HR2

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00%

3 Satisfactory 75.00%

4 Good 85.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

100.0 %Criteria

20.0 %Key Factors that Led to Breakdown of Relations

No key factors are described.

Not all key factors are described and/or some key factors are inadequately described.

All key factors are given a cursory description.

All key factors are described thoroughly.

All key factors are described thoroughly, using novel examples.

15.0 %Management Contribution to the Situation

Management contribution to the situation is not described.

Management contribution to the situation is inaccurately described.

Management contribution to the situation is described at a cursory level.

Management contribution to the situation is described thoroughly.

Management contribution to the situation is described thoroughly, with detail and examples.

15.0 %Cross-cultural Issues' Contribution to the Situation

Cross-cultural issues' contribution to the situation is not described.

Cross-cultural issues' contribution to the situation is inaccurately described.

Cross-cultural issues' contribution to the situation is described at a cursory level.

Cross-cultural issues' contribution to the situation is described thoroughly.

Cross-cultural issues' contribution to the situation is described thoroughly, with detail and examples.

20.0 %Recommended HR Improvement Strategy

A recommended HR improvement strategy is not provided.

The recommended HR improvement strategy is not appropriate.

The recommended HR improvement strategy is described at a cursory level.

The recommended HR improvement strategy is thoroughly described.

The recommended HR improvement strategy is thoroughly described, with detail and examples.

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. 

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

13.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. 

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. 

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. 

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct. 

100 %Total Weightage