Foundations and Essentials for the Doctor of Nursing Practice

profileTinacherry100$
Rubric3.docx
Home>Nursing homework help>Foundations and Essentials for the Doctor of Nursing Practice

Rubric

NURS_8002_Module4_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8002_Module4_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite a 1-paragraph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and clearly introduces in detail how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including a detailed description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the introduction and process described.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an accurate description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the introduction and process described.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response inaccurately or vaguely introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an inaccurate or vague description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. ... The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the introduction and process described.

13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response inaccurately and vaguely introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an inaccurate and vague description of the literature search process and the databases consulted, or it is missing. ... The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the introduction and process describes, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail each of the articles selected.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately summarizes each of the articles selected.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected. ... OR ... The response summarizes < 3 articles.

13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite 1 paragraph that synthesizes the 3 articles using a scholarly voice.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response comprehensively and fully synthesizes the content from the 3 articles selected that accurately and clearly support in detail the practice area or area of interest selected.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response synthesizes the content from the 3 articles selected that accurately supports the practice area or area of interest selected.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response inaccurately or vaguely synthesizes content from the articles selected that may lend support to the practice area or area of interest selected.

17 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response inaccurately and vaguely synthesizes content from the 3 articles selected that does not lend support to the practice area or area of interest selected, or it is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the differences explained.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the differences explained.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. ... The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the differences explained.

13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research, or it is missing. ... The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the differences explained, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. ... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous Next

Rubric

NURS_8002_Module4_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8002_Module4_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite a 1-paragraph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and clearly introduces in detail how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including a detailed description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the introduction and process described.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an accurate description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the introduction and process described.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response inaccurately or vaguely introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an inaccurate or vague description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. ... The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the introduction and process described.

13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response inaccurately and vaguely introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an inaccurate and vague description of the literature search process and the databases consulted, or it is missing. ... The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the introduction and process describes, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail each of the articles selected.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately summarizes each of the articles selected.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected. ... OR ... The response summarizes < 3 articles.

13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite 1 paragraph that synthesizes the 3 articles using a scholarly voice.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response comprehensively and fully synthesizes the content from the 3 articles selected that accurately and clearly support in detail the practice area or area of interest selected.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response synthesizes the content from the 3 articles selected that accurately supports the practice area or area of interest selected.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response inaccurately or vaguely synthesizes content from the articles selected that may lend support to the practice area or area of interest selected.

17 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response inaccurately and vaguely synthesizes content from the 3 articles selected that does not lend support to the practice area or area of interest selected, or it is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the differences explained.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the differences explained.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. ... The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the differences explained.

13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research, or it is missing. ... The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the differences explained, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. ... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100