS2.docxElement 1: Reasons for Successful Organizational Change--
Levels of Achievement:
Superior Criteria 10 (10%) points
Student presents a thorough and detailed examination of the reasons for successful organizational change. Several sources and examples support thinking.
Excellent Criteria 9.5 (9.5%) points
Student presents a thorough and detailed examination of the reasons for successful organizational change. Several sources and examples support thinking. There are one or two minor errors in examination.
Satisfactory Criteria 8.5 (8.5%) points
Student presents an examination of some of the reasons for successful organizational change. Some sources and examples support thinking.
Marginal Criteria 7.5 (7.5%) points
Student presents a cursory or incomplete examination of the reasons for successful organizational change. Few sources or examples support thinking.
Unsatisfactory Criteria 5 (5%) points
Does not meet minimal standards.
Not Submitted 0 (0%) points
Did not submit element.
Feedback:
Element 2: Personal Experience/Knowledge with Organizational Changes--
Levels of Achievement:
Superior Criteria 10 (10%) points
Student presents a thorough and detailed evaluation of his/her personal experience with or knowledge of organizational changes, both successful and unsuccessful. Several sources and examples support thinking.
Excellent Criteria 9.5 (9.5%) points
Student presents a thorough and detailed evaluation of his/her personal experience with or knowledge of organizational changes, both successful and unsuccessful. Several sources and examples support thinking. There are one or two minor errors in explanation.
Satisfactory Criteria 8.5 (8.5%) points
Student presents an evaluation with some details of his/her personal experience with or knowledge of organizational changes, both successful and unsuccessful. Some sources and examples support thinking.
Marginal Criteria 7.5 (7.5%) points
Student presents a cursory or incomplete evaluation of his/her personal experience with or knowledge of organizational changes, and/or does not identify both successful and unsuccessful. Few sources or examples support thinking.
Unsatisfactory Criteria 5 (5%) points
Does not meet minimal standards.
Not Submitted 0 (0%) points
Did not submit element.
Feedback:
Element 3: Organizational Change Philosophies and/or Models--
Levels of Achievement:
Superior Criteria 10 (10%) points
Student presents a thorough and detailed analysis of organizational change philosophies and/or models that contain concepts that support and/or refute his/her successful and unsuccessful organizational change experiences. Several sources and examples support thinking.
Excellent Criteria 9.5 (9.5%) points
Student presents a thorough and detailed analysis of organizational change philosophies and/or models that contain concepts that support and/or refute his/her successful and unsuccessful organizational change experiences. Several sources and examples support thinking. There are one or two minor errors in explanation.
Satisfactory Criteria 8.5 (8.5%) points
Student presents an analysis of some organizational change philosophies and/or models that contain concepts that support and/or refute his/her successful and unsuccessful organizational change experiences. Some sources and examples support thinking.
Marginal Criteria 7.5 (7.5%) points
Student presents a cursory or incomplete analysis of organizational change philosophies and/or models that contain concepts that support and/or refute his/her successful and unsuccessful organizational change experiences. Few sources or examples support thinking.
Unsatisfactory Criteria 5 (5%) points
Does not meet minimal standards.
Not Submitted 0 (0%) points
Did not submit element.
Feedback:
Element 4: Synthesis of Learning Resources--
Levels of Achievement:
Superior Criteria 10 (10%) points
Student presents a thorough and detailed synthesis of the Learning Resources along with appropriately formatted references to 2-3 scholarly, peer-reviewed articles per page of his/her paper to support his/her assertions.
Excellent Criteria 9.5 (9.5%) points
Student presents a thorough and detailed synthesis of the Learning Resources along with appropriately formatted references to 2-3 scholarly, peer-reviewed articles per page of his/her paper to support his/her assertions. There are one or two minor errors in assessment.
Satisfactory Criteria 8.5 (8.5%) points
Student presents an explanation that somewhat synthesizes the Learning Resources along with appropriately formatted references to 2-3 scholarly, peer-reviewed articles per page of his/her paper to support his/her assertions.
Marginal Criteria 7.5 (7.5%) points
Student presents a cursory or incomplete synthesis of the Learning Resources and/or does not include appropriately formatted references to 2-3 scholarly, peer-reviewed articles per page of his/her paper to support his/her assertions.
Unsatisfactory Criteria 5 (5%) points
Does not meet minimal standards.
Not Submitted 0 (0%) points
Did not submit element.
Feedback:
Element 5: Critical Thinking--
Levels of Achievement:
Superior Criteria 30 (30%) points
Writing exhibits excellent evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking; careful examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with detailed supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyze patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned, superb arguments.
Excellent Criteria 28.5 (28.5%) points
Writing exhibits excellent evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking; careful examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with detailed supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyze patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned, superb arguments. There are one or two minor errors in explanation.
Satisfactory Criteria 25.5 (25.5%) points
Writing exhibits some evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking. A good examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with some supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned arguments adequately, but not superbly.
Marginal Criteria 22.5 (22.5%) points
Writing exhibits little evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking. Examination is not made of assumptions and possible biases. Writing does not synthesize the classroom experiences and content; nor analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice. Logical conclusions based on well-reasoned arguments are not exhibited.
Unsatisfactory Criteria 15 (15%) points
Does not meet minimal standards.
Not Submitted 0 (0%) points
Did not submit element.
Feedback:
Element 6: Written Delivery Style & Grammar--
Levels of Achievement:
Superior Criteria 15 (15%) points
Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.
Excellent Criteria 14.25 (14.25%) points
Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.
Satisfactory Criteria 12.75 (12.75%) points
Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.
Marginal Criteria 11.25 (11.25%) points
Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.
Unsatisfactory Criteria 7.5 (7.5%) points
Does not meet minimal standards.
Not Submitted 0 (0%) points
Did not submit element.
Feedback:
Element 7: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations)--
Levels of Achievement:
Superior Criteria 15 (15%) points
Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.
Excellent Criteria 14.25 (14.25%) points
Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.
Satisfactory Criteria 12.75 (12.75%) points
Student mostly adheres to scholarly reference requirements and/or mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.
Marginal Criteria 11.25 (11.25%) points
Student demonstrates weak or inconsistent adherence scholarly reference requirements and/or weak or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.
Unsatisfactory Criteria 7.5 (7.5%) points
Does not meet minimal standards.
Not Submitted 0 (0%) points
Did not submit element.
28.5 <span class=
0.2550000
25.5 <span class=
0.2250000
0.0950000
22.5 <span class=
0.1500000
15 <span class='r
0.1500000
0.1425000
14.25 <span class
9.5 <span class='
0.1275000
12.75 <span class
0.1125000
11.25 <span class
0.1425000
0.0850000
8.5 <span class='
0.0750000
7.5 <span class='
0.0500000
5 <span class='ra
0.0000000
0 <span class='ra
0.1000000
0.0950000
0.1000000
0.0000000
10 <span class='r
0.3000000
30 <span class='r
0.2850000
