SOCW 6520 Assignment 3 wk 9 : process recording

Feedback from instructor of week 6 process recording

Your process recording provided a very clear transcript of the dialog with the client. You also identified tools and skills utilized during dialog, but no mention of theory. You provided a good explanation of personal reactions to interaction with client.

Rubric Detail

 

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Top of Form

Name: SOCW_6520_Week8_Assignment2_Rubric

· Grid View

· List View

 Show Descriptions  Show Feedback

Transcript--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 28.35 (31.50%) - 31.5 (35.00%)

The written transcript provides a thorough explanation of what happened and a detailed account of the dialogue between the client and social worker.

Good 25.2 (28.00%) - 28.3185 (31.465%)

The written transcript provides a moderately thorough explanation of what happened and a detailed account of the dialogue between the client and social worker.

Fair 22.05 (24.50%) - 25.1685 (27.965%)

The written transcript provides a fair explanation of what happened and a detailed account of the dialogue between the client and social worker.

Poor 0 (0.00%) - 22.0185 (24.465%)

The written transcript provides a poor explanation of what happened and a detailed account of the dialogue between the client and social worker.

Feedback:

Interpretation--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 36.45 (40.50%) - 40.5 (45.00%)

The interpretation demonstrates excellent insight to the situation, utilizing social work theories and concepts as support. The student thoroughly describes their reactions and issues related to the interaction. Student explains how social work skills were used in the situation.

Good 32.4 (36.00%) - 36.4095 (40.455%)

The interpretation demonstrates moderate insight to the situation, utilizing social work theories and concepts as support. The student moderately describes their reactions and issues related to the interaction. Student explains how social work skills were used in the situation.

Fair 28.35 (31.50%) - 32.3595 (35.955%)

The interpretation demonstrates fair insight to the situation, utilizing social work theories and concepts as support. The student minimally describes their reactions and issues related to the interaction. Student explains how social work skills were used in the situation.

Poor 0 (0.00%) - 28.3095 (31.455%)

Content does not include answers specific toThe interpretation demonstrates poor insight to the situation, utilizing social work theories and concepts as support. The student doesn’t adequately describe their reactions and issues related to the interaction. Student explains how social work skills were used in the situation. the questions asked and issues presented or additional overview information on the topic. Reflection and examples are missing.

Feedback:

Writing--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 16.2 (18.00%) - 18 (20.00%)

Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment.

Good 14.4 (16.00%) - 16.182 (17.98%)

Paper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources.

Fair 12.6 (14.00%) - 14.382 (15.98%)

Paper is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality).

Poor 0 (0.00%) - 12.582 (13.98%)

Paper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources.

Feedback:

Name:SOCW_6520_Week8_Assignment2_Rubric

Exit