ENG 121 WEEK 2 DISCUSSION 2

profilemissykitty12
RUBRIC3.docx
Home>Business & Finance homework help>Management homework help>ENG 121 WEEK 2 DISCUSSION 2

Discussion Rubric - 3 points

You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.

Discussion Rubric - 3 points

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome General Content/Subject Knowledge _3873

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

0.9 to >0.79 pts

Distinguished - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the discussion topic.

blank

Edit rating Delete rating

0.79 to >0.68 pts

Proficient - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates knowledge of the discussion topic.

_6191

Edit rating Delete rating

0.68 to >0.58 pts

Basic - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates basic knowledge of the discussion topic.

_3505

Edit rating Delete rating

0.58 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations - Addresses all or most aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates limited knowledge of the discussion topic.

_4833

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Non-Performance - There is no initial discussion post, or the post does not address the discussion prompt at all.

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

  / 0.9 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking _8749

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

0.9 to >0.79 pts

Distinguished - Comprehensively explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates all of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

_1288

Edit rating Delete rating

0.79 to >0.68 pts

Proficient - Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates most of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

_358

Edit rating Delete rating

0.68 to >0.58 pts

Basic - Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates some of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, and use of information, and logic.

_6819

Edit rating Delete rating

0.58 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations - Attempts to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information, but demonstrates few of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

_3037

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Non-Performance - There is no attempt to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information in either the original post or subsequent response posts within the discussion, or no post is present.

_8665

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

  / 0.9 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Engagement/ Participation _8825

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

0.9 to >0.79 pts

Distinguished - Contributes to classroom conversations with at least the minimum number of replies, all of which were thoughtful, relevant, and contributed meaningfully to the conversation. Fully engages in the conversation with appropriate topic-based responses.

_6735

Edit rating Delete rating

0.79 to >0.68 pts

Proficient - Contributes to classroom conversations with the minimum number of replies that are somewhat thoughtful, relevant, and contributed meaningfully to the conversation. Attempts to fully engage in the conversation with appropriate topic-based responses.

_8503

Edit rating Delete rating

0.68 to >0.58 pts

Basic - Contributes to the classroom conversations with the minimum number of replies. Attempts to fully engage in the conversation, but the responses are not relevant or fully aligned with the discussion topic.

_2122

Edit rating Delete rating

0.58 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations - Attempts to contribute to the classroom conversations with fewer than the minimum number of replies; however, the replies are not thoughtful and relevant, or they do not contribute meaningfully to the conversation.

_957

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Non-Performance - There is no contribution to the discussion.

_3992

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

  / 0.9 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication _7280

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

0.3 to >0.26 pts

Distinguished - Displays clear control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

_3163

Edit rating Delete rating

0.26 to >0.23 pts

Proficient - Displays control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows transitions and/or flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains only a few errors and is mostly easy to understand.

_6655

Edit rating Delete rating

0.23 to >0.19 pts

Basic - Displays basic control of syntax and mechanics. The work is not organized with appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains several errors, making it difficult to fully understand.

_4166

Edit rating Delete rating

0.19 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations - Displays limited control of syntax or mechanics. The work does not include any transitions and does not flow easily between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains major errors.

_5671

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Non-Performance - Fails to display control of syntax or mechanics, within the original post and/or responses. Organization is also not present.

_157

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

  / 0.3 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion

view longer description

Range

threshold: 5 pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 to >0 pts

Full Marks

blank

Edit rating Delete rating

0 to >0 pts

No Marks

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

  / 5 pts

--

Additional Comments

Total Points

Discussion Rubric - 3 points

Discussion Rubric - 3 points

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome General Content/Subject Knowledge

0.9 pts

Distinguished - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the discussion topic.

0.79 pts

Proficient - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates knowledge of the discussion topic.

0.68 pts

Basic - Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates basic knowledge of the discussion topic.

0.58 pts

Below Expectations - Addresses all or most aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates limited knowledge of the discussion topic.

0.0 pts

Non-Performance - There is no initial discussion post, or the post does not address the discussion prompt at all.

0.9 pts

Additional Comments

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking

0.9 pts

Distinguished - Comprehensively explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates all of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

0.79 pts

Proficient - Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates most of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

0.68 pts

Basic - Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates some of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, and use of information, and logic.

0.58 pts

Below Expectations - Attempts to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information, but demonstrates few of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

0.0 pts

Non-Performance - There is no attempt to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information in either the original post or subsequent response posts within the discussion, or no post is present.

0.9 pts

Additional Comments

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Engagement/ Participation

0.9 pts

Distinguished - Contributes to classroom conversations with at least the minimum number of replies, all of which were thoughtful, relevant, and contributed meaningfully to the conversation. Fully engages in the conversation with appropriate topic-based responses.

0.79 pts

Proficient - Contributes to classroom conversations with the minimum number of replies that are somewhat thoughtful, relevant, and contributed meaningfully to the conversation. Attempts to fully engage in the conversation with appropriate topic-based responses.

0.68 pts

Basic - Contributes to the classroom conversations with the minimum number of replies. Attempts to fully engage in the conversation, but the responses are not relevant or fully aligned with the discussion topic.

0.58 pts

Below Expectations - Attempts to contribute to the classroom conversations with fewer than the minimum number of replies; however, the replies are not thoughtful and relevant, or they do not contribute meaningfully to the conversation.

0.0 pts

Non-Performance - There is no contribution to the discussion.

0.9 pts

Additional Comments

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication

0.3 pts

Distinguished - Displays clear control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

0.26 pts

Proficient - Displays control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows transitions and/or flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains only a few errors and is mostly easy to understand.

0.23 pts

Basic - Displays basic control of syntax and mechanics. The work is not organized with appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains several errors, making it difficult to fully understand.

0.19 pts

Below Expectations - Displays limited control of syntax or mechanics. The work does not include any transitions and does not flow easily between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains major errors.

0.0 pts

Non-Performance - Fails to display control of syntax or mechanics, within the original post and/or responses. Organization is also not present.

0.3 pts

Additional Comments

Additional Comments

Total Points

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.3

5