Paper

4/11/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_635442_1&course_id=_108021_1… 1/6

Rubric DetailRubric Detail  A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Successful Adequate Developing NeedImprovement

Company Overview

0.5 (5.00%) Provided a thorough brief background of the company, its services, key stakeholders, and weblink; all supported by academic or reputable industry references.

0.375 (3.75%) Provided a brief background of the company, its services, key stakeholders, and weblink, but missed at least one of the requirements; all supported by academic or reputable industry references.

0.25 (2.50%) Provided a thorough brief background of the company, its services, key stakeholders, and weblink, and not supported by academic or reputable industry references; primarily opinion statements.

0.125 (1.25% Provided a brie background of t company, its services, key stakeholders, a weblink, but missed at least one of the requirements; n supported by academic or reputable indus references; primarily opinio statements.

Topic Development: Critical business operation, process or

1 (10.00%) Identified a feasible business operation,

0.75 (7.50%) Identified a feasible business operation,

0.5 (5.00%) Identified a feasible business operation,

0.25 (2.50% Incorrectly identified a feasible busine

Name: BIA Paper Rubric

Description: Scenario papers are graded using the following rubrics. ExitExit

Grid View List View

4/11/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_635442_1&course_id=_108021_1… 2/6

  Successful Adequate Developing NeedImprovement

process, or function

p , process, or function; needed technology, personnel, and other required resources; and probable maximum allowable outage time; all fully supported by academic or reputable industry references.

p , process, or function; needed technology, personnel, and other required resources; and probable maximum allowable outage time; but missed at least one of the needed components; supported by academic or reputable industry references.

p , process, or function; needed technology, personnel, and other required resources; and probable maximum allowable outage time; not supported by academic or reputable industry references; primarily opinion statements.

operation, process, or function; neede technology, personnel, and other required resources; or probable maximum allowable outag time; not supported by academic or reputable indus references; primarily opinio statements.

Topic Development: Identified inputs and outputs

2 (20.00%) Identified two feasible inputs and outputs for the selected operation. Fully elaborated on each identified elements and any of its other dependencies; all fully supported by academic or reputable industry references.

1.5 (15.00%) Identified two feasible inputs and outputs for the selected operation. Fully elaborated on each identified elements and any of its other dependencies; but missed at least one of the needed components; all fully supported by academic or reputable industry references.

1 (10.00%) Identified two feasible inputs and outputs for the selected operation. Elaborated on each identified elements and any of its other dependencies; not supported by academic or reputable industry references; primarily opinion statements.

0.5 (5.00%) Incorrectly identified feasib inputs and outp for the selected operation; somewhat elaborated on each identified element and an of its other dependencies; somewhat supported by academic or reputable indus references.

Topic Development: Applicable Federal, state, or regulatory laws

1 (10.00%) Identified and explained the Federal, state, or

0.75 (7.50%) Identified and explained the Federal, state, or

0.5 (5.00%) Incorrectly identified or somewhat

0.25 (2.50% Incorrectly identified or somewhat

4/11/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_635442_1&course_id=_108021_1… 3/6

  Successful Adequate Developing NeedImprovement

regulatory laws , , other regulatory laws related to the operation’s inoperability, if such laws exist for the operation. If not, provided a detailed explanation as to why; all supported by academic or reputable industry references.

, , other regulatory laws related to the operation’s inoperability, if such laws exist for the operation. If not, provided a detailed explanation as to why; not supported by academic or reputable industry references; primarily opinion statements.

explained the Federal, state, or other regulatory laws related to the operation’s inoperability, if such laws exist for the operation. If not, a provided a somewhat detailed explanation as to why; all supported by academic or reputable industry references.

explained the Federal, state,  other regulatory laws related to  operation’s inoperability, if such laws exist the operation. I not, a provided  somewhat deta explanation as  why; not supported by academic or reputable indus references; primarily opinio statements.

Topic Development: Solution feasibility and recommendations

3 (30.00%) Proposed a feasible and executable business alternative, thoroughly explained the benefits and disadvantages for the recommendations; all fully supported by academic or reputable industry references.

2.25 (22.50%) Proposed a feasible and executable business alternative, somewhat explained the benefits and disadvantages for the recommendations; minimally supported by academic or reputable industry references.

1.5 (15.00%) Proposed a feasible and executable business alternative, somewhat explained the benefits and disadvantages for the recommendations; not supported by academic or reputable industry references.

0.75 (7.50% Recommendati were not feasib or executable business alternatives, ful or somewhat supported by academic or reputable indus references.

Writing Mechanics

0.75 (7.50%) Strictly adhered to the standard usage rules of

0.5625 (5.625%) Excellently adhered to the

0.375 (3.75%) Satisfactorily adhered to the standard usage

0.1875 (1.875%) Minimally adhe to the standard

4/11/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_635442_1&course_id=_108021_1… 4/6

  Successful Adequate Developing NeedImprovement

g written mechanics; uses paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run­ on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used. Zero to two errors noted.

adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics; uses paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run­ on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used. Three to six errors noted.

g rules of written mechanics ; uses paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run­ on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. Some contractions or jargon used. Seven to 10 errors noted.

to the standard usage rules of written mechan and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bull points. Written mechanics inclu but are not limit to, capitalizatio punctuation, ru on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. Contractions or jargon used. M than 10 errors found OR somewhat incomprehensib

APA Style (6th ed.)

0.75 (7.50%) Appropriately cited reference materials; authors last name, initials, publication year, source title, publication name, issue, volume, and weblink. Reference listed in alphabetical. In­ text citations include the authors last name, publication year, and page number if using a direct language from the source. 1 ­ 2 APA style or usage errors.

0.5625 (5.625%) Attempted in­text citations and reference list but 3 ­ 4 APA style errors existed OR failed to use APA citations when appropriate 1 ­ 2 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference.

0.375 (3.75%) Attempted in­text citations and reference list but 5 ­ 6 APA style errors existed OR failed to use APA citations when appropriate 3 – 4 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference.

0.1875 (1.875%) Attempted in­te citations and reference list bu ­ 8 APA style errors existed O failed to use AP citations when appropriate 5 ­  times througho meaning the ide expressed were not the student original thought but information used from an uncited referen

Attention to Instructions

1 (10.00%) Scenario paper contained all 5 major assignment

0.75 (7.50%) Scenario paper omitted one major assignment

0.5 (5.00%) Scenario paper omitted two major assignment

0.25 (2.50% Scenario paper omitted three major assignme

4/11/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_635442_1&course_id=_108021_1… 5/6

  Successful Adequate Developing NeedImprovement

j g requirements: 1) Title page; 2) At least 2­pages in length (not including title and reference pages; 3) At least 6 scholarly references no older than 2005; 4) Addresses all the scenario topics in the order written; and 5) final product is written in a clear and concise manner, while adhering to all other assignment requirements and instruction guidelines.

g requirements.

g requirements.

j g requirements.

Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) Plagiarized: There is a zero­tolerance policy for academic dishonesty and plagiarism. Per the course syllabus, any student who engages in academic dishonesty and plagiarism will receive a zero for all corresponding sections for the assignment. As an example, if you plagiarize Scenario Submission 1, you will receive a zero for both Scenario Submission 1 and Scenario Response 1 assignments.

0 (0.00%) Late: Per the course syllabus, no late assignments are accepted without prior approval.

0 (0.00%) Off­topic: Submission was completely off­ topic.

0 (0.00%)

Name:BIA Paper Rubric

Description:Scenario papers are graded using the following rubrics. ExitExit

4/11/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_635442_1&course_id=_108021_1… 6/6