F46

NRSE 4600 M5 A9 RUBRIC: WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT: FINAL PAPER OF THE EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING PROJECT (40 pts)

Last updated: 09/10/2021 © 2021 School of Nursing - Ohio University Page 1 of 2

Criteria Levels of Achievement

Accomplished Needs Improvement Not Acceptable Abstract 3 to 3 points

• Brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper

1 to 2 points • Summary of the paper with

disorganized thought

0 to 1 Points • Vague, disorganized and

lacking paper content Introduction 4 to 4 Points

• Clearly states the purpose of the paper.

• Provides a comprehensive overview of topic or questions.

• Engages the reader. • Organized and has easy follow.

1 to 3 Points • Overview is provided, but key

points/ideas are missing. • Purpose statement is not clear. • Does not engage the reader. • Somewhat disorganized but still

comprehensible

0 to 1 Points • Does not provide an overview of

the paper or is absent. • No purpose statement.

Body

The Problem 2 to 2 Points • Provides a thorough scope,

duration of, and history of selected problem with supporting evidence

1 Point • Provides scope, duration of, and

history of selected problem with supporting evidence, but is weak in one or more areas

0 Point • Discussion was ineffective or

absent

Supportive Organization 2 to 2 Points • Provides a thorough discussion

of the organization selected and how they support the problem.

1 Point • Provides selected organization

but is weak in discussion of how problem is supported

0 Point • Discussion was ineffective or

absent

Second Solution 2 to 2 Points • Proposed solution is clearly

defined, linked to global and project objectives with supporting examples and evidence based references

1 Point • Proposed solution is clearly

defined, linked to global and project objectives without supporting examples and evidence based references

0 Point • Discussion was ineffective or

absent

Implementation and evaluation of the Second Solution

4 to 4 Points • Implementation Plan and

evaluation of the second solution is organized.

• Utilizes stakeholders, resources, and is timely.

• Supporting examples provided.

2 to 3 Points • Implementation Plan and

evaluation of the second solution is organized.

• Utilizes stakeholders, resources, and is timely.

• Without examples

0 to 1 Points • Discussion was ineffective or

absent

Overall Project Evaluation

8 to 8 Points • Overall CPP is evaluated, clear

discussion, organized thought and examples provided

3 to 7 Points • Project is evaluated, discussion

is organized, examples provided

0 to 2 Points • Discussion was ineffective or

absent

NRSE 4600 M5 A9 RUBRIC: WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT: FINAL PAPER OF THE EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING PROJECT (40 pts)

Last updated: 09/10/2021 © 2021 School of Nursing - Ohio University Page 2 of 2

Criteria Levels of Achievement

Accomplished Needs Improvement Not Acceptable Mentor (Preceptor) Experience

2 to 2 Points • Clear explanation of work

completed, includes positive, negative, helpful and areas of need

1 Point • Explanation is clear, but

missing a topic

0 Point • Discussion was ineffective or

absent

Conclusion 7 to 7 Points • Summarizes paper and reflects

on what the reader has learned from the paper.

• Demonstrates persuasive thought and is well organized.

2 to 6 Points • Merely summarizes the

introduction or contains new ideas not present in the paper contents.

• Somewhat disorganized but still comprehensible

0 to 1 Points • Simply restates the

introduction or is absent. • Disorganized to the point of

distraction.

Stylistics 6 to 6 Points • APA Citations are appropriate. • Formatted correctly. • Reference page is complete and

correctly formatted. • At least 8 references provided:

One (1) references from required course materials and seven (7) peer-reviewed references. *References not older than five years.

• At least 4-5 page paper (no more than 5 pages, not including the title page, abstract, or reference page).

3 to 5 Points • APA Citations are appropriate

and formatted correctly. • Reference page is formatted

correctly. • References are not professional

or is not formatted correctly. • Missing 1 professional

reference. • More than 5 pages, not

including the title page, abstract, or reference page).

0 to 2 Points • No citations are used or

citations are made but not formatted correctly

• Reference page is missing. • Less than 4-5 pages, (not

including the title page, abstract, or reference page).

Peer-reviewed references include professional journals (i.e. Nursing Education Perspectives, Journal of Professional Nursing, etc.), professional organizations (NLN, CDC, AACN, ADA, etc.) applicable to population and practice area, along with clinical practice guidelines (ECRI Institute - https://guidelines.ecri.org). References not acceptable (not inclusive) are UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases.

*All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information)

Note: You will have three (3) attempts to submit a written assignment, only the final attempt will be graded. For each attempt you will receive a SafeAssign originality report. This will give you a chance to correct the assignment based on the SafeAssign score. Click here to view instructions on how to interpret SafeAssign originality report.