S121 WIB601 PREPARATION FOR PROFESSIONAL PRACTISE
| WIB601 Professional PracticeAssignment 1 (35%) | |||||
| CRITERIA | Excellent (> 85 %) | Very good (75 – 84%) | Good (65 – 74 %) |
Acceptable (50 – 64%) | Unacceptable (<50%) |
|
Appropriate selection of the company and Profile summary (20% of total mark) |
Provides a clear and succinct introduction about the chosen company demonstrating clear understanding of its standing Rationale is linked to personal background, interests and potential future for the selection (16-20 marks) |
Provides a very clear introduction about the chosen company. The rationale for its selection based on personal background and interests for future (14-15 marks) |
Provides a good introduction and a general rationale for selection of the organisation (12-13 marks) |
Provides a good introduction of the chosen organisation. Rationale for chosing the organisation is vague (10-11 marks) |
Selection of the organisation is inappropriate Profile summary is fictional and made up. Unclear profile (<10 marks) |
|
Organisation Structure and Presence (20% of total mark) |
Demonstrates succinct understanding of the structure of the organisation. The organisational presence is demonstrated from global and local levels, with an Australian perspective. (16-20 marks) |
Demonstrates a clear understanding of the organisational structure, its local and international presence from an Australian perspective (14-15 marks) | Demonstrates a good understanding of organisational structure and its presence locally. (12-13 marks) |
Demonstrates a general understanding of the organisational structure in general (10-11 marks) |
Demonstrates no understanding of the structure The structure is vague and unclear in explanation. (<10 marks) |
|
SWOT Analysis (40% of total mark) |
Excellent SWOT analysis clearly demonstrating and explain each element. Thought process behind the perspectives is well evidenced via references that are relevant. (32-40 marks) |
Clear SWOT analysis with explanations Adequate evidence to support the arguments (28-31 marks) |
Provides SWOT analysis explaining some of the details and reasonable evidence to support (24-27 marks) |
Good SWOT analysis demonstrating general understanding and some evidence support. (20-23 marks) |
A vague SWOT analysis that does not demonstrate any understanding or evidence to support (<20 marks) |
|
References & Professional Writing/Presentation (20% of total mark) |
Relevant referencing evidenced in the correct format, where applicable Highly developed professional writing demonstrated. (16-20 marks) |
References are relevant and current to the context Professional language and writing demonstrated (14-15 marks) |
References are adequate to the work Language and writing demonstrates attention to detail (12-13 marks) |
Some references are provided Language and writing is reasonable (10-11 marks) |
No references or evidence Language and writing is unstructured and unprofessional (<10 marks) |